You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #51: You know [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
forgethell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 07:04 AM
Response to Reply #50
51. You know
thisis an old debating trick. Try to lead the opponent into self-contradictory statements.

No, I do not think we have any valid evidence.

Yes, I consider circumstantial evidence valid. However, there may be alternate explanations for it.

No, I do not consider that the amount of ccircumstantial evidence to constitute pproof. It must be relevant. It must have some validity.

I don't know how to be any clearer. I would consider any evidence, but we don't have any. Only opinion.I think you understand where I stand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC