Melissa G
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-18-05 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #100 |
| 106. I will happily cede all enforcement crowns to you auto... |
|
I could never compete with you in the enforcement department anyway
|
| -How do we have engaging, civilized debate around here? |
Melissa G |
Jun-12-05 08:33 PM |
#0 |
-
Don't ask me. |
Jim Sagle |
Jun-12-05 08:37 PM |
#1 |
-
I think what you are asking for is a luxury |
Frances |
Jun-12-05 08:37 PM |
#2 |
 -
Hi Frances, Well...a civilized debate about Election Fraud was what |
Melissa G |
Jun-12-05 08:52 PM |
#4 |
  -
Oh, Man, That is the LAST Thing |
ribofunk |
Jun-12-05 10:25 PM |
#8 |
 -
Ribofunk, i hope you can help improve attitude, However, It is |
Melissa G |
Jun-12-05 10:42 PM |
#10 |
 -
Believe Me, I am Trying |
ribofunk |
Jun-12-05 11:26 PM |
#11 |
 -
I thought that you and I had some good discussion about it. n/t |
Time for change |
Jun-13-05 09:05 PM |
#40 |
 -
Yes, Time for Change, |
ribofunk |
Jun-13-05 11:26 PM |
#46 |
 -
The issue of fair elections is the most bi-partisan issue possible. |
Stevepol |
Jun-16-05 08:21 AM |
#72 |
-
I think that |
Jon_da_brockman |
Jun-12-05 08:38 PM |
#3 |
-
I Would Love a Return to Civility |
evilkumquat |
Jun-12-05 08:59 PM |
#5 |
 -
That's a very difficult question Melissa |
Time for change |
Jun-12-05 10:01 PM |
#6 |
  -
Hi TFC, I guess I started this thread because I was frustrated |
Melissa G |
Jun-12-05 10:39 PM |
#9 |
 -
Hi Evilkumquat! welcome to DU and the 2004 Election Discussion |
Melissa G |
Jun-12-05 10:08 PM |
#7 |
-
If you want to get engaged... |
Bill Bored |
Jun-13-05 12:09 AM |
#12 |
 -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jun-13-05 04:47 AM |
#14 |
  -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jun-13-05 05:36 AM |
#15 |
 -
Hi BB! Good to hear your voice. I have trouble with the magnitude of 9/11 |
Melissa G |
Jun-13-05 09:26 AM |
#17 |
-
Rules of the game |
andym |
Jun-13-05 01:15 AM |
#13 |
 -
an important distinction |
OnTheOtherHand |
Jun-13-05 06:08 AM |
#16 |
-
OTOH, not quite... |
TruthIsAll |
Jun-13-05 09:54 AM |
#18 |
-
Glad you said that part TIA. The number of Folks who know this election |
Melissa G |
Jun-13-05 10:20 AM |
#19 |
-
True believer in fraud here |
helderheid |
Jun-13-05 10:25 AM |
#20 |
 -
"True believer in fraud here" |
kster |
Jun-13-05 01:52 PM |
#25 |
 -
Hi Helder heid! Heard you were doing good stuff this weekend to change |
Melissa G |
Jun-13-05 01:54 PM |
#26 |
-
thank you :) |
helderheid |
Jun-14-05 02:49 PM |
#48 |
-
but that's not what I meant by the terms! |
OnTheOtherHand |
Jun-13-05 10:35 AM |
#21 |
 -
I don't think the status quo is intolerable. I'm pretty happy here. |
Melissa G |
Jun-13-05 01:58 PM |
#27 |
-
I have a dream |
OnTheOtherHand |
Jun-13-05 03:06 PM |
#28 |
 -
The problem with your dream is the term bona fide participants... |
Melissa G |
Jun-13-05 04:05 PM |
#30 |
-
yes, bona fides are always the problem. n/t |
OnTheOtherHand |
Jun-13-05 07:06 PM |
#36 |
-
by the way, we miscommunicated again... |
OnTheOtherHand |
Jun-16-05 10:42 AM |
#75 |
-
the term "true-believer" has a specific connotation |
foo_bar |
Jun-13-05 05:58 PM |
#31 |
 -
I agree with both of you (grin) n/t |
OnTheOtherHand |
Jun-13-05 07:05 PM |
#35 |
 -
Dual connotations for Skeptic and True Believer |
andym |
Jun-19-05 01:26 PM |
#116 |
-
Not so sure about the religious aspect-- |
mgr |
Jun-20-05 11:31 AM |
#120 |
-
Hi Mike,..your reply is an example of a share a beer post.... |
Melissa G |
Jun-20-05 08:43 PM |
#124 |
-
RE: "Not so sure about the religious aspect--" OFF-TOPIC |
andym |
Jun-20-05 10:07 PM |
#125 |
-
Etymologically you are correct, but in current use |
mgr |
Jun-21-05 11:25 AM |
#126 |
-
OFF-TOPIC Current Use of True Believer |
andym |
Jun-21-05 01:15 PM |
#127 |
-
We could go on forever |
mgr |
Jun-21-05 01:40 PM |
#128 |
-
Call me true believer, call me moonbat, call me a coincidence theorist, |
bleever |
Jun-13-05 06:11 PM |
#32 |
 -
Hey Bleever! Call me happy to hang with you while we make racket |
Melissa G |
Jun-13-05 09:05 PM |
#39 |
-
Like the Who's down in Whoville: "We are here, We are Here, WE ARE HERE!" |
bleever |
Jun-13-05 09:07 PM |
#41 |
-
Never Ever Give Up! |
Melissa G |
Jun-13-05 09:26 PM |
#45 |
-
True believer -front and center- |
FogerRox |
Jun-13-05 06:15 PM |
#33 |
-
Hey FogerRox ! sign me up! Congrats on Jersey! n/t |
Melissa G |
Jun-13-05 09:08 PM |
#42 |
-
just doing my job ma'am |
FogerRox |
Jun-14-05 01:07 PM |
#47 |
-
BTW, I still can't read Bruce O'Dell's paper! |
Bill Bored |
Jun-13-05 11:50 AM |
#22 |
 -
I, for one, really enjoy your sense of humor |
OnTheOtherHand |
Jun-13-05 12:20 PM |
#23 |
 -
I have version 6, it works fine |
jkd |
Jun-13-05 01:43 PM |
#24 |
 -
Can get it at home and on my funky work computer |
Melissa G |
Jun-13-05 03:16 PM |
#29 |
  -
Appendix 1 is brilliant and it's the crux of the issue! |
Bill Bored |
Jun-13-05 09:08 PM |
#43 |
 -
If ya PM me an email, I can send you a .doc version. n/t |
Chi |
Jun-13-05 07:57 PM |
#37 |
-
Hiya Chi.... |
anaxarchos |
Jun-14-05 11:23 PM |
#53 |
-
Everyone got covered in Febble |
Chi |
Jun-15-05 10:54 PM |
#66 |
-
Ha... |
anaxarchos |
Jun-16-05 11:44 AM |
#77 |
-
Hey, you can't say things like that ;) |
tommcintyre |
Jun-16-05 07:11 PM |
#80 |
-
Do three "cultists" on one Reply constitute a "civil disturbance" |
autorank |
Jun-16-05 09:34 PM |
#82 |
-
Chi, you are the most amazing writer! I so enjoy it when I |
Melissa G |
Jun-16-05 10:52 PM |
#83 |
-
One little misrepresentation |
mgr |
Jun-17-05 10:17 AM |
#84 |
 -
Rewrite, Version 1.01 |
Chi |
Jun-17-05 03:53 PM |
#88 |
-
And what would you know about that help Chi? |
Melissa G |
Jun-17-05 09:49 PM |
#95 |
 -
Insert Scooby snicker here. (EG) |
Chi |
Jun-17-05 10:52 PM |
#98 |
-
I'll buy it. |
mgr |
Jun-20-05 11:04 AM |
#119 |
-
Alright... now, I need a link here. |
anaxarchos |
Jun-20-05 12:26 PM |
#122 |
-
I hope no "deliberately misleading" |
OnTheOtherHand |
Jun-20-05 11:56 AM |
#121 |
-
What used to be a rock solid backup to election fraud..... |
Chi |
Jun-21-05 02:12 PM |
#129 |
-
There is a reason the Greeks gave their gods human foibles, |
mgr |
Jun-21-05 06:43 PM |
#130 |
-
Are you sure you don't wanna PM me, like everyone else did. |
Chi |
Jun-22-05 10:43 PM |
#131 |
-
following the message board rules is a good start |
Cocoa |
Jun-13-05 06:35 PM |
#34 |
-
Why skeptics and true-believers? |
anaxarchos |
Jun-13-05 08:35 PM |
#38 |
 -
Hi anaxarchos, I like my debate Spicy so I agree with you. |
Melissa G |
Jun-13-05 09:19 PM |
#44 |
 -
Heated, passionate debate can be good |
Time for change |
Jun-14-05 04:32 PM |
#49 |
-
I think a change in policy may be in order. |
mgr |
Jun-14-05 04:41 PM |
#50 |
 -
If posts get deleted because of ad hominem contents, |
Internut |
Jun-14-05 05:26 PM |
#51 |
-
That is one consideration--if rules applied evenly |
mgr |
Jun-15-05 12:59 PM |
#57 |
-
The distinction is meaningless... |
anaxarchos |
Jun-14-05 05:28 PM |
#52 |
-
Good analysis, I would add: |
tommcintyre |
Jun-15-05 01:35 AM |
#55 |
-
Your ignorance is forgiven since you've been away. |
mgr |
Jun-15-05 01:31 PM |
#58 |
-
Mgr, do you ever read what you write... |
anaxarchos |
Jun-15-05 09:45 PM |
#63 |
-
"stream of consciousness? " ROFL! |
tommcintyre |
Jun-15-05 10:31 PM |
#64 |
-
anaxarchos, We may not agree on some things but I really |
Melissa G |
Jun-15-05 11:05 PM |
#67 |
-
Profound thoughts from the School of Democracy. I'm even mellow. |
autorank |
Jun-16-05 01:43 AM |
#71 |
-
Let me rearrange your points |
mgr |
Jun-16-05 11:10 AM |
#76 |
-
Why, mgr... |
anaxarchos |
Jun-16-05 02:02 PM |
#78 |
-
A SUMMARY: Yes, it's all about "framing" (spinning?), isn't it? |
tommcintyre |
Jun-15-05 01:20 AM |
#54 |
 -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jun-15-05 06:45 PM |
#59 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jun-15-05 06:52 PM |
#60 |
 -
Yes.. unfortunately though, it's much more than Pathetic. |
tommcintyre |
Jun-15-05 06:57 PM |
#61 |
-
Ah yes, the innuendo tactic. n/t |
mgr |
Jun-15-05 06:58 PM |
#62 |
-
So you think that person used the "innuendo tactic"? Please explain. |
tommcintyre |
Jun-15-05 10:39 PM |
#65 |
-
Tommcintire, This thread is a thread for folks who want to be polite |
Melissa G |
Jun-15-05 11:10 PM |
#68 |
 -
Melissa G, I think this demonstrates why we have impartial moderators here |
tommcintyre |
Jun-16-05 12:40 AM |
#69 |
  -
Hi Tomm, I'm relatively new to public cyber life and it has been an |
Melissa G |
Jun-16-05 09:02 AM |
#73 |
 -
Imagine you are going 90 mph down a dark, twisty road, and... |
tommcintyre |
Jun-16-05 08:13 PM |
#81 |
 -
Hi Tomm, you actually never answered my question... |
Melissa G |
Jun-17-05 12:24 PM |
#86 |
 -
Ahh... it wasn't really a "worldview"... was it? |
tommcintyre |
Jun-17-05 04:46 PM |
#89 |
 -
Glass illustrates our susceptibility to misleading vividness |
foo_bar |
Jun-17-05 05:12 PM |
#90 |
  -
Example of amplified minor point... and out of context |
tommcintyre |
Jun-17-05 06:15 PM |
#92 |
 -
I didn't actually make a point |
foo_bar |
Jun-17-05 06:18 PM |
#93 |
 -
Actually, his "misleading vividness" was a " wake-up call |
tommcintyre |
Jun-17-05 07:00 PM |
#94 |
 -
I saw it on DVD a year ago |
foo_bar |
Jun-18-05 04:19 AM |
#101 |
 -
Did they all work as hard to manipulatively build loyalties? |
tommcintyre |
Jun-18-05 06:47 AM |
#102 |
 -
I guess I can see where you're coming from |
foo_bar |
Jun-18-05 07:49 AM |
#103 |
 -
THAT, is why I keep saying to watch again with the commentary on. |
tommcintyre |
Jun-18-05 08:12 AM |
#104 |
 -
I'll have to re-rent it |
foo_bar |
Jun-18-05 09:05 AM |
#105 |
 -
So the short version would be.. |
Melissa G |
Jun-17-05 10:31 PM |
#97 |
 -
Hey, is this the "nice" thread, or the "assumptive" one? |
tommcintyre |
Jun-18-05 12:27 AM |
#99 |
 -
Melissa, what about people who call others "paranoid" and "unbalanced" |
autorank |
Jun-16-05 01:33 AM |
#70 |
 -
2nd Time: Melissa G, What about people who call other users "unbalanced" |
autorank |
Jun-17-05 05:50 PM |
#91 |
-
Autorank, I was interested in discussing civil, engaging,debate |
Melissa G |
Jun-17-05 10:24 PM |
#96 |
-
My personal concerns are not relevant to this forum. You don't mind |
autorank |
Jun-18-05 01:05 AM |
#100 |
-
I will happily cede all enforcement crowns to you auto... |
Melissa G |
Jun-18-05 09:15 AM |
#106 |
 -
Weak, this is getting old. |
autorank |
Jun-18-05 12:29 PM |
#108 |
-
With due respect, you are misquoting me on post # 6 |
Time for change |
Jun-18-05 10:00 AM |
#107 |
 -
I quoted you directly, minus the irrelevant material in the parens. |
autorank |
Jun-18-05 12:30 PM |
#109 |
-
Really? |
Time for change |
Jun-18-05 05:36 PM |
#110 |
-
Not "anyone," you specifically. You called an unspecified number of DUers |
autorank |
Jun-19-05 12:17 AM |
#113 |
-
To answer your questions |
Time for change |
Jun-19-05 07:39 AM |
#114 |
-
I rearely interact w/you. "Repeatedly" is a false charge. No more contact |
autorank |
Jun-19-05 11:45 AM |
#115 |
-
I think you are reading far more into the post that you should |
mgr |
Jun-20-05 12:55 PM |
#123 |
-
No, you do. |
mgr |
Jun-16-05 09:36 AM |
#74 |
-
Thanks for the clarification... quite judgmental/assumptive though |
tommcintyre |
Jun-16-05 06:50 PM |
#79 |
-
Sorry friend, but you may wish to consult your post upthread. |
mgr |
Jun-17-05 10:31 AM |
#85 |
-
Way too assumptive on your part |
tommcintyre |
Jun-17-05 03:43 PM |
#87 |
-
"The Sorrow and the Pity" |
autorank |
Jun-15-05 02:17 AM |
#56 |
-
freedom not guaranteed. |
WillYourVoteBCounted |
Jun-18-05 11:48 PM |
#111 |
-
maybe more people should learn some manners |
WillYourVoteBCounted |
Jun-19-05 12:04 AM |
#112 |
-
And the other question is how to reach the others |
Wow |
Jun-19-05 03:19 PM |
#117 |
-
Exactly Wow, find a new person to talk to everyday! |
Melissa G |
Jun-19-05 08:43 PM |
#118 |