BeFree
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-05-06 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
| 9. Lost in the woods, eh? |
|
Well, yeah. When it comes to bill making (they say its like making sausage) then, yeah, lost.
Things change. Bills change. 550 can change. Make it so, if you can. I hope you do.
|
| -The HOLT BILL, major major problems in Election Reform-Land |
Land Shark |
Apr-05-06 09:45 PM |
#0 |
-
Vote # 1. This belongs on the DU Homepage, imho. |
understandinglife |
Apr-05-06 09:48 PM |
#1 |
-
Voter #2 |
windy252 |
Apr-05-06 09:48 PM |
#2 |
-
#3. First-rate analysis and explanation of the key voting security issues |
bleever |
Apr-05-06 09:56 PM |
#3 |
-
KNR- #4 |
kster |
Apr-05-06 09:59 PM |
#4 |
-
Ivory Soap is 99 and 44 one-hundredths per cent pure. So... |
bleever |
Apr-05-06 10:06 PM |
#5 |
-
I say I'm voter #5. |
Wilms |
Apr-05-06 10:08 PM |
#6 |
-
Can't, won't argue |
BeFree |
Apr-05-06 10:14 PM |
#7 |
 -
If you're lost in the woods, it's wise to sit and think for a while |
Land Shark |
Apr-05-06 10:17 PM |
#8 |
-
Lost in the woods, eh? |
BeFree |
Apr-05-06 10:20 PM |
#9 |
-
I'm only rebutting tangentially the idea that we MUST do something |
Land Shark |
Apr-05-06 10:26 PM |
#11 |
-
Suggest amendments if you like-but April 6/7 is call the Hill to pass Holt |
papau |
Apr-07-06 08:55 AM |
#54 |
-
Hey LS: If all politics is local, why isn't the vote-counting? |
bleever |
Apr-05-06 10:25 PM |
#10 |
 -
Well said. n/t |
Wilms |
Apr-05-06 10:31 PM |
#12 |
  -
We vote locally. I trust those good folks who man my precinct |
bleever |
Apr-05-06 10:39 PM |
#13 |
 -
This is the argument I find myself making. |
Wilms |
Apr-05-06 11:30 PM |
#16 |
 -
I agree ...seriously ...why not? |
NVMojo |
Apr-05-06 11:38 PM |
#20 |
-
Here are yet more reasons for caution: |
Amaryllis |
Apr-05-06 11:00 PM |
#14 |
 -
What's with Sec. 5, Amarylls? |
Peace Patriot |
Apr-06-06 12:16 AM |
#27 |
-
Someone else wrote this so I can't answer your question! But I think |
Amaryllis |
Apr-06-06 12:03 PM |
#38 |
-
don't forget the Trojan Horse problem. Nothing good will come out of this |
Amaryllis |
Apr-05-06 11:07 PM |
#15 |
 -
HAVA and HOLT here we go again |
kster |
Apr-05-06 11:34 PM |
#17 |
  -
Is that a Sequoia Redwood touchscreen, kster? n/t |
Wilms |
Apr-05-06 11:37 PM |
#19 |
 -
Once again, I'm with Amaryllis |
GuvWurld |
Apr-06-06 01:02 AM |
#31 |
-
definitely home page, must read material! |
NVMojo |
Apr-05-06 11:34 PM |
#18 |
-
HR 550 appears to have several critically important, positive provisions... |
Peace Patriot |
Apr-05-06 11:40 PM |
#21 |
 -
LS isn;t saying there aren't some positive provisions, just that there are |
Amaryllis |
Apr-05-06 11:49 PM |
#23 |
 -
response to some of Peace Patriot's specific points |
Land Shark |
Apr-06-06 01:36 AM |
#32 |
-
Land Shark, is Holt lying to us? If so, we need to know if this is |
Peace Patriot |
Apr-06-06 02:37 PM |
#42 |
-
A spearhead/michael franti song line: U want rights? Ask 'em to READ 'em |
Land Shark |
Apr-06-06 02:46 PM |
#44 |
-
READ THIS |
garybeck |
Apr-05-06 11:46 PM |
#22 |
 -
That's what I posted on post 14. That's okay; people will be more likelly |
Amaryllis |
Apr-05-06 11:50 PM |
#24 |
-
yup, i saw yours after I posted. we'll survive :) n/t |
garybeck |
Apr-06-06 12:09 AM |
#26 |
-
Well speaking for a state whose Election Law allows us to keep |
Bill Bored |
Apr-06-06 12:03 AM |
#25 |
 -
Audits very critical, can't afford Holt audits discrediting all audits |
Land Shark |
Apr-06-06 12:58 AM |
#29 |
-
I am amending my "Resources for American Revolution II" as follows: |
Peace Patriot |
Apr-06-06 12:36 AM |
#28 |
-
And here's more: |
Bill Bored |
Apr-06-06 01:00 AM |
#30 |
-
Let's apply the Holt "audit" provision to some place like Iowa |
Land Shark |
Apr-06-06 01:42 AM |
#33 |
 -
This is why |
BeFree |
Apr-06-06 09:54 PM |
#48 |
-
Thank you. I'm tired of second class solutions to world class problems. |
autorank |
Apr-06-06 02:22 AM |
#34 |
 -
thanks for your thoughts auto, always on point |
Land Shark |
Apr-06-06 09:59 AM |
#35 |
 -
DBSM? |
Amaryllis |
Apr-06-06 11:59 AM |
#36 |
-
LS, what about your argument that SECRET VOTE COUNTING is illegal |
Amaryllis |
Apr-06-06 12:01 PM |
#37 |
 -
that's a good point, but we need to weigh in on what constitutes PROOF |
Land Shark |
Apr-06-06 01:37 PM |
#40 |
 -
Can you guess which one is Diebold and which one is Holt 550? |
kster |
Apr-06-06 10:28 PM |
#49 |
-
Great image, Kster! Lemme see....after careful deliberation I think I have |
Amaryllis |
Apr-07-06 10:33 AM |
#55 |
 -
Yep, the Coyote " Holt bill" is trying to get the Road runner "Diebold" |
kster |
Apr-07-06 06:43 PM |
#56 |
-
I thought Diebold was coyote and Holt was roadrunner! Roadrunner is |
Amaryllis |
Apr-07-06 08:10 PM |
#57 |
-
Acme is Diebold, Road Runner is the Election and the Coyote is... |
Bill Bored |
Apr-07-06 08:59 PM |
#58 |
-
Meep Meep!! That's a good one. |
Land Shark |
Apr-07-06 10:39 PM |
#60 |
-
I like that one, wouldn't that make our Goverment be like |
kster |
Apr-07-06 11:03 PM |
#61 |
-
funny thing is, once you realize the odds of this 2% audit catching |
Land Shark |
Apr-08-06 01:39 AM |
#62 |
-
Right now there are states that |
kster |
Apr-08-06 02:23 AM |
#63 |
-
No this is an exaggeration. I'm sure it says "at least 2%." |
Bill Bored |
Apr-08-06 02:55 AM |
#64 |
-
Atleast 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 and or 10% |
kster |
Apr-08-06 03:30 AM |
#65 |
 -
doesn't matter what the bill ULTIMATELY means, you can bet your life |
Land Shark |
Apr-08-06 05:47 AM |
#66 |
-
it's true that it does say 'at least 2%' but since when do people go above |
Land Shark |
Apr-08-06 05:51 AM |
#67 |
 -
One interpretation is that if the one-in-each-county requirement |
Bill Bored |
Apr-09-06 02:43 AM |
#75 |
-
not 100% |
Febble |
Apr-09-06 05:18 AM |
#76 |
-
Because of the nature of DREs allowing for multiple ballots to be |
Land Shark |
Apr-09-06 05:51 AM |
#77 |
-
as far as the effect of "cautioning" folks to keep their fraud limited |
Land Shark |
Apr-10-06 11:42 PM |
#80 |
-
One of our county election clerks said "Be very careful what you ask for." |
Amaryllis |
Apr-06-06 01:31 PM |
#39 |
 -
Another good point, I call that "turning the kaleidoscope" above |
Land Shark |
Apr-06-06 01:39 PM |
#41 |
-
think you have a typo in second sentence in above post, can you |
Amaryllis |
Apr-06-06 02:39 PM |
#43 |
-
I certainly agree with your point about the audits |
Time for change |
Apr-06-06 03:53 PM |
#45 |
-
Paul this is great - |
Joe for Clark |
Apr-06-06 04:49 PM |
#46 |
-
kick + rec'd, nt |
mod mom |
Apr-06-06 05:20 PM |
#47 |
-
Can we take OHIO as an example? |
Bill Bored |
Apr-06-06 10:46 PM |
#50 |
-
I think we have to write our respective congressmen/women to talk |
rumpel |
Apr-07-06 01:29 AM |
#51 |
-
Imagine another Bush-styled election in November - which is likely |
Imagevision |
Apr-07-06 01:40 AM |
#52 |
 -
- |
kster |
Apr-10-06 11:29 PM |
#79 |
-
er, could you repeat that, again? : ) eom |
Land Shark |
Apr-11-06 08:32 AM |
#81 |
-
I was minutes away from |
WeHoldTheseTruths |
Apr-07-06 05:11 AM |
#53 |
 -
I'm at the votetrustusa conference right now, and it's being discussed |
Land Shark |
Apr-07-06 10:34 PM |
#59 |
-
A Bev Harris Bot appears |
WillYourVoteBCounted |
Apr-08-06 06:34 PM |
#68 |
 -
Damn I'm getting confused. |
lonestarnot |
Apr-14-06 04:27 PM |
#84 |
-
You're right, who needs voter verified paper ballots |
WillYourVoteBCounted |
Apr-08-06 06:42 PM |
#69 |
-
kick.nt |
kster |
Apr-08-06 07:25 PM |
#70 |
 -
How do you audit paperless voting? |
WillYourVoteBCounted |
Apr-08-06 07:33 PM |
#71 |
-
Better question, Why did my Government allow paperless voting |
kster |
Apr-08-06 11:51 PM |
#74 |
-
Thanks Paul! |
Steve A Play |
Apr-08-06 07:44 PM |
#72 |
 -
yeah, we just heard from Mr. Martinez of the EAC today at the DC conf'ence |
Land Shark |
Apr-08-06 08:35 PM |
#73 |
-
KICK.NT |
kster |
Apr-09-06 03:41 PM |
#78 |
-
The GOP, Diebold & Pres Jeb Bush are greatful to you |
WillYourVoteBCounted |
Apr-11-06 06:47 PM |
#82 |
-
your opposition completely deluded |
WillYourVoteBCounted |
Apr-11-06 07:05 PM |
#83 |