Reply #81: You're still misleading w/ invalid analysis!

[sunshinekathy]

You said:
"I DON'T want to prove that Bush won a fair election. I WANT to prove that he didn't. But I think it is very hard, given that..."

What is making it extremely difficult is that you continue to use illogical invalid arguments that you state so sweetly and convincingly, to rule out vote fraud as the cause of the exit poll discrepancies, misleading the public who don't know much about logic and math.

American democracy deserves better.

In the future, please check the LOGIC of your own hypothesis to dismiss vote fraud - BEFORE you begin parading it around publicly. I asked you last week to check your logic and told you that it was invalid, and yet you continue here to parade this misleading incorrect logic! Lives all over the planet depend on American democracy.

Anyone, especially you, could come up with dozens of counter-examples to show how logically invalid the hypothesis is that you based your analysis on as you just stated again above.

Please check this out:
http://electionarchive.org/ucvAnalysis/US/exit-polls/ESI/ESI-hypothesis-illogical.pdf

and study the counterexample and create a spreadsheet for yourself that generates counterexamples that prove how invalid your logic (stated above) is.

Please stop obfuscating and misleading the public on this issue!

Elections analysis deserve more care.