Time for change
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-24-05 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
| 33. It sounds like you did understand my last sentence, |
|
since your first sentence addressed it.
|
| -Calculatus Eliminatus |
Febble |
Oct-23-05 04:10 PM |
#0 |
 -
hey now-- |
FogerRox |
Oct-23-05 10:13 PM |
#1 |
| -
A few corrections on the above Febble-isms |
Land Shark |
Oct-23-05 10:46 PM |
#2 |
 -
And if they are so right why won't Mitofsky |
kster |
Oct-23-05 11:17 PM |
#3 |
 -
Well, he was prepared to debate |
Febble |
Oct-24-05 02:10 AM |
#5 |
| -
I know that it |
kster |
Oct-24-05 01:39 PM |
#12 |
| -
Well I hate to say this |
Febble |
Oct-24-05 03:48 PM |
#23 |
| -
I sure would hate |
kster |
Oct-24-05 07:41 PM |
#38 |
| -
A debate generally addresses the other person's points... |
Melissa G |
Oct-24-05 08:08 PM |
#39 |
| -
Well, I'm not sure |
Febble |
Oct-25-05 06:09 AM |
#42 |
| -
I have heard the respect is returned Febble.. |
Melissa G |
Oct-25-05 10:02 PM |
#59 |
| -
I agree with your general view |
Febble |
Oct-24-05 02:07 AM |
#4 |
| -
Whatever |
BeFree |
Oct-24-05 12:47 PM |
#8 |
| -
heh |
OnTheOtherHand |
Oct-24-05 12:56 PM |
#9 |
| -
replace "what we know" with "what I believe", and it's true |
foo_bar |
Oct-24-05 01:07 PM |
#10 |
| -
inaccurate |
OnTheOtherHand |
Oct-24-05 06:38 AM |
#6 |
| -
There are ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS arguments on the other side |
Land Shark |
Oct-24-05 02:10 PM |
#13 |
| -
well, your best arguments are not based at all on exit polls, but |
OnTheOtherHand |
Oct-24-05 02:38 PM |
#15 |
| -
Can you tell me what your argument is in 1-2 sentences? |
Land Shark |
Oct-24-05 03:02 PM |
#16 |
| -
and, is there ANYTHING that the exit polls DO PROVE? (or rule out)? |
Land Shark |
Oct-24-05 03:05 PM |
#17 |
| -
See #19 |
Febble |
Oct-24-05 03:38 PM |
#21 |
| -
OK |
Febble |
Oct-24-05 03:36 PM |
#20 |
| -
Excellent short second sentence, on a par with "Jesus wept" |
Land Shark |
Oct-24-05 03:45 PM |
#22 |
| -
Well, it's a potential killer argument |
Febble |
Oct-24-05 03:49 PM |
#24 |
| -
I was admiring its brevity, mostly |
Land Shark |
Oct-24-05 04:27 PM |
#30 |
| -
Well I know you were |
Febble |
Oct-24-05 04:52 PM |
#31 |
| -
OTOH, re your post #15, I will start a new thread on what exit polls show |
Land Shark |
Oct-24-05 10:26 PM |
#40 |
| -
do you mean the "primer for screwing Democrats"? |
OnTheOtherHand |
Oct-25-05 06:50 AM |
#43 |
| -
Yes, starting that thread led me to the Primer.... |
Land Shark |
Oct-25-05 07:07 AM |
#44 |
| -
if not like criminals, than at least like policy analysts or ecologists |
OnTheOtherHand |
Oct-25-05 09:30 AM |
#45 |
| -
Yes, complex systems with multiple causation most likely, but consider |
Land Shark |
Oct-25-05 10:57 AM |
#47 |
| -
Ha! |
Febble |
Oct-25-05 10:02 AM |
#46 |
| -
Well, to take you last point, |
Febble |
Oct-24-05 03:07 PM |
#18 |
| -
Well that was entertainingly and well written, thank you. |
Land Shark |
Oct-24-05 04:22 PM |
#29 |
| -
Well I think the key exchange here |
Febble |
Oct-24-05 05:25 PM |
#34 |
| -
I'm forced to agree "net benefit" is key : ) |
Land Shark |
Oct-24-05 06:35 PM |
#37 |
| -
Well, bad news on the R squared |
Febble |
Oct-25-05 01:54 AM |
#41 |
| -
agreed on bringing these other folks in: Need to Know the Voting Systems |
Land Shark |
Oct-25-05 11:05 AM |
#48 |
| -
Are you saying? |
BeFree |
Oct-25-05 11:47 AM |
#49 |
| -
It's like a field of solid corn; one disease wipes the whole field out |
Land Shark |
Oct-25-05 12:18 PM |
#50 |
| -
A mutating disease? |
BeFree |
Oct-25-05 01:07 PM |
#51 |
| -
Well, first of all |
Febble |
Oct-25-05 01:31 PM |
#52 |
| -
If a campaign, governmental office, Mitofsky employee or anyone else |
Land Shark |
Oct-25-05 02:16 PM |
#53 |
| -
Thinking like a criminal |
BeFree |
Oct-25-05 02:56 PM |
#54 |
| -
Well, I've certainly been saying |
Febble |
Oct-25-05 03:06 PM |
#55 |
| -
Febble connecting your message #55 with the one a little further above |
Land Shark |
Oct-25-05 06:16 PM |
#58 |
| -
Well I agree |
Febble |
Oct-26-05 02:35 AM |
#61 |
| -
well, at first glance... |
OnTheOtherHand |
Oct-25-05 05:32 PM |
#56 |
| -
twin peaks! |
Land Shark |
Oct-25-05 06:09 PM |
#57 |
| -
Thank you for all your work on this, and for this thorough explanation |
Time for change |
Oct-24-05 12:01 PM |
#7 |
| -
Sometimes it's hard to get my head round this |
Febble |
Oct-24-05 01:28 PM |
#11 |
| -
OK, do the exit polls rule OUT any types of fraud or error? |
Land Shark |
Oct-24-05 02:37 PM |
#14 |
| -
Well yes, I think they do |
Febble |
Oct-24-05 03:33 PM |
#19 |
| -
It sounds like after you agreed with my scenario # 5, you are |
Time for change |
Oct-24-05 03:50 PM |
#25 |
| -
I don't quite understand your last sentence |
Febble |
Oct-24-05 04:14 PM |
#28 |
| -
It sounds like you did understand my last sentence, |
Time for change |
Oct-24-05 05:10 PM |
#33 |
| -
OK, I'm lost! |
Febble |
Oct-24-05 05:31 PM |
#36 |
| -
Why scenarios # 1 and # 2 would cause state-wide red shift |
Time for change |
Oct-24-05 03:54 PM |
#26 |
| -
Well, that would depend |
Febble |
Oct-24-05 03:58 PM |
#27 |
| -
Don't you mean that I would be right if turnout was NOT factored in? |
Time for change |
Oct-24-05 05:07 PM |
#32 |
| -
Well I'm really out of my tree here |
Febble |
Oct-24-05 05:28 PM |
#35 |
| -
Joining this late, but: ESI's hypothesis seems bogus on its face. |
sean in iowa |
Oct-25-05 10:41 PM |
#60 |
| -
Well, I agree |
Febble |
Oct-26-05 02:46 AM |
#62 |
| -
welcome, sean! let's step back for a moment... |
OnTheOtherHand |
Oct-26-05 06:00 AM |
#63 |
| -
"Vote Fraud" is a terribly imprecise term |
Land Shark |
Oct-26-05 08:57 AM |
#64 |
| -
umm, I think so, yes |
OnTheOtherHand |
Oct-26-05 04:36 PM |
#65 |
| -
To be honest |
Febble |
Oct-26-05 04:41 PM |
#66 |
| -
well, I'm queasy there myself |
OnTheOtherHand |
Oct-26-05 07:38 PM |
#69 |
| -
Come on Febble! |
Bill Bored |
Oct-26-05 10:13 PM |
#72 |
| -
Here is a model pie chart of a precinct's WPE.... |
kiwi_expat |
Oct-26-05 11:07 PM |
#74 |
| -
Trying tp get the terminlogy clear here |
sean in iowa |
Oct-26-05 06:46 PM |
#67 |
| -
OK |
Febble |
Oct-26-05 07:12 PM |
#68 |
| -
There you go bringing "swing" into it again:) |
sean in iowa |
Oct-26-05 08:23 PM |
#71 |
| -
Well, I'm not convinced.... |
Febble |
Oct-27-05 01:31 AM |
#76 |
| -
Sorry it's taken so long to reply |
sean in iowa |
Oct-27-05 10:49 PM |
#80 |
| -
Guys, I want to play too but will be out of commission for a while. |
eomer |
Oct-26-05 08:13 PM |
#70 |
| -
Come Visit Austin Eomer! Have a computer you can use... |
Melissa G |
Oct-26-05 10:36 PM |
#73 |
| -
Been missing you... |
Febble |
Oct-27-05 01:35 AM |
#77 |
| -
OK, how about this? |
Bill Bored |
Oct-27-05 01:21 AM |
#75 |
| -
I think you are getting somewhere |
Febble |
Oct-27-05 02:18 AM |
#78 |
| -
Makes sense! |
yowzayowzayowza |
Oct-27-05 05:21 AM |
#79 |
| -
You're still misleading w/ invalid analysis! |
sunshinekathy |
Oct-30-05 01:12 AM |
#81 |
| -
Well frankly, Kathy |
Febble |
Oct-30-05 01:48 AM |
#82 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread