TruthIsAll
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-24-05 08:37 PM
Response to Original message |
| 58. I'm tired tonight. I think I'll just kick that rGr in the ass... |
| -The Reluctant Gore Responder (RGR) |
TruthIsAll |
May-02-05 12:03 AM |
#0 |
 -
Is this getting back to DailyKos and Febble? |
kansasblue |
May-02-05 12:06 AM |
#1 |
  -
Do you think it should be? If so, you can e-mail it. |
TruthIsAll |
May-02-05 12:09 AM |
#2 |
| -
Well, I'm new to this board |
Febble |
May-02-05 07:35 AM |
#9 |
| -
The question is not the UCSV analysis. It is the facts in this post. |
TruthIsAll |
May-02-05 08:01 AM |
#10 |
| -
Well, to be honest, I don't think they do |
Febble |
May-02-05 08:20 AM |
#11 |
| -
You are avoiding the factual isues I raise in this post. |
TruthIsAll |
May-02-05 08:27 AM |
#12 |
| -
Because they reweighted the data. |
Febble |
May-02-05 09:05 AM |
#13 |
| -
The first weights were "out"? What do you mean by that? They were wrong? |
TruthIsAll |
May-02-05 09:34 AM |
#16 |
| -
I said OUT because you don't like WRONG |
Febble |
May-02-05 10:20 AM |
#19 |
| -
They didn't match WHAT? THE VOTES? WHAT IF THE VOTE COUNT WAS WRONG? |
TruthIsAll |
May-02-05 11:08 AM |
#24 |
| -
When I reweighted the state data to the votes, Kerry won.. |
TruthIsAll |
May-02-05 09:48 AM |
#17 |
| -
Well in that case |
Febble |
May-02-05 10:22 AM |
#20 |
| -
You are flailing, Febble. I show the results to the nearest .01% |
TruthIsAll |
May-02-05 11:07 AM |
#23 |
| -
Yes, they are too accurate. |
Febble |
May-02-05 11:34 AM |
#26 |
| -
Dupe delete |
TruthIsAll |
May-02-05 11:54 AM |
#28 |
| -
Is the standard 95% C.L. good enough for you... |
TruthIsAll |
May-02-05 11:58 AM |
#29 |
| -
99% is appropriate for 50 states. |
Febble |
May-02-05 12:49 PM |
#31 |
| -
95% is the standard; we are looking at 2 standard deviations from the mean |
TruthIsAll |
May-02-05 01:56 PM |
#33 |
| -
If you have fifty states |
Febble |
May-02-05 02:05 PM |
#34 |
| -
The prob = 1/40 (2.50%)for a one-tail test , and the law of large numbers |
TruthIsAll |
May-02-05 02:57 PM |
#35 |
| -
All that is true. |
Febble |
May-02-05 03:00 PM |
#36 |
| -
Here is a Z-score probability analysis |
TruthIsAll |
May-02-05 04:03 PM |
#37 |
| -
And what factor did you use |
Febble |
May-02-05 04:31 PM |
#38 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
May-02-05 06:21 PM |
#40 |
| -
The same one that Mitofksky used in the National Exit Poll: ZERO |
TruthIsAll |
May-02-05 06:41 PM |
#42 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
May-02-05 06:46 PM |
#43 |
| -
OK |
Febble |
May-02-05 04:51 PM |
#39 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
May-02-05 12:11 AM |
#3 |
| -
fine... I'll move on to 2006 |
kansasblue |
May-02-05 12:17 AM |
#6 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
May-02-05 12:22 AM |
#7 |
| -
I see |
kansasblue |
May-02-05 12:15 AM |
#4 |
| -
This line explains so much about election fraud. Kick & Recommended |
autorank |
May-02-05 12:16 AM |
#5 |
| -
No one cares to discuss this. It's not rocket science, either. |
TruthIsAll |
May-02-05 01:04 AM |
#8 |
| -
Do you know the mean response rates |
Febble |
May-02-05 09:12 AM |
#14 |
| -
So far, your response rate in explaining the 19 facts is ZERO. |
TruthIsAll |
May-02-05 09:21 AM |
#15 |
| -
I give up. |
Febble |
May-02-05 10:02 AM |
#18 |
| -
Your responses have me convinced. |
TruthIsAll |
May-02-05 10:26 AM |
#21 |
| -
Before you both give up, could you answer two quick questions? |
pgh_dem |
May-02-05 10:50 AM |
#22 |
| -
OK |
Febble |
May-02-05 11:25 AM |
#25 |
| -
I gotcha, but... |
pgh_dem |
May-02-05 11:43 AM |
#27 |
| -
Yes, that's exactly the point. |
Febble |
May-02-05 12:44 PM |
#30 |
| -
By the way, in case no one else has said so, |
bleever |
May-02-05 06:37 PM |
#41 |
| -
I agree.. but I also believe that the NEP time line from 8349 to 13660 |
TruthIsAll |
May-02-05 01:48 PM |
#32 |
| -
Kick for more discussion |
TruthIsAll |
May-03-05 09:28 AM |
#44 |
| -
Thanks to both of you TIA & Febble for replies |
pgh_dem |
May-03-05 10:22 AM |
#45 |
| -
We don't need the weighting |
Febble |
May-03-05 10:49 AM |
#46 |
| -
Don't know about that (RE: E-M corruption) |
pgh_dem |
May-03-05 11:22 AM |
#47 |
| -
I agree that peer-review |
Febble |
May-03-05 12:22 PM |
#48 |
| -
Confidentiality at stake? Or Democracy? Which is more important? |
TruthIsAll |
May-03-05 12:26 PM |
#49 |
| -
criminal conduct of course prefers confidentiality! at all costs n/t |
intensitymedia |
May-03-05 12:56 PM |
#50 |
| -
Knowing your vote is private is important... |
pgh_dem |
May-03-05 01:35 PM |
#51 |
| -
I have an inbuilt sympathy with the position |
Febble |
May-03-05 02:19 PM |
#53 |
| -
It was not obvious on 5/2; we did not know then that you were an E-M shill |
TruthIsAll |
May-25-05 07:05 AM |
#61 |
| -
A lawyer's take on confidentiality |
davidgmills |
May-03-05 02:13 PM |
#52 |
| -
PLEASE JUST STOP! |
autorank |
May-03-05 02:47 PM |
#54 |
| -
Ya what "autorank" said......n/t |
kster |
May-03-05 07:34 PM |
#55 |
| -
Are you inferring that the Exit poll was wrong, because it wasn't. |
passy |
May-25-05 02:09 AM |
#60 |
| -
We can now match the NEP data to actual precincts. |
kiwi_expat |
May-03-05 08:29 PM |
#56 |
| -
Correct link... |
kiwi_expat |
May-03-05 10:08 PM |
#57 |
| -
I'm tired tonight. I think I'll just kick that rGr in the ass... |
TruthIsAll |
May-24-05 08:37 PM |
#58 |
| -
kick.nt |
kster |
May-25-05 01:26 AM |
#59 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread