You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #10: Why is the AutoMARK system certified to 1990 standards? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
truckin Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-05 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
10. Why is the AutoMARK system certified to 1990 standards?
I may not be reading the NASED list correctly but why is the AutoMARK system certified to 1990 standards when it was just certified in June 2005?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Decertify a DRE today. Episode two. FogerRox  Aug-26-05 08:39 PM   #0 
  - Silly me....  Bill Bored   Aug-26-05 08:54 PM   #1 
  - RECOMMENDed for all to read.  autorank   Aug-26-05 09:15 PM   #2 
  - Thanks guys.........yeah Auto-- no grandfathering-- federal law says no  FogerRox   Aug-26-05 09:31 PM   #4 
  - thanks Rog  WillYourVoteBCounted   Aug-26-05 09:23 PM   #3 
  - the only granfathering that can occur-- HAVA is a federal law--  FogerRox   Aug-26-05 09:33 PM   #5 
  - Roj, YOU are AMAZING!!! You are My Hero!! Nominated!!!  Melissa G   Aug-26-05 09:36 PM   #6 
  - Recommended! Let's start a national movement! nt  tommcintyre   Aug-27-05 08:27 AM   #7 
  - kicked and recommened  bananas   Aug-27-05 08:30 AM   #8 
  - kick  bettyellen   Aug-27-05 08:47 AM   #9 
  - Why is the AutoMARK system certified to 1990 standards?  truckin   Aug-27-05 09:00 AM   #10 
  - Good one Truckin-- I read that too  FogerRox   Aug-27-05 02:14 PM   #13 
  - AutoMARK is part of an Optical Scan system provided by ES&S  truckin   Aug-31-05 09:07 AM   #21 
  - question about list of voting machines  WillYourVoteBCounted   Aug-28-05 02:33 AM   #15 
     - NASED list?  FogerRox   Aug-31-05 10:13 PM   #22 
  - The vendors are in bed with EVERYONE who has anything to do with  Amaryllis   Aug-27-05 10:34 AM   #11 
  - so has anyone brought an anti-trust suit against any of them?  diva77   Sep-06-05 01:37 PM   #26 
  - Kicked and recommended! Go, Foger! n/t  Peace Patriot   Aug-27-05 01:51 PM   #12 
  - Question  kster   Aug-28-05 12:02 AM   #14 
  - there were probably a few lawmakers who were very aware of what the  Melissa G   Aug-28-05 04:53 PM   #17 
  - Question 2  kster   Aug-28-05 01:46 PM   #16 
  - good question--  FogerRox   Aug-29-05 08:36 PM   #20 
     - Diebold appears to have qualified their last submission  jkd   Sep-01-05 11:31 PM   #24 
        - yes -- Diebold has--- I was wrong  FogerRox   Sep-03-05 08:29 PM   #25 
  - kick  tommcintyre   Aug-29-05 06:43 AM   #18 
  - kick.nt  kster   Aug-29-05 09:31 AM   #19 
  - Kick!  btmlndfrmr   Sep-01-05 02:58 PM   #23 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC