You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #39: 10 Main Pros and Cons on Electronic Voting Machines. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
JimDandy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
39. 10 Main Pros and Cons on Electronic Voting Machines.
The Pro/Con Foundation has set up a brand new website that explores whether DRE machines improve the voting process:

www.votingmachinesprocon.org

(On "this website, the term 'electronic voting machines' refers to direct recording electronic (DRE) voting machines and not optical-scan machines. Although optical-scan machines use an electronic reader to tabulate the vote totals, voters mark their selections on a paper ballot and are not directly recording their votes into the machine.")


The 10 issues below are components of our core question "Does the use of electronic voting machines improve the voting process?"

-------------------------------------

1. Does federal legislation mandate the use of electronic voting machines?

PRO: "The Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA) highlights the importance of making voting systems accessible to all communities, especially those historically disenfranchised...

Direct Recording Electronic voting machines (DREs)...can be made fully accessible for persons with disabilities. Because punchcard and optical scan machines are paper systems, they are not fully accessible for the blind or visually impaired. Similarly, the mechanical nature of lever machines impedes accessibility for voters with limited mobility and strength."
-- People for the American Way
4/20/2006

CON: "HAVA does not require DREs. Optical-scan based systems are HAVA compliant...Typically, a voter using an optical scan system receives a paper ballot along with a marking pen or pencil...Voters who are visually impaired or require ballots in a foreign language can use tactile ballots or a computerized optical scan ballot-marking machine with attached headphones. Such a machine would allow all voters, including blind voters, to confirm or verify their ballot choices by sliding the ballot into a computerized reader with attached headphones."
-- National Committee for Voting Integrity
5/5/2004



The Pros/Cons of these last nine questions are answered on their website:

2. Are electronic voting machines more susceptible to fraud than non-electronic voting machines?

3. Do electronic voting machines accurately capture the intent of the voter?

4. Are votes cast on electronic voting machines stored securely?

5. Are electronic voting machines vulnerable to hacking?

6. Could electronic voting machine software be programmed to alter the outcome of an election?

7. Are there sufficient procedures in place to guard against physical tampering with electronic voting machines?

8. Is it possible for one person to vote multiple times in the same election on an electronic voting machine?

9. Should source code for electronic voting machines be publicly available?

10. Should electronic voting machines have voter verified paper audit trails?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Election Reform, Fraud, & Related News, SUNDAY June 11, 2006 rumpel  Jun-11-06 11:49 AM   #0 
  - IN: Registration gap could have let Rokita vote twice  rumpel   Jun-11-06 11:55 AM   #1 
  - AZ: Electronic ballots are unreliable, not secure  rumpel   Jun-11-06 12:01 PM   #2 
  - FL: Hearing slated to limit voting device checks  rumpel   Jun-11-06 12:09 PM   #3 
  - Link to the thread that I started with the wrong title and date.  MelissaB   Jun-11-06 12:15 PM   #4 
  - ...  rumpel   Jun-11-06 12:26 PM   #6 
  - MA: Lawmakers mull allowing younger poll workers  rumpel   Jun-11-06 12:25 PM   #5 
  - KS: Polling Consolidation  rumpel   Jun-11-06 12:28 PM   #7 
  - Election Reform, Fraud, & Related News Saturday, June 10, 2006  MelissaB   Jun-11-06 12:46 PM   #8 
  - FL (Sancho): State May Limit Tests Of Voting Machines  MelissaB   Jun-11-06 12:46 PM   #9 
  - Test and verify  MelissaB   Jun-11-06 12:46 PM   #12 
  - Sancho says he will fight rule changes  MelissaB   Jun-11-06 12:46 PM   #13 
     - Discussion in LBN  MelissaB   Jun-11-06 12:46 PM   #30 
  - Utah: Voting: A Touchy Subject  MelissaB   Jun-11-06 12:46 PM   #10 
  - AZ: Electronic ballots are unreliable, not secure  MelissaB   Jun-11-06 12:46 PM   #11 
  - Electronic voting requires paper records  MelissaB   Jun-11-06 12:46 PM   #14 
  - Letter From America (Korea)  MelissaB   Jun-11-06 12:46 PM   #15 
  - Discussion  Wilms   Jun-11-06 01:17 PM   #37 
  - IN: An experiment to improve voting  MelissaB   Jun-11-06 12:46 PM   #16 
  - Yahoo: Michelle Pilecki: Ann Coulter's Pattern of Deceit Also Bothers Cons  MelissaB   Jun-11-06 12:46 PM   #17 
  - Florida: Don't leave elections to politicians  MelissaB   Jun-11-06 12:46 PM   #18 
  - discussion  MelissaB   Jun-11-06 12:46 PM   #19 
  - LTTE: New Winnebago voting machines bad news  MelissaB   Jun-11-06 12:46 PM   #20 
  - Blackwell watch  MelissaB   Jun-11-06 12:46 PM   #21 
  - Blackwell's dual roles draw fire  MelissaB   Jun-11-06 12:46 PM   # 
  - Strickland campaign fund tops Blackwell's  MelissaB   Jun-11-06 12:46 PM   #23 
  - Democrats use King in attack on Blackwell  MelissaB   Jun-11-06 12:46 PM   #24 
  - Official Expects Voter ID Requirement To Complicate Fall Election  MelissaB   Jun-11-06 12:46 PM   #25 
  - A steady line of attack  MelissaB   Jun-11-06 12:46 PM   #26 
  - Diebold lobbyist donates $10,000 to Blackwell  MelissaB   Jun-11-06 12:46 PM   #27 
  - Yahoo: Fighting for a Fair Vote  MelissaB   Jun-11-06 12:46 PM   #28 
  - Bob Cesca: Republicans Agree: Our Elections Aren't Stolen!  MelissaB   Jun-11-06 12:46 PM   #29 
  - Aargh! This should say SUNDAY!  MelissaB   Jun-11-06 12:46 PM   #31 
     - errare humanum es (to err is human)  rumpel   Jun-11-06 12:51 PM   #32 
     - Don't feel bad...  livvy   Jun-11-06 08:29 PM   #41 
  - OH: Strickland taps ex-backers of Taft for campaign cash  rumpel   Jun-11-06 12:46 PM   #22 
  - OH: Gubernatorial election likely to delay chancellor search  rumpel   Jun-11-06 12:55 PM   #33 
  - WI: Renew protections of Voting Rights Act (Letters)  rumpel   Jun-11-06 01:02 PM   #34 
  - CO: RECORDS FOR 150,000 COLO. VOTERS MISSING  rumpel   Jun-11-06 01:05 PM   #35 
  - Discussion  Wilms   Jun-11-06 01:16 PM   #36 
  - WAPO: Democrats Closing Fundraising Gap With Republicans  rumpel   Jun-11-06 01:21 PM   #38 
  - 10 Main Pros and Cons on Electronic Voting Machines.  JimDandy   Jun-11-06 03:37 PM   #39 
  - in your face!  paineinthearse   Jun-11-06 07:38 PM   #40 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC