Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-23-05 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
| -Naysayer Hobson's Choice: Final NEP or rBr? Take your pick. |
TruthIsAll |
Jun-23-05 12:48 AM |
#0 |
-
And why I am not surprised "our friends" have not responded? |
autorank |
Jun-23-05 08:58 AM |
#1 |
 -
Dormant? Why is it dormant? |
WI Independent |
Jun-23-05 12:15 PM |
#11 |
-
I am not a naysayer |
OnTheOtherHand |
Jun-23-05 09:37 AM |
#2 |
 -
You say: "people are known to misreport their past votes"; you believe rBr |
TruthIsAll |
Jun-23-05 10:03 AM |
#4 |
  -
"people are known to misreport their past votes." |
OnTheOtherHand |
Jun-23-05 10:22 AM |
#5 |
 -
OTOH: "Getting bored of it, yes, but not afraid."--then take a hike... |
autorank |
Jun-23-05 11:01 AM |
#8 |
-
unfortunately, it doesn't make perfect sense |
OnTheOtherHand |
Jun-23-05 11:42 AM |
#9 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jun-23-05 12:13 PM |
#10 |
-
of course I have arguments |
OnTheOtherHand |
Jun-23-05 12:33 PM |
#13 |
-
Please point out your positions on election reform. |
autorank |
Jun-23-05 01:36 PM |
#14 |
-
in case you didn't notice |
OnTheOtherHand |
Jun-23-05 01:56 PM |
#15 |
 -
So your position is that of the DNC. Well we're 1/2 way there... |
autorank |
Jun-23-05 03:22 PM |
#17 |
  -
I am sincerely confused. |
OnTheOtherHand |
Jun-23-05 03:49 PM |
#19 |
 -
This has gone "ad hominem" BEFORE we even get to the debate... |
anaxarchos |
Jun-23-05 03:45 PM |
#18 |
 -
No DeLay. The TRUTH is claiming victory RIGHT NOW |
TruthIsAll |
Jun-24-05 04:17 AM |
#29 |
-
WE CARE, EVEN IF YOU DON'T... |
TruthIsAll |
Jun-24-05 02:55 AM |
#26 |
-
I voted for Kerry. Doh. |
OnTheOtherHand |
Jun-24-05 09:49 AM |
#33 |
-
I have sliced and diced the numbers every way from Sunday. |
TruthIsAll |
Jun-24-05 11:31 AM |
#34 |
-
Where is the outrage? |
OnTheOtherHand |
Jun-24-05 02:14 PM |
#38 |
-
You keep calling it sloppy, but you cannot specifically refute a thing. |
TruthIsAll |
Jun-24-05 02:39 PM |
#39 |
-
what is this "based on faith" business, anyway? |
OnTheOtherHand |
Jun-24-05 03:18 PM |
#40 |
-
So what? 43% of 122.3 is still 52.57. I don't care what your poll said. |
TruthIsAll |
Jun-24-05 03:46 PM |
#43 |
-
if you don't care about polls, then you have no argument |
OnTheOtherHand |
Jun-24-05 04:19 PM |
#45 |
-
Uh... he really didn't say he didn't care about polls, did he? |
tommcintyre |
Jun-24-05 04:44 PM |
#46 |
 -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jun-24-05 04:50 PM |
#47 |
 -
OK, so maybe you can explain his position |
OnTheOtherHand |
Jun-25-05 04:45 AM |
#52 |
-
Touchy, touchy.... |
anaxarchos |
Jun-24-05 05:52 PM |
#48 |
-
Do you know how overwhelmingly the odds are stacked against? |
LightningFlash |
Jun-25-05 04:16 AM |
#50 |
-
it is not a mathematical question |
OnTheOtherHand |
Jun-25-05 04:49 AM |
#53 |
-
Actually, one can do exactly that. |
LightningFlash |
Jun-25-05 05:01 AM |
#54 |
-
Self deleted |
Aussie_expat |
Jun-23-05 09:40 AM |
#3 |
-
Does the 43-37 figure apply to the "adjusted" polls? |
Time for change |
Jun-23-05 10:41 AM |
#6 |
 -
Yes, you are right. Mathematically impossible. |
TruthIsAll |
Jun-23-05 11:00 AM |
#7 |
-
TruthIsAll, Possibly a 3)... |
WI Independent |
Jun-23-05 12:23 PM |
#12 |
 -
It was 3168 respondents. Here's a link. |
TruthIsAll |
Jun-23-05 02:37 PM |
#16 |
  -
3) No contradiction |
WI Independent |
Jun-23-05 05:26 PM |
#21 |
 -
Makes no diff. 43% is impossible. MoE = 1/sqrt(3168) = 1.78% |
TruthIsAll |
Jun-23-05 06:18 PM |
#22 |
 -
Disagree... |
WI Independent |
Jun-23-05 07:55 PM |
#23 |
  -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jun-24-05 03:13 AM |
#27 |
 -
Astute observation. Sampling bias could not overcome the gap. |
LightningFlash |
Jun-24-05 03:56 AM |
#28 |
 -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jun-24-05 06:50 AM |
#30 |
 -
Go ahead, set it up. Verify your theory. |
TruthIsAll |
Jun-24-05 07:17 AM |
#31 |
  -
Hmmm... deleted message. |
WI Independent |
Jun-24-05 12:30 PM |
#35 |
 -
That's a copout . Just show us your spreadsheet. |
TruthIsAll |
Jun-24-05 12:47 PM |
#36 |
 -
Fair enough... |
WI Independent |
Jun-24-05 01:14 PM |
#37 |
 -
I admit, I can be gruff, I can err, but my credibility is 100% |
TruthIsAll |
Jun-24-05 03:22 PM |
#41 |
 -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jun-24-05 03:31 PM |
#42 |
  -
x |
TruthIsAll |
Jun-24-05 04:02 PM |
#44 |
 -
OK, to put the record straight: |
Febble |
Jun-25-05 04:00 AM |
#49 |
 -
Excellent math. And it gives us true reasoning to the argument... |
LightningFlash |
Jun-25-05 04:22 AM |
#51 |
 -
" I do not dispute your math." |
autorank |
Jun-25-05 07:30 PM |
#55 |
  -
And also find a fully reproduceable pattern. |
LightningFlash |
Jun-25-05 09:05 PM |
#56 |
 -
Cobb: 34%; Kerry 34%; Bush 30% -- HAMILTON COUNTY |
autorank |
Jun-25-05 10:17 PM |
#57 |
 -
Just doing my little bid of duty to democracy. For a friend. n/t |
LightningFlash |
Jun-26-05 01:12 AM |
#59 |
 -
Febble, my response... |
TruthIsAll |
Jun-26-05 03:13 PM |
#60 |
  -
Posted on Dkos |
Febble |
Jun-26-05 05:30 PM |
#62 |
 -
Febble, I wish you well. You have provided the reasonable doubt. |
autorank |
Jun-26-05 05:48 PM |
#63 |
 -
Thanks, Febble, for your gracious response... |
TruthIsAll |
Jun-26-05 07:27 PM |
#65 |
 -
Febble, one more thing... |
TruthIsAll |
Jun-26-05 05:21 PM |
#61 |
 -
The party line "emerges" -- quickly too. |
autorank |
Jun-24-05 08:30 AM |
#32 |
 -
The two are not mutually exclusive |
mgr |
Jun-27-05 10:22 AM |
#66 |
 -
That was a rough approximation. |
mgr |
Jun-23-05 04:17 PM |
#20 |
-
KICK and Final Grades |
autorank |
Jun-23-05 10:25 PM |
#24 |
 -
kick.nt |
kster |
Jun-24-05 01:57 AM |
#25 |
  -
double kick..nt |
kster |
Jun-26-05 12:46 AM |
#58 |
 -
Modified grades. |
autorank |
Jun-26-05 06:21 PM |
#64 |
-
kick - In tribute to his tremendous contributions - WHY??? :( n/t |
tommcintyre |
Aug-25-05 07:59 PM |
#67 |
-
Kicking for truth, justice, and TIA's invaluable work. |
bleever |
Aug-25-05 10:36 PM |
#68 |