You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #79: I'm surprised I even have to debate this with you. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
LightningFlash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-04-05 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #73
79. I'm surprised I even have to debate this with you.
The U.S. F.B.I or some "secret" order doesn't make the Cencus results. The official, confinaggled United States Cencus Bureau makes the results. They have done so by compiling Cencus data for the U.S.A the last 15 years. They probably are more of an expert than some foreign Book Writer, an Engineer, a hundred other people who are not renowned and accredited mathmeticians. That says it all.

They are accurate and in totality, and also state under every certain term that the error rare is.30%, and I'm sure they would be the LAST people to put forward a strange hypothesis like everyone lies to the cencus takers.

Their job is to report the facts instead of cover it up, what you are proposing instead is a conspiracy that would allow "vote fraud theorists" to be duped and then dan-rathered. It's even more out of the question than thinking this election was stolen.

What it provides and clearly demonstrates, is a heavy amount of fraud and areas of sampling bias.

http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/voting/004986.html

"Note how close the given MoE is to the calculated MoE (within
0.02%)using the formula:
MoE= 1/sqrt(n), where n= population size (000)

Census MoE
U.S. Total Pct Pct MoE (000) 1/sqrt(n) Diff
.Total 125,736 58.3 100% 0.30% 377 0.28% 0.02%

.Male 5
8,455 56.3 46.49% 0.40% 234 0.41% -0.01%
.Female
67,281 60.1 53.51% 0.40% 269 0.39% 0.01%

.White alone
106,588 60.3 84.77% 0.30% 320 0.31% -0.01%

..White non-Hispanic alone
99,567 65.8 79.19% 0.30% 299 0.32% -0.02%

.Black alone
14,016 56.3 11.15% 1.10% 154 0.84% 0.26%
.Asian alone
2,768 29.8 2.20% 1.70% 47 1.90% -0.20%
.Hispanic (of any race)
7,587 28.0 6.03% 1.20% 91 1.15% 0.05%

.White alone or in combination
107,930 60.3 85.84% 0.30% 324 0.30% 0.00%
..White non-Hispanic alone or in combination
100,726 65.7 80.11% 0.30% 302 0.32% -0.02%
.Black alone or in combination
14,324 56.1 11.39% 1.10% 158 0.84% 0.26%
.Asian alone or in combination
2,980 30.7 2.37% 1.70% 51 1.83% -0.13%

Table 4a. Reported Voting and Registration of the Total
Voting-Age Population, by Sex, Race and Hispanic Origin, for
States: November 2004
"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC