I printed it out, and critiqued/annotated it.
Taking EVERYTHING into consideration (the total "environment" in which this paper exists), I am leaning toward the concept of "red herring", rather than "straw man".
A red herring is defined as:
"Something that draws attention away from the central issue."
http://www.answers.com/topic/red-herring"...an irrelevant or immaterial... issue."
http://www.legal-definitions.com/Q%20R/red-herring.htm<word origin:>
"...drag a red herring across the trail to mislead the dogs.
http://www.wordorigins.org/wordorr.htm------------
Whether it is your intention or not, support/promotion of the rBr "guess" fuels the Bush regime's attempt to create doubt that the exit poll discrepancy points to fraud - as, historically, it does.
Further, contrary to your statement from the post above: "I am not supporting the rBr."; the following statement from page 21 of your paper indicates otherwise:
"The pattern instead is consistent with the E-M hypothesis of “reluctant Bush responders”..."http://www.geocities.com/lizzielid/WPEpaper.pdfI think THAT is about the clearest declarative statement I've heard from you so far. ;)
And Febble, you can mince words all you want about the testability of rBr. The fact of the matter is
you can only infer the validity of this hypothesis - you can NEVER verify it. Read below for more on this:
Experiments vs. Surveys
EXPERIMENTS
Collection of data from observations sampled from a population that are either treated or controlled by the experimenter.
<Inducing the rr to reveal who they actually voted for would've been the best application of this idea - unfortunately, the time has past forevermore for this to be done.>SURVEYS
Examination of a system already in operation <the data you are working with from E-M> in which the investigator does not have the opportunity to assign individuals to different conditions.
<This ALL that can be done now, using inferential statistics.>-----------
Experiments vs. Surveys
Both are valid forms of analysis, but each
varies in approach and each has their
respective pitfalls and caveats.
-
Surveys not as clear-cut as experiments.-
Experiments always preferred when possible.- Surveys are useful for establishing patterns.
-
Experiments must be used to verify patterns.From:
"The Scientific Method & Basic Statistical Procedures"
http://www.plantbio.ohiou.edu/epb/instruct/quantmet/lectures/pdf/lec6.pdfSince you can not EVER verify the rBr (since that time has past, and can never be recovered), the very idea is rendered moot.