| 178. So then why is this called an invisible surge? |
|
Were the voters who appeared for Bush invisible? Were all the polls flawed? Are the machines doing something naughty?
|
| -a "game" about the 2004 election |
OnTheOtherHand |
Aug-21-05 04:29 PM |
#0 |
-
there are also no Bush 2k Zombies allowed just to be fair n/t |
Melissa G |
Aug-21-05 04:44 PM |
#1 |
-
Just a thought, but I'm probably breaking a rule, because I don't |
Time for change |
Aug-21-05 05:21 PM |
#2 |
 -
TfC, the game began, specifically from your objection. |
anaxarchos |
Aug-21-05 05:38 PM |
#3 |
  -
So did I win?? |
Time for change |
Aug-21-05 05:45 PM |
#5 |
   -
I thought so.... n/t |
anaxarchos |
Aug-21-05 05:51 PM |
#6 |
  -
Wait a minute |
Time for change |
Aug-21-05 05:54 PM |
#7 |
 -
Read the thread... |
anaxarchos |
Aug-21-05 06:07 PM |
#8 |
  -
I read the rules thoroughly |
Time for change |
Aug-21-05 06:22 PM |
#10 |
 -
OK TFC..we all think you won which is why we are here in this forum |
Melissa G |
Aug-21-05 06:27 PM |
#11 |
 -
Ok, I'll get over it. |
Time for change |
Aug-21-05 06:52 PM |
#12 |
 -
As far as I understand it you have it right.. No one we know of to date |
Melissa G |
Aug-21-05 07:21 PM |
#13 |
  -
Not ONE mathematical scenario, but many theories and hypotheses |
TruthIsAll |
Aug-21-05 08:14 PM |
#15 |
   -
Hey, you forgot early women voters (who skewed for Kerry) ;) |
tommcintyre |
Aug-22-05 01:07 AM |
#25 |
    -
Thank you, Tom.... I think. n/t |
anaxarchos |
Aug-22-05 10:19 AM |
#35 |
   -
Of TIA's listed theories and hypotheses used to support election results |
Land Shark |
Aug-22-05 08:22 AM |
#28 |
  -
possibly off-topic, but let me respond |
OnTheOtherHand |
Aug-22-05 09:41 AM |
#32 |
  -
Objection m'lud! |
Febble |
Aug-22-05 10:55 AM |
#37 |
  -
LOL! My fingerprints weren't designed to prove I was there either ;) |
tommcintyre |
Aug-22-05 09:48 PM |
#89 |
  -
Re this: |
Febble |
Aug-23-05 05:51 AM |
#111 |
  -
Disqualified: Hyperbole (exaggeration) and false appeals to authorities |
tommcintyre |
Aug-24-05 12:19 AM |
#149 |
  -
It happens to be |
Febble |
Aug-24-05 01:46 AM |
#151 |
   -
Febble, your citing ESI (votewatch) to support ESI (votewatch) |
autorank |
Aug-24-05 02:35 AM |
#152 |
    -
I didn't cite ESI to support ESI |
Febble |
Aug-24-05 05:14 AM |
#158 |
   -
Your "Disclaimer" is a good start |
tommcintyre |
Aug-24-05 03:10 AM |
#155 |
  -
In turn: |
Febble |
Aug-24-05 04:28 AM |
#156 |
  -
There ya go again |
tommcintyre |
Aug-24-05 08:02 AM |
#169 |
  -
Enough already |
Febble |
Aug-24-05 08:35 AM |
#173 |
  -
Wow! You really whacked that one out of context, didn't you? |
tommcintyre |
Aug-24-05 09:24 AM |
#182 |
  -
Oh, drop it tomm |
Febble |
Aug-24-05 09:49 AM |
#183 |
  -
OK, but that was NOT personal information. Dropped n/t |
tommcintyre |
Aug-24-05 09:56 AM |
#186 |
  -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Aug-24-05 02:36 AM |
#153 |
  -
Done |
Febble |
Aug-24-05 04:58 AM |
#157 |
  -
Wow! You really like to stretch things, don't you? |
tommcintyre |
Aug-24-05 06:06 AM |
#161 |
  -
Yes, anyone can search my posts |
Febble |
Aug-24-05 06:49 AM |
#163 |
  -
And... |
tommcintyre |
Aug-24-05 08:43 AM |
#175 |
  -
Well, it has seemed |
Febble |
Aug-24-05 09:19 AM |
#181 |
  -
Actually, they would not have deleted the thread for that reason |
tommcintyre |
Aug-24-05 09:53 AM |
#184 |
  -
tomm |
Febble |
Aug-24-05 10:27 AM |
#188 |
  -
Here's the proof: |
tommcintyre |
Aug-24-05 09:28 PM |
#215 |
  -
Will you stop this, please, tomm? |
Febble |
Aug-25-05 02:14 AM |
#219 |
  -
YOU ASKED FOR PROOF IN A PM TO ME-Glad to stop it |
tommcintyre |
Aug-25-05 08:29 AM |
#221 |
  -
I didn't say non-mathematical -- just non-exit poll related |
Time for change |
Aug-21-05 08:20 PM |
#16 |
 -
ah, heck, I'll give you a trophy, but let's play on... |
OnTheOtherHand |
Aug-21-05 08:05 PM |
#14 |
 -
You convinced me that wasn't needed... |
anaxarchos |
Aug-21-05 08:41 PM |
#17 |
 -
there are at least couple of three folks on this forum who believe |
Melissa G |
Aug-21-05 06:09 PM |
#9 |
 -
Well the attractive thing |
Febble |
Aug-21-05 05:42 PM |
#4 |
-
So nice to see you all playing so well in the sandbox for a change! |
Bill Bored |
Aug-21-05 09:21 PM |
#18 |
-
OK I'm back. |
Bill Bored |
Aug-21-05 10:56 PM |
#19 |
 -
Bill, good point . I have always said that if ONE demographic was bogus.. |
TruthIsAll |
Aug-21-05 11:55 PM |
#20 |
  -
Not quite the timeline I had in mind. |
Bill Bored |
Aug-22-05 03:11 AM |
#26 |
 -
A problem with your electoral scenario |
Time for change |
Aug-22-05 08:46 AM |
#29 |
  -
You are right. |
Bill Bored |
Aug-22-05 12:37 PM |
#39 |
 -
I said nothing here about the 613; "last minute" refers to after 12:22am |
TruthIsAll |
Aug-22-05 09:27 AM |
#31 |
 -
That's interesting, TIA |
Febble |
Aug-22-05 10:11 AM |
#33 |
  -
Technically you are right |
Time for change |
Aug-22-05 10:41 AM |
#36 |
 -
Fair enough |
Febble |
Aug-22-05 11:21 AM |
#38 |
 -
Two ways they could have been involved: |
Bill Bored |
Aug-22-05 12:51 PM |
#40 |
  -
Ha! |
Febble |
Aug-22-05 12:57 PM |
#41 |
 -
Not saying this happened everywhere. |
Bill Bored |
Aug-22-05 01:22 PM |
#46 |
 -
A lot of this depends on where you start. |
Febble |
Aug-22-05 03:15 PM |
#51 |
 -
Most definitely -- There are at least 4 kinds of fraud that wouldn't show |
Time for change |
Aug-23-05 06:41 AM |
#113 |
 -
I'm saying a little bit more than that |
Time for change |
Aug-22-05 01:19 PM |
#44 |
 -
That I will buy. |
Febble |
Aug-22-05 03:59 PM |
#55 |
 -
It's good to know we're on the same page Febble |
Time for change |
Aug-22-05 05:43 PM |
#60 |
 -
Greater, I would say |
Febble |
Aug-22-05 06:02 PM |
#62 |
 -
Well, if things get much worse here I'd have to consider transporting |
Time for change |
Aug-22-05 06:40 PM |
#64 |
 -
And Blair is the leader of the |
Febble |
Aug-22-05 06:49 PM |
#66 |
 -
Well that's the guy you actually "voted" for right? nt |
Bill Bored |
Aug-23-05 12:13 AM |
#106 |
 -
Precisely not |
Febble |
Aug-23-05 03:08 AM |
#109 |
 -
I was referring to Brown! You voted for him by voting for the party. |
Bill Bored |
Aug-23-05 09:49 AM |
#122 |
 -
huh? |
Febble |
Aug-23-05 10:02 AM |
#124 |
 -
TIA, it was well established by MSM and Air America |
Bill Bored |
Aug-22-05 12:59 PM |
#42 |
 -
The reason people decided whether or not to vote had nothing to |
TruthIsAll |
Aug-22-05 02:45 PM |
#50 |
 -
Well, perhaps you will be more comfortable with my response to |
Bill Bored |
Aug-22-05 03:41 PM |
#53 |
 -
Or, calling it for what it is: |
tommcintyre |
Aug-22-05 12:44 AM |
#24 |
 -
yes, I overstated that |
OnTheOtherHand |
Aug-22-05 08:17 AM |
#27 |
-
Couldn't agree more on your first paragraph... |
anaxarchos |
Aug-22-05 10:18 AM |
#34 |
-
I like the hybrid scenario |
Bill Bored |
Aug-22-05 01:48 PM |
#47 |
-
Bill, that's not true. 12:22am 8% Gore to Bush; 10% Bush to Kerry |
TruthIsAll |
Aug-22-05 03:50 PM |
#54 |
-
TIA, I didn't quote this one so how can you say it wasn't true? |
Bill Bored |
Aug-22-05 08:46 PM |
#80 |
-
Not so. Take a look at the 7:33 poll of 11027 |
TruthIsAll |
Aug-22-05 10:04 PM |
#90 |
-
That's what I said: 90% - 91% Y2K party loyalty. Final version, the same. |
Bill Bored |
Aug-22-05 10:42 PM |
#96 |
-
some of us just refuse to let the IMO Lie that Blivet won continue |
Melissa G |
Aug-22-05 10:56 PM |
#98 |
-
Except that Bush went from 8% of Gore votes to 10% in the final. |
TruthIsAll |
Aug-22-05 11:08 PM |
#105 |
-
You're right and there were probably some rounding errors too |
Bill Bored |
Aug-23-05 12:17 AM |
#107 |
-
Here's how to play this: Stick to the facts. |
Dynasty_At_Passes |
Aug-22-05 12:16 AM |
#21 |
 -
Bush won by 3 million votes, NOT 3.5. n / t |
TruthIsAll |
Aug-22-05 12:24 AM |
#22 |
  -
Thanks, edited for clarity. n|t |
Dynasty_At_Passes |
Aug-22-05 12:26 AM |
#23 |
 -
I'm not sure what you're saying |
Time for change |
Aug-22-05 08:53 AM |
#30 |
-
Do we know that for sure? |
Dynasty_At_Passes |
Aug-22-05 08:16 PM |
#77 |
-
That's what I'm saying |
Time for change |
Aug-24-05 07:34 AM |
#166 |
-
So then why is this called an invisible surge? |
Past_World_Doubt |
Aug-24-05 09:01 AM |
#178 |
-
I believe that massive voter fraud was the reason for the Bush "victory" |
Time for change |
Aug-24-05 10:22 AM |
#187 |
-
Whoops -- I meant to say election fraud, not "voter fraud" n/t |
Time for change |
Aug-24-05 11:33 AM |
#192 |
-
Bill, I don't think California voters are/were fickle. Here's why... |
Peace Patriot |
Aug-22-05 01:16 PM |
#43 |
 -
As usual, a lot to consider in your post PP. |
Bill Bored |
Aug-22-05 02:06 PM |
#48 |
-
Ladies and Gentlemen... |
anaxarchos |
Aug-22-05 01:22 PM |
#45 |
 -
is this a "serve"? |
OnTheOtherHand |
Aug-22-05 02:33 PM |
#49 |
-
That, most definitely, is a serve.... |
anaxarchos |
Aug-22-05 03:40 PM |
#52 |
 -
I think that is the basic premise |
OnTheOtherHand |
Aug-22-05 04:13 PM |
#56 |
-
OK then,... the game has begun n/t |
anaxarchos |
Aug-22-05 04:29 PM |
#57 |
-
Before I respond, a question.... |
anaxarchos |
Aug-22-05 06:56 PM |
#67 |
 -
hmm |
OnTheOtherHand |
Aug-22-05 09:06 PM |
#84 |
-
'Snot the point.... |
anaxarchos |
Aug-22-05 10:59 PM |
#99 |
-
whoops, didn't mean to leave you itching |
OnTheOtherHand |
Aug-23-05 04:43 PM |
#137 |
-
Question here OTOH.. 'You were not really given the assignment'.. |
Melissa G |
Aug-22-05 08:12 PM |
#76 |
 -
we play the game to find out or refine what we think |
OnTheOtherHand |
Aug-22-05 09:08 PM |
#85 |
-
Sorry OTOH, can't resist...Tried, but can't... |
Melissa G |
Aug-22-05 10:26 PM |
#92 |
-
of course you could have resisted |
OnTheOtherHand |
Aug-23-05 08:33 AM |
#114 |
-
okay, thanks for the clarification and no, if you give me a hole |
Melissa G |
Aug-23-05 07:15 PM |
#139 |
-
that also seems like pretty circular reasoning to me |
OnTheOtherHand |
Aug-23-05 08:12 PM |
#142 |
-
Sure it is easy to have conversations with people who agree |
Melissa G |
Aug-23-05 10:28 PM |
#146 |
-
I'm not denying that those things happened |
OnTheOtherHand |
Aug-24-05 07:54 AM |
#168 |
-
OTOH, you are not remotely comparing apples to apples.. |
Melissa G |
Aug-24-05 10:03 PM |
#216 |
-
I think you are refuting a point I didn't make |
OnTheOtherHand |
Aug-25-05 08:19 AM |
#220 |
-
This premise is refuted by the exit polls, sort of. |
Bill Bored |
Aug-22-05 08:33 PM |
#78 |
 -
You know how to play this game, BB... n/t |
anaxarchos |
Aug-22-05 11:04 PM |
#102 |
-
How do you reconcile these NES numbers with 2004 raw exit polls |
Time for change |
Aug-22-05 09:27 PM |
#88 |
-
You too, TfC... n/t |
anaxarchos |
Aug-22-05 11:05 PM |
#103 |
-
Seriously, I don't understand your comment to BB or me |
Time for change |
Aug-23-05 06:26 AM |
#112 |
-
Tfc, I'm not sure I understand your question |
OnTheOtherHand |
Aug-23-05 08:41 AM |
#116 |
 -
But I don't think we're talking about "4 years later" |
Time for change |
Aug-23-05 04:16 PM |
#135 |
-
I swear, there is nothing up my sleeve here |
OnTheOtherHand |
Aug-23-05 07:18 PM |
#140 |
-
Then I think you should specify your scenario in more detail |
Time for change |
Aug-23-05 10:07 PM |
#145 |
-
let's see |
OnTheOtherHand |
Aug-24-05 08:19 AM |
#170 |
-
One major problem with this scenario is that it requires |
Time for change |
Aug-24-05 12:24 PM |
#198 |
-
smile (but confused smile) |
OnTheOtherHand |
Aug-24-05 06:15 PM |
#206 |
-
Ah... you two must be SO pleased your game is going so well |
tommcintyre |
Aug-24-05 06:26 PM |
#207 |
-
Please forgive me TfC and my rudeness in answering so late... |
anaxarchos |
Aug-23-05 11:34 PM |
#147 |
-
The rubber has it the road, OTOH. |
TruthIsAll |
Aug-22-05 05:38 PM |
#59 |
 -
let's see... |
OnTheOtherHand |
Aug-22-05 07:07 PM |
#70 |
  -
FALSE RECALL. FALSE RECALL. FALSE RECALL. |
TruthIsAll |
Aug-22-05 07:32 PM |
#73 |
 -
facts are stubborn things n/t |
OnTheOtherHand |
Aug-22-05 08:34 PM |
#79 |
 -
Are you disputing OTOH's facts? |
Febble |
Aug-23-05 03:30 AM |
#110 |
 -
NEWS FLASH! Census 60,000 sample (0.30% MoE): 125.7mm voted in 2004 |
TruthIsAll |
Aug-23-05 08:42 AM |
#117 |
  -
Nice one, TIA. However.... |
Febble |
Aug-23-05 09:45 AM |
#121 |
 -
Those are not facts. 122.26mm votes, 48.69 max Bush 2000 votes are FACTS |
TruthIsAll |
Aug-23-05 09:29 AM |
#119 |
 -
Survey data |
Febble |
Aug-23-05 09:56 AM |
#123 |
  -
My "FACTS" are more believable than your "FACTS" |
TruthIsAll |
Aug-23-05 10:04 AM |
#125 |
 -
And my cherries are bigger than your cherries.... |
Febble |
Aug-23-05 10:27 AM |
#126 |
 -
You would LOVE the exit poll evidence to be irrelevant, wouldn't you? |
TruthIsAll |
Aug-23-05 11:07 AM |
#127 |
 -
No, you are wrong |
Febble |
Aug-23-05 11:52 AM |
#128 |
 -
There is a problem with your assumptions |
mgr |
Aug-23-05 06:49 PM |
#138 |
 -
I like this one. |
Bill Bored |
Aug-24-05 11:03 PM |
#217 |
 -
Absolutely, |
mgr |
Aug-25-05 10:13 AM |
#223 |
 -
CONGRATULATIONS OTOH. YOU HAVE JUST SHOWED US HOW TO MATCH THE BUSH VOTE. |
TruthIsAll |
Aug-22-05 08:01 PM |
#75 |
-
One more thing. This is what Kerry needed to just TIE Bush |
TruthIsAll |
Aug-22-05 08:55 PM |
#81 |
-
I am astonished |
OnTheOtherHand |
Aug-22-05 08:59 PM |
#82 |
-
One thing I don't understand about each of your serves |
Time for change |
Aug-22-05 06:13 PM |
#63 |
 -
His serves are good |
Febble |
Aug-22-05 06:48 PM |
#65 |
-
I don't know what I was thinking about that first serve |
Time for change |
Aug-22-05 06:57 PM |
#68 |
-
No, it's still in play |
Febble |
Aug-22-05 07:10 PM |
#71 |
 -
Don't count on it... n/t |
anaxarchos |
Aug-22-05 10:27 PM |
#93 |
 -
One question... |
Chi |
Aug-23-05 09:42 AM |
#120 |
-
Chi lifts his arms and sniffs his armpits....couldnt be that. n/t |
Chi |
Aug-24-05 09:08 AM |
#180 |
-
Just realised this was addressed to me |
Febble |
Aug-24-05 03:54 PM |
#201 |
-
I don't think it's possible for Gore voters to have said"have it your way" |
Bill Bored |
Aug-24-05 11:29 PM |
#218 |
-
a few things |
OnTheOtherHand |
Aug-25-05 11:12 AM |
#227 |
-
When I said two serves, it was a figure of speech... |
anaxarchos |
Aug-22-05 07:55 PM |
#74 |
-
Let me get this straight... |
Chi |
Aug-22-05 10:48 PM |
#97 |
-
well, the game is a little bit stacked right now |
OnTheOtherHand |
Aug-23-05 12:59 PM |
#130 |
-
OK...let's see if I can be more constructive.... |
Chi |
Aug-23-05 02:02 PM |
#133 |
-
fair question, and thanks |
OnTheOtherHand |
Aug-23-05 04:35 PM |
#136 |
-
To you, every statistic "sloshes" around except your 600-sample NES. |
TruthIsAll |
Aug-23-05 08:08 PM |
#141 |
 -
actually, I think every survey statistic is somewhat sloshy |
OnTheOtherHand |
Aug-24-05 08:28 AM |
#172 |
-
I can see how the party affiliation numbers can be muddy... |
Chi |
Aug-24-05 08:59 AM |
#176 |
-
OK, Gore for Bush04 |
OnTheOtherHand |
Aug-24-05 09:53 AM |
#185 |
-
Best info still says 14.6% too high, IMHO. |
Chi |
Aug-24-05 11:31 AM |
#191 |
-
it's open to interpretation |
OnTheOtherHand |
Aug-24-05 07:02 PM |
#209 |
-
And some things aren't open to interpretation. |
tommcintyre |
Aug-24-05 07:07 PM |
#211 |
-
We interrupt our normal programming for this SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENT |
autorank |
Aug-22-05 04:42 PM |
#58 |
 -
AND AN MOE CALCULATOR, TO BOOT! |
TruthIsAll |
Aug-22-05 05:55 PM |
#61 |
 -
Wow... n/t |
anaxarchos |
Aug-22-05 07:06 PM |
#69 |
 -
I wonder which way those undecideds will break. nt |
Bill Bored |
Aug-22-05 07:27 PM |
#72 |
-
==>ATTENTION -- RULING FROM THE JUDGES--IT'S OFFICIAL |
autorank |
Aug-22-05 09:04 PM |
#83 |
 -
I think you can rule false memory out. |
Dynasty_At_Passes |
Aug-22-05 09:11 PM |
#86 |
-
Right, and it's just memory from the voting booth to the door. |
autorank |
Aug-22-05 09:19 PM |
#87 |
-
Are we done yet? |
TruthIsAll |
Aug-22-05 10:36 PM |
#95 |
-
Do pay attention at the back, there |
Febble |
Aug-23-05 02:29 AM |
#108 |
-
Cite some evidence for MAJOR DECISIONS. |
autorank |
Aug-24-05 03:08 AM |
#154 |
-
Define "real" evidence |
Febble |
Aug-24-05 05:55 AM |
#160 |
-
Evidence |
autorank |
Aug-24-05 11:29 AM |
#190 |
-
OK, then what is your problem |
Febble |
Aug-24-05 11:58 AM |
#195 |
-
I'm an amateur mathematician |
StefanX |
Aug-22-05 10:04 PM |
#91 |
 -
Touche. It really IS that simple. Simple math. Pure logic. Common sense. |
TruthIsAll |
Aug-22-05 10:29 PM |
#94 |
  -
As an amateur mathematician and a computer programmer |
StefanX |
Aug-22-05 11:02 PM |
#100 |
 -
Get the beautiful girls to count the votes. Lots of witnesses then. |
autorank |
Aug-22-05 11:05 PM |
#104 |
 -
Please return and return often. |
autorank |
Aug-22-05 11:02 PM |
#101 |
 -
it depends on the value of "you" |
OnTheOtherHand |
Aug-23-05 08:38 AM |
#115 |
-
Bush was an incumbent with a 48.5% job rating. Envelope, please? |
TruthIsAll |
Aug-23-05 08:58 AM |
#118 |
-
considering some discrepant information |
OnTheOtherHand |
Aug-23-05 12:29 PM |
#129 |
-
I suggest you look at this..and get back to espousing "false recall" |
TruthIsAll |
Aug-23-05 01:00 PM |
#131 |
-
circular reasoning 101 |
OnTheOtherHand |
Aug-23-05 01:36 PM |
#132 |
-
Return of Service.... |
anaxarchos |
Aug-23-05 03:39 PM |
#134 |
 -
whoa there |
OnTheOtherHand |
Aug-23-05 08:30 PM |
#143 |
  -
Just who the hell are these mysterious "political scientists" you keep |
TruthIsAll |
Aug-23-05 08:55 PM |
#144 |
   -
"There are 400 of them, I have a list of their names in my brief case. |
autorank |
Aug-23-05 11:54 PM |
#148 |
    -
No probs, auto |
Febble |
Aug-24-05 06:09 AM |
#162 |
   -
actually... |
OnTheOtherHand |
Aug-24-05 06:51 AM |
#164 |
  -
OTOH, how does your model deal with these categories? |
TruthIsAll |
Aug-24-05 12:42 AM |
#150 |
   -
sorry, is there a question here? |
OnTheOtherHand |
Aug-24-05 06:56 AM |
#165 |
  -
I'm glad you learned something from 43/37, professor. |
TruthIsAll |
Aug-24-05 08:42 AM |
#174 |
  -
seems disingenuous to me |
OnTheOtherHand |
Aug-24-05 09:02 AM |
#179 |
  -
I will answer this directly (soon)... Real life inervenes.... n/t |
anaxarchos |
Aug-24-05 02:04 PM |
#200 |
  -
I'm going to have to suspend my participation... |
anaxarchos |
Aug-24-05 05:23 PM |
#204 |
 -
Below the belt, anax.... |
Febble |
Aug-24-05 05:40 AM |
#159 |
-
An observation from a very biased poster on this thread.. |
TruthIsAll |
Aug-24-05 08:23 AM |
#171 |
-
Two small corrections: |
Febble |
Aug-24-05 09:00 AM |
#177 |
 -
The term "fundie" has been used 7048 topics (GD) since 11-02-04 |
tommcintyre |
Aug-24-05 08:49 PM |
#214 |
-
whoops, we forgot the rule against ad hominems |
OnTheOtherHand |
Aug-24-05 10:39 AM |
#189 |
-
It's a 2X2 square, not a syllogism |
mgr |
Aug-24-05 01:54 PM |
#199 |
-
"A" "game" about the 2004 Election |
Calamity Jayne |
Aug-24-05 07:38 AM |
#167 |
 -
RIP Calamity |
autorank |
Aug-24-05 11:37 AM |
#193 |
-
And she was such a promising star of DU. |
Chi |
Aug-24-05 11:43 AM |
#194 |
-
Good... they are showing up. |
anaxarchos |
Aug-24-05 12:02 PM |
#196 |
-
I think we need a 2 syllable limit to attract more 8) n/t |
Chi |
Aug-24-05 12:11 PM |
#197 |
-
HALF TIME SHOW! Take a break and take this poll! |
Bill Bored |
Aug-24-05 04:30 PM |
#202 |
-
UMMM,.. Anyone know what TIA did to get Tomb stoned? |
Chi |
Aug-24-05 04:56 PM |
#203 |
-
As far as I'm concerned, this game is over period as is other Bull Shit |
autorank |
Aug-24-05 06:13 PM |
#205 |
 -
Then why this post? n/t |
mgr |
Aug-24-05 06:41 PM |
#208 |
-
You are truly "amazing" n/t |
tommcintyre |
Aug-24-05 07:04 PM |
#210 |
-
Very classy comment |
Chi |
Aug-24-05 07:50 PM |
#212 |
 -
Not sure where you are going with this |
mgr |
Aug-25-05 10:52 AM |
#226 |
-
Hmmm, I don't recall kicking someone in the face... |
Chi |
Aug-25-05 11:40 AM |
#229 |
-
. |
autorank |
Aug-24-05 08:22 PM |
#213 |
-
Your expressions of contempt aside, |
mgr |
Aug-25-05 09:48 AM |
#222 |
-
2. I had not realized that you posted upstream |
mgr |
Aug-25-05 10:28 AM |
#224 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Aug-25-05 10:29 AM |
#225 |
 -
I sent an email to the Administrators last night about TIA... |
Chi |
Aug-25-05 11:26 AM |
#228 |
-
I'm locking this |
EarlG |
Aug-25-05 12:52 PM |
#230 |