You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #36: Well said Peace Patriot, well said. ... n/t [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
Chi Donating Member (921 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-05 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #22
36. Well said Peace Patriot, well said. ... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -The anti fraud argument is backwards. yourout  Apr-10-05 09:59 PM   #0 
  - No, the default  forgethell   Apr-10-05 10:01 PM   #1 
  - Nope. Burden is on government, since duty is on da govt  Land Shark   Apr-11-05 01:24 AM   #15 
  - On the other hand,  forgethell   Apr-11-05 08:07 AM   #16 
     - The limits on freedom of speech are very limited, only defamation  Land Shark   Apr-11-05 09:28 AM   #19 
        - As I said, anybody can say  forgethell   Apr-11-05 09:54 AM   #21 
           - You got it all wrong when parties withhold evidence, the burden  Land Shark   Apr-11-05 10:48 PM   #34 
           - There are a few problems with your analysis.  Stevepol   Apr-15-05 08:31 AM   #66 
  - No in the real world...  Blue Shark   Apr-11-05 02:45 PM   #24 
     - Still, if the customer  forgethell   Apr-11-05 03:02 PM   #25 
        - Yes...  Blue Shark   Apr-11-05 07:53 PM   #31 
           - Yes indeedy,  forgethell   Apr-11-05 09:42 PM   #32 
              - forget it, forgethell  Land Shark   Apr-12-05 11:20 AM   #37 
                 - First prove  forgethell   Apr-13-05 11:55 AM   #41 
  - You are correct sir.  Dr_eldritch   Apr-10-05 10:02 PM   #2 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Apr-10-05 10:04 PM   #3 
  - Prove that my $20 is real..  yourout   Apr-10-05 10:07 PM   #5 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   Apr-10-05 10:20 PM   #7 
     - Kewl example  Chi   Apr-10-05 11:33 PM   #11 
        - Deleted message  Name removed   Apr-10-05 11:47 PM   #12 
        - Who introduced the strawman?  eomer   Apr-10-05 11:54 PM   #13 
           - Thanx eomer 8)  Chi   Apr-11-05 08:13 AM   #17 
              - BUH- BYE! Don't know when I've been happier to see someone  Melissa G   Apr-11-05 09:53 PM   #33 
                 - I agree  Chi   Apr-11-05 11:08 PM   #35 
                    - It was a good chuckle...But I thought your ATM response was superb! n/t  Melissa G   Apr-12-05 11:40 AM   #38 
        - To which I'd have had to say that I want to see the day audits to  igil   Apr-11-05 02:12 PM   #23 
           - Go ahead and try it......  Chi   Apr-11-05 03:11 PM   #26 
     - No you don't.  forgethell   Apr-10-05 10:23 PM   #8 
  - Agreed! even with oblivious media non coverage  Melissa G   Apr-10-05 10:05 PM   #4 
  - This I agree with - prove the Electoral process is as sound as it CAN be.  FreepFryer   Apr-11-05 12:05 AM   #14 
     - This I can agree with.  forgethell   Apr-11-05 03:15 PM   #28 
  - Well, with Bush approval rating in the low 40s  Dhalgren   Apr-10-05 10:16 PM   #6 
  - Could it be proven for any election ever?  LoZoccolo   Apr-10-05 10:34 PM   #9 
  - You cannot prove the absence of fraud. It is an ontological truism.  FreepFryer   Apr-10-05 11:28 PM   #10 
  - Elections have two parts...  yourout   Apr-11-05 08:28 AM   #18 
  - Touche' yourout, touche'  Land Shark   Apr-11-05 09:31 AM   #20 
  - That's in a court.  forgethell   Apr-11-05 03:16 PM   #29 
     - Yes but sometimes the burden shifts, forgethell, so go to law school n/t  Land Shark   Apr-12-05 03:26 PM   #39 
        - Not on this issue  forgethell   Apr-13-05 11:38 AM   #40 
           - Quick question, hope I'm not intruding.  Chi   Apr-13-05 12:28 PM   #42 
              - Perhaps,  forgethell   Apr-13-05 12:42 PM   #43 
                 - So, I can infer from your statement...  Chi   Apr-13-05 02:01 PM   #44 
                    - I'm saying  forgethell   Apr-13-05 03:17 PM   #45 
                       - I'm simply trying to understand your opinion.  Chi   Apr-13-05 03:54 PM   #46 
                       - I don't think that you do.  forgethell   Apr-13-05 06:54 PM   #48 
                          - Well, to understand I would ask this...  Chi   Apr-13-05 10:35 PM   #50 
                             - You know  forgethell   Apr-14-05 07:04 AM   #51 
                                - Actually, the way I look at it....  Chi   Apr-14-05 08:09 AM   #52 
                                   - OK, now I'm confused.  forgethell   Apr-14-05 09:39 AM   #54 
                                      - Crystal clear 8)  Chi   Apr-14-05 11:28 AM   #58 
                                         - Well, it wouldn't, by itself,  forgethell   Apr-14-05 06:17 PM   #61 
                                            - Sorry for the delay...  Chi   Apr-15-05 08:15 AM   #64 
                                               - Well, I've  forgethell   Apr-15-05 08:25 AM   #65 
                                               - Well....  Chi   Apr-15-05 08:43 AM   #67 
                                               - We seem to have  forgethell   Apr-15-05 03:06 PM   #74 
                                               - Actually...  Chi   Apr-16-05 09:14 AM   #78 
                                               - I'll read the report's,  forgethell   Apr-16-05 12:18 PM   #80 
                       - What happens when  starmaker   Apr-13-05 04:11 PM   #47 
                          - I just thin we haven't  forgethell   Apr-13-05 06:55 PM   #49 
  - Here's the thing.  forgethell   Apr-11-05 03:11 PM   #27 
  - forgethell, you are absolutely wrong. ELECTIONS MUST BE TRANSPARENT,  Peace Patriot   Apr-11-05 02:09 PM   #22 
  - Yes, maybe but  forgethell   Apr-11-05 03:23 PM   #30 
  - forgethell, I DO agree that the Democratic Party needs strong reform,  Peace Patriot   Apr-14-05 10:58 AM   #56 
  - Well said Peace Patriot, well said. ... n/t  Chi   Apr-11-05 11:11 PM   #36 
  - we have plenty of proof  mopinko   Apr-14-05 08:41 AM   #53 
  - No, mopinko, the Constitution does not say that.  PaganPreacher   Apr-14-05 10:54 AM   #55 
     - If I was a  kster   Apr-14-05 11:25 AM   #57 
     - Kster, what evidence has convinced you...  PaganPreacher   Apr-14-05 11:30 AM   #59 
     - That's ludicrous. There have been many egregious violations by OH SoS,  FreepFryer   Apr-14-05 06:37 PM   #62 
        - I'm not whitewashing, FF.  PaganPreacher   Apr-15-05 11:36 AM   #69 
           - Is it just an allegation...  eomer   Apr-15-05 12:24 PM   #70 
              - At this time, it is still "alleged."  PaganPreacher   Apr-15-05 12:42 PM   #71 
                 - That's very funny...  eomer   Apr-15-05 01:51 PM   #72 
                    - There was no switcheroo, eomer.  PaganPreacher   Apr-15-05 02:53 PM   #73 
                       - Go back and read your first post.  eomer   Apr-15-05 03:17 PM   #75 
                          - You're right, eomer...  PaganPreacher   Apr-15-05 03:50 PM   #76 
                             - So eyewitness reports of official recount observers...  eomer   Apr-15-05 03:57 PM   #77 
     - many claims are probably provable in court.  mopinko   Apr-14-05 11:43 AM   #60 
     - A preponderance can consist of a few facts and a bunch of  Land Shark   Apr-14-05 10:03 PM   #63 
        - So, does that trial strategy work for you, counselor?  PaganPreacher   Apr-15-05 10:12 AM   #68 
           - yes, it works for me, but  Land Shark   Apr-16-05 10:54 AM   #79 
  - Oil Companies Commit Price Fraud Every Day  NewsHound123   Apr-16-05 12:24 PM   #81 
  - Your in.  LatePeriduct   Apr-16-05 06:29 PM   #82 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC