You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #23: I really LOVE those L&A tests, parallel testing, etc. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
Land Shark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. I really LOVE those L&A tests, parallel testing, etc.

Land Shark's evil twin spends at least an hour a day L"M"FAO because the election officials run all these test decks but the way the evil twin "helps" the elections are all totally unaffected by test decks and pass all such inane, gradeschool "tests".

EXAMPLE: on the touch screen, press a sequence of locations over and above certain letters (so it's easy to find those locations) on the main voter-boot screen, and that will have the effect of flipping the number of votes that is equal to 20 times the number of touch screen presses that occur within ten seconds after the fourth press overall is completed. e.g., Presses 1-3 specify to activate the subroutine buried in the source code, and the fourth specifies which race to affect, with 0-9 specifying the first ten races from the top of the ticket on down, and then typing in 30 in the fifth and sixth positions would flip 600 votes. Probably not a good idea to flip 600 since individual machines don't do that many in a day.

Thinking L&A tests are somehow a protection is as illogical as counting all 52 blackjack "21" cards and verifying that there are 4 aces, 4 deuces, etc., and then concluding that there's no way the game could be rigged by Marked cards. (e.g. marks on the backside of the card that indicate identity of the card)

If you think about it, tests decks are something that would be marginally useful to detect scanner error in op-scans. And that's about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC