You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #60: You have just proven to DU why this "reconciliation" project is bogus [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
TruthIsAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 06:37 AM
Response to Reply #47
60. You have just proven to DU why this "reconciliation" project is bogus
Edited on Thu Jun-16-05 06:38 AM by TruthIsAll
You say:
Now if you can show me where I am wrong on the spatial distribution of these events, and show that it does have a bearing on stealing the popular vote, then you are on to something. Otherwise it further cements the position I have staked out since December, that the fraud was specific to battleground states, and its full intent was voter suppression that did not require computers. Evidence that we have had for months.

I say:
"The full intent was voter suppression that did not require computers"? That's bunk. Pure and simple.

Plus, the fraud was NOT limited to battleground states.
And vote switching WAS done by computers.

mgr, you speak in tongues. On the one hand, you now claim to believe fraud cost Kerry the election. This is after you and your partner, the data "re-conciliator", have maligned my analysis with ad hominems all these months.

Now you implicitly confirm the analysis was correct - by saying the election was stolen..

Now you and foo-bar decide to join in with analysis of real data. Forgive me if I am suspicious of your intentions. The impetus for this was the 86 of 88 voting machine switches probability thread, which foo-bar obviously felt he had to respond to - under the guise of further analysis. I can't wait to see the result of this "reconciliation" project.

A prediction: It will NOT come to the obvious conclusion that the voting machines were programmed to switch votes. On the contrary, it will attempt to fog that evidence as well. The proof: You have already stated your intent in the first paragraph of this thread.

That makes the foo-bar "study" irrelevant from the get-go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Prob (86 of 88 screens switch K to B): 1 in 79,010,724,999,066,700,000,000 TruthIsAll  May-15-05 08:32 AM   #0 
  - So many ways of expressing fraud.  Old and In the Way   May-15-05 09:13 AM   #1 
  - LINK TO EIRS  TruthIsAll   May-18-05 11:46 PM   #26 
  - Hey back off!  Botany   May-15-05 09:15 AM   #2 
  - Same as the unexplicable migration of votes, Kerry to Bush, in Snohomish..  understandinglife   May-15-05 05:02 PM   #11 
  - Link please! Hi Botany! n/t  Melissa G   Jun-16-05 12:33 AM   #59 
  - With respect,  Chomp   May-15-05 09:19 AM   #3 
  - Yes, but the exit polls provide overwhelming prima facie evidence...  TruthIsAll   May-15-05 09:27 AM   #4 
  - nominated  helderheid   May-15-05 10:07 AM   #5 
  - ditto!  autorank   May-15-05 03:31 PM   #9 
  - BIG BANG Correction: The UNIVERSE is 14 BILLION years old  TruthIsAll   May-15-05 10:35 AM   #6 
  - From the National Election Incident Database  TruthIsAll   May-15-05 11:16 AM   #7 
  - Thanks, TIA n/t  vince3   May-15-05 04:08 PM   #10 
  - 79 billion trillion = ONE in 79 SEXTILLION = 79*10^21  TruthIsAll   May-15-05 03:23 PM   #8 
  - But. . .but . . .but. . .  stellanoir   May-15-05 06:04 PM   #15 
  - Probability & Statistics should be a high school requirement. n/t  GreenPoet64   May-15-05 05:11 PM   #12 
  - That's an interesting comparison to illustrate the probability. (n/t)  ROH   May-15-05 05:19 PM   #13 
  - Your posts are always a breath of fresh air...  alittlelark   May-15-05 06:02 PM   #14 
  - *Obviously you haven't considered the rBrei theory.  Peace Patriot   May-15-05 06:29 PM   #16 
  - rBrei - that's coming, no doubt. Or eDr -exuberant Dem recorders  TruthIsAll   May-15-05 06:54 PM   #17 
  - Kick. (Warning: caps lock about to be turned on.)  bleever   May-15-05 09:11 PM   #18 
  - there are actually more rumblings about election fraud then in November  FLDem5   May-15-05 09:22 PM   #19 
     - I second the medal for TIA!  kimchi   May-15-05 10:05 PM   #20 
     - Ditto! I'm constantly amazed by his endless energy, and PROOF of E.F.  zann725   Jun-26-05 02:37 AM   #67 
  - 2-4-6-8; EIGHTY-SIX OF EIGHTY-EIGHT  TruthIsAll   May-18-05 08:34 AM   #21 
  - I Worked Early Vote And Personally Observed The ES&S  mhr   May-18-05 09:26 AM   #22 
  - Most likely it was the central tabulator...  LightningFlash   May-18-05 12:36 PM   #24 
     - wrong connection  mgr   Jun-14-05 01:12 PM   #31 
        - Central tabulators and precinct tabulators the culprits in OPTISCAN  Carolab   Jun-15-05 12:50 AM   #43 
           - May want to look at this recent thread  mgr   Jun-15-05 04:50 PM   #54 
              - And you might want to watch Chuck Herrin's presentation  Carolab   Jun-15-05 04:58 PM   #55 
                 - Already had several months ago  mgr   Jun-15-05 07:10 PM   #56 
                    - Bev was talking about remote hacks. There are other means.  Carolab   Jun-15-05 10:34 PM   #57 
                       - Texas, California, Illinois in 1960  mgr   Jun-17-05 12:45 PM   #64 
  - TIA, for what it's worth, I think focusing more on issues like this  smartvoter   May-18-05 12:18 PM   #23 
  - Right, but we need more than a 1/(79*10^21) probability...  TruthIsAll   May-18-05 07:13 PM   #25 
  - kick.nt  kster   May-19-05 01:45 PM   #27 
  - Kick it : Time for Change  TruthIsAll   May-20-05 11:03 AM   #28 
  - 12:1 does not compute to 86:88. n/t  mgr   Jun-14-05 01:17 PM   #33 
  - Remember this?  TruthIsAll   Jun-10-05 04:12 AM   #29 
  - Go ahead, reconcile it.  TruthIsAll   Jun-13-05 07:43 PM   #30 
  - I thought the numbers were  mgr   Jun-14-05 01:13 PM   #32 
  - I believe my numbers are correct. But if it's 87 of 94, the probability is  TruthIsAll   Jun-14-05 01:34 PM   #34 
  - mgr, I amend my previous reply (87-94); Mea culpa. You said 88 of 95...  TruthIsAll   Jun-14-05 03:52 PM   #35 
     - Not interested in the odds, just the numbers be right. n/t  mgr   Jun-14-05 04:38 PM   #36 
        - Of course you're not interested in the odds. Because you can't refute them  TruthIsAll   Jun-14-05 09:51 PM   #37 
           - I can refute them  foo_bar   Jun-14-05 10:28 PM   #38 
           - I don't think you're allowed to mention elementary  Internut   Jun-14-05 10:33 PM   #39 
           - Deleted message  Name removed   Jun-14-05 11:38 PM   #40 
           - if you can't discuss statistics 101 without ad hominem attacks  foo_bar   Jun-15-05 12:08 AM   #42 
           - When will you respond specifically to my three points?  TruthIsAll   Jun-15-05 08:32 AM   #44 
              - sorry for the flip response  foo_bar   Jun-15-05 02:20 PM   #45 
                 - That is a helluva lot of doubletalk.  TruthIsAll   Jun-15-05 02:58 PM   #46 
                    - a brief glossary  foo_bar   Jun-15-05 03:43 PM   #50 
                       - but... but... what about Bigfoot? n/t  OnTheOtherHand   Jun-15-05 04:06 PM   #52 
                          - I saw him last month  mgr   Jun-15-05 04:15 PM   #53 
           - Seventeen from Mahoning County  mgr   Jun-15-05 03:29 PM   #48 
           - Ten From Palm Beach  mgr   Jun-15-05 03:36 PM   #49 
           - But keep kicking the thread....we like that  TruthIsAll   Jun-14-05 11:41 PM   #41 
              - Didn't know you were royalty. n/t  mgr   Jun-15-05 03:56 PM   #51 
              - OK I think I will.............Kick.nt  kster   Jun-15-05 11:38 PM   #58 
           - I'm not interested in the less than meaningful analysis  mgr   Jun-15-05 03:10 PM   #47 
              - You have just proven to DU why this "reconciliation" project is bogus  TruthIsAll   Jun-16-05 06:37 AM   #60 
                 - would you like to audit the project?  foo_bar   Jun-16-05 08:15 AM   #61 
                 - Do Foo Bar a favor  mgr   Jun-16-05 02:06 PM   #62 
                 - I don't believe my arguments relied on ad hominens.  mgr   Jun-16-05 02:27 PM   #63 
  - A gracious and wise kick.  LightningFlash   Jun-25-05 04:55 AM   #65 
  - kick.nt  kster   Jun-26-05 02:30 AM   #66 
  - KICK so the DNC can see!  autorank   Jun-26-05 11:55 AM   #68 
  - Help me out here  Maraya1969   Aug-12-05 11:07 PM   #69 
  - Hope this clears it up.  TruthIsAll   Aug-13-05 06:05 AM   #70 
     - Ok you are talking Ohio when you speak of the 88 voting machines?  Maraya1969   Aug-13-05 01:04 PM   #71 
        - You are totally missing it..  TruthIsAll   Aug-13-05 02:28 PM   #72 
  - kick - In tribute to his tremendous contributions - WHY??? :( n/t  tommcintyre   Aug-25-05 07:34 PM   #73 
  - Kicking for truth, justice, and TIA's invaluable work.  bleever   Aug-25-05 10:31 PM   #74 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC