Reply #46: I'm simply trying to understand your opinion.

[Chi]

Since the major subject of the topic was about proof, I simply wanted to get an idea of your opinion on some basic definitions/understandings.

I'm not criticizing your opinion, just trying to understand it.

If your opinion is that circumstantial evidence outside a courtroom can never produce proof, so be it.
If your opinion is there is no valid 'evidence' of election fraud (never mind proof), so be it as well.

At least I understand it now.