Reply #2: I've got STRONG Opinions

[rigel99]

we can't let them reframe with "oh that's innocent".

Here's my mantra, where there's smoke there's mirrors. Do we know if wisconsin uses electronic or lever or optiscan or how they vote?

either way, in Georgia which is 100% DRE we are investigating at least 33,000 statewide PHANTOM VOTES (or more machine votes than voters showing up at the polls) and I'm also looking at a potential for 13-14% of the vote being Phantom votes based in individual county data which I have purchased..

My bottom line is for us to ask a few more questions of the election activists in that state:
a. get a isting of by county what technology or method used to vote.
b. start a systematic examination of how those existing 4K votes were 'unexplanably added'. FYI, that's a great way to commit fraud by creating phantom people and would certainly explain the 13M or so extra Bush voters that no one can seem to explain nationwide.

In georgia Cox our SOS estimated a Turnout of 64% statewide, guess what? our turnout was 78% statewide... why would she be off so far and that is a huge percentage 8 out of 10 registered voters voting fully 5% more than our highest voting year ever!!!

I'd love to write a letter to the editor or this Contact Phil Brinkman at [e-mail] or 252-6145. person to tell him we think it's absolutely fraud and here's how...
I have Georgia documentation that can graphically show how phantom votes get created. What happened is we spent $53.9M on computers and they create ElectroChads to replace Hanging Chads (but worse, the electrochads are Phantom votes, meaning they don't correspond to a person voting, so there is no frame of reference from how that vote go there in the first place).


good luck and give me an update on how I can help!!