Reply #68: that's not snarkiness, that's reality

[OnTheOtherHand]

By the way, this is a thread on the exit poll controversy. At least, that's what it says in the OP. But you apparently don't know or care about the exit polls. So I am pissed, of course. And no, you will not waste my time by changing the subject.

Even though, predictably, you didn't answer any of my questions, I will answer one of yours. We don't know that there wasn't fraud in the 1992 election. However, no one who claims to believe that exit polls are accurate has done any work to show that there actually was, or might have been, not only fraud in the 1992 election, but fraud that would explain the exit poll discrepancy.

Even weirder, there hasn't been much attempt to prove that fraud in the 2004 election could explain the exit poll discrepancy. Which brings us back to New York.

You said something smart in #65: if you identify the counties that switched to DREs between 2000 and 2004, you can compare the election returns to see if they are anomalous. I will help, if you want.