Chi
(921 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-15-05 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #146 |
|
"I flatly deny any voter suppression occured. If you and anyone else who thinks suppresion ocurred can step back ang give the situation an honest evaluation, you will see that the evidence is very, very thin for conspiracy believers to stand on."
That pretty much covers it for me. You said it didn't happen, so I guess it didn't (no need for proof).
You should read your tag line sometime, I think you just hit the ground doing 170mph.
|
| -Republican friend debunks Exit Polls - He says - What would you say? |
BamaBecky |
Jan-12-05 07:29 PM |
#0 |
-
tell him he knows little about statistics and less about exit polls |
papau |
Jan-12-05 07:33 PM |
#1 |
 -
As TIA has finally admitted |
Lurker321 |
Jan-12-05 07:38 PM |
#3 |
-
You are twisting what TIA has written |
DELUSIONAL |
Jan-12-05 07:42 PM |
#5 |
 -
I asked him which of the theories on why raw exit polls |
Lurker321 |
Jan-12-05 07:48 PM |
#9 |
  -
The Stats do not lie - but liars try to explain away the stats |
papau |
Jan-12-05 07:52 PM |
#13 |
 -
Repukes are good at twisting |
rdmccur |
Jan-12-05 09:39 PM |
#59 |
 -
Yes, that is the way he responds.... |
euler |
Jan-12-05 11:53 PM |
#75 |
-
Skewed toward Dem can and should be interpreted as more GOP cheating |
papau |
Jan-12-05 07:47 PM |
#7 |
 -
What do you mean it was not on the level of 6 million votes? |
Lurker321 |
Jan-12-05 07:51 PM |
#11 |
  -
The MOE of an exit poll allows for a million vote swing -your |
papau |
Jan-12-05 07:54 PM |
#14 |
 -
Ok - you made me go and look up the numbers |
Lurker321 |
Jan-12-05 08:12 PM |
#23 |
 -
nope - I do not - but do share your links |
papau |
Jan-12-05 08:26 PM |
#30 |
 -
here you go |
Lurker321 |
Jan-12-05 08:33 PM |
#33 |
 -
Sorry - but you have not posted a link to exit polls that were in error |
papau |
Jan-12-05 09:49 PM |
#60 |
 -
My numbers came from |
Lurker321 |
Jan-12-05 09:54 PM |
#62 |
 -
Unwieghted raw data proves nothing - learn a bit of sampling theory |
papau |
Jan-12-05 10:06 PM |
#64 |
 -
The data that TIA and all the other "exit polls are always accurate" |
Lurker321 |
Jan-12-05 10:11 PM |
#66 |
 -
Well we agree as to the value of "Unweighted raw data proves nothing" |
papau |
Jan-12-05 10:21 PM |
#67 |
 -
First of all, we have no idea which data TIA is using - |
Lurker321 |
Jan-12-05 10:43 PM |
#68 |
 -
I agree :-) |
papau |
Jan-13-05 07:20 AM |
#87 |
 -
Ooops!...the naysayers found a professional statistician... |
RaulVB |
Jan-12-05 08:06 PM |
#20 |
-
By sheerest coincidence-- |
eridani |
Jan-13-05 06:19 AM |
#84 |
 -
When do you think exit polls were |
Lurker321 |
Jan-13-05 07:57 AM |
#90 |
 -
Not in 1988 |
Mistwell |
Jan-13-05 04:24 PM |
#93 |
-
Not polling stations, but electronic tabulators n/t |
eridani |
Jan-13-05 09:55 PM |
#106 |
-
Are you serious? |
Mistwell |
Jan-13-05 11:16 PM |
#109 |
-
Massive and/or grand isn't necessary to achieve the goal |
eridani |
Jan-14-05 04:23 AM |
#110 |
-
Dude...it has to be massive |
Mistwell |
Jan-14-05 01:23 PM |
#121 |
-
There is nothing constructive in picking on TIA |
Heath.Hunnicutt |
Jan-13-05 04:43 PM |
#95 |
-
You twisted, I'll SHOUT. I admitted nothing. And you know it. |
TruthIsAll |
Jan-13-05 06:17 PM |
#103 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jan-14-05 01:46 PM |
#122 |
-
ask him why Ukraine's exit polls were believable but ours our not |
Skittles |
Jan-12-05 07:36 PM |
#2 |
 -
Ukrainian polls |
Lurker321 |
Jan-12-05 07:40 PM |
#4 |
  -
"Washington Monthly" |
RaulVB |
Jan-12-05 07:48 PM |
#10 |
   -
Where in the post that you responded to |
Lurker321 |
Jan-12-05 07:52 PM |
#12 |
  -
YOU CANNOT BE SERIOUS!!! |
RaulVB |
Jan-12-05 07:55 PM |
#16 |
  -
Accidentally gave the wrong link |
Lurker321 |
Jan-12-05 08:03 PM |
#17 |
  -
That speaks a lot about your "credentials"! |
RaulVB |
Jan-12-05 08:04 PM |
#18 |
  -
riiiiiiiiight |
Skittles |
Jan-12-05 07:55 PM |
#15 |
   -
Are you disputing the numbers I gave? |
Lurker321 |
Jan-12-05 08:05 PM |
#19 |
  -
not answering my question |
Skittles |
Jan-12-05 08:20 PM |
#27 |
   -
just as you're not addressing my point |
Lurker321 |
Jan-12-05 08:24 PM |
#29 |
  -
LOL, whatever |
Skittles |
Jan-12-05 08:28 PM |
#31 |
   -
From what I understand |
Lurker321 |
Jan-12-05 08:38 PM |
#37 |
  -
wanted to see if you were a one-trick pony |
Skittles |
Jan-12-05 08:40 PM |
#39 |
  -
There were reports of quite a bit of fraud |
davidgmills |
Jan-14-05 05:56 PM |
#133 |
  -
Can you give me the REAL |
Karenca |
Jan-12-05 08:30 PM |
#32 |
  -
screenname should say it all |
Faye |
Jan-12-05 08:34 PM |
#34 |
   -
Ha, ha...Faye! (n/t) |
RaulVB |
Jan-12-05 08:35 PM |
#35 |
   -
Hi Faye! |
Karenca |
Jan-12-05 08:40 PM |
#38 |
  -
The REAL reason: |
Lurker321 |
Jan-12-05 08:36 PM |
#36 |
  -
there's lots of evidence to show the election was stolen |
Skittles |
Jan-12-05 08:43 PM |
#40 |
   -
there were a lot of problems with this election |
Lurker321 |
Jan-12-05 08:47 PM |
#44 |
  -
actually, there is plenty of hard evidence |
Skittles |
Jan-12-05 08:51 PM |
#46 |
  -
That's so funny that you try to correct that.... |
Karenca |
Jan-12-05 08:43 PM |
#42 |
   -
Ha, ha...Karen! (n/t) |
RaulVB |
Jan-12-05 08:46 PM |
#43 |
   -
It may have been a "known fact" to you - |
Lurker321 |
Jan-12-05 08:49 PM |
#45 |
  -
You saw ours already ........... over and over again.... |
Karenca |
Jan-12-05 08:56 PM |
#47 |
   -
Well, yes, I am kinda hoping that presentation of |
Lurker321 |
Jan-12-05 09:04 PM |
#51 |
  -
Talk about stupid assumptions.. |
davidgmills |
Jan-14-05 06:07 PM |
#136 |
  -
maybe i need to copy & paste, but: you are wasting your time |
Faye |
Jan-12-05 08:58 PM |
#48 |
  -
of course there is other evidence, |
Lurker321 |
Jan-12-05 09:06 PM |
#53 |
  -
a test for you |
zapped 1 |
Jan-15-05 03:49 PM |
#151 |
  -
Re: Keep trying to correct misinformation about exit polls |
davidgmills |
Jan-16-05 08:52 AM |
#158 |
  -
you have yet to post a link to the exit poll data you say was wrong |
papau |
Jan-12-05 09:54 PM |
#61 |
  -
I did now - and do you expect that your posts will be answered |
Lurker321 |
Jan-12-05 09:56 PM |
#63 |
  -
Good point - and it is time for bed! :-) But the point as to exit poll |
papau |
Jan-12-05 10:08 PM |
#65 |
  -
And here's the data from the 04 Presidential race |
Time for change |
Jan-14-05 04:35 PM |
#127 |
 -
Senate resolution concerning Ukraine based in part on exit polls |
Danish Reporter |
Jan-13-05 12:09 AM |
#76 |
 -
I will......thanks |
BamaBecky |
Jan-13-05 06:01 AM |
#82 |
-
whether the exit polls were wrong or right |
Faye |
Jan-12-05 07:47 PM |
#6 |
 -
He said "this" about......"all that"........as Seinfeld would say |
BamaBecky |
Jan-13-05 06:13 AM |
#83 |
-
Two things: |
RaulVB |
Jan-12-05 07:47 PM |
#8 |
 -
I don't have any Repuke friends either!...Ick!! ....nt |
Karenca |
Jan-12-05 08:22 PM |
#28 |
-
Exit polls are ok for the rest of the world and Ukraine, but our |
EVDebs |
Jan-12-05 08:10 PM |
#21 |
-
I am somewhat sure the discrepency lies here: |
meganmonkey |
Jan-12-05 08:11 PM |
#22 |
 -
Correct |
RaulVB |
Jan-12-05 08:16 PM |
#25 |
  -
Thanks for adding a conclusion to my babbling!!! |
meganmonkey |
Jan-12-05 08:18 PM |
#26 |
 -
thanks.....very helpful |
BamaBecky |
Jan-12-05 09:00 PM |
#49 |
  -
No prob! I hope it helps |
meganmonkey |
Jan-12-05 09:14 PM |
#54 |
 -
Here are the state exit poll sample size..and much more |
TruthIsAll |
Jan-15-05 10:23 AM |
#142 |
-
What evidence is there that Bush won this election? |
nmoliver |
Jan-12-05 08:13 PM |
#24 |
 -
Great post! |
RaulVB |
Jan-12-05 08:43 PM |
#41 |
 -
thank you...very helpful |
BamaBecky |
Jan-12-05 09:02 PM |
#50 |
 -
Many other points could be made about the exit polls as well. |
Stevepol |
Jan-12-05 09:06 PM |
#52 |
  -
Let's see - |
Lurker321 |
Jan-12-05 09:15 PM |
#55 |
 -
I'm sorry, Freeman article page 7-8 counters you |
ccarter84 |
Jan-12-05 11:14 PM |
#71 |
  -
Here are the links that show results and exit polls of June, 2004 |
Lurker321 |
Jan-12-05 11:48 PM |
#74 |
 -
The European Parliament .... |
southwood |
Jan-13-05 02:59 AM |
#79 |
 -
Yet Freeman uses the European Parliament |
Lurker321 |
Jan-13-05 07:22 AM |
#88 |
 -
Well,.. |
southwood |
Jan-13-05 03:25 PM |
#91 |
 -
Completely bogus argument about the German elections. |
thanatonautos |
Jan-14-05 06:08 AM |
#111 |
 -
Sorry, that is incorrect |
Kellanved |
Jan-14-05 04:13 PM |
#124 |
 -
Discrepancy |
southwood |
Jan-14-05 04:51 PM |
#129 |
 -
depends on the institute |
Kellanved |
Jan-14-05 05:04 PM |
#130 |
 -
your first link refers to pre-election polls, not exit polls! |
southwood |
Jan-14-05 05:24 PM |
#131 |
 -
I've added a link with Exit poll data |
Kellanved |
Jan-14-05 05:30 PM |
#132 |
 -
Thanks, just read thru your second link... |
southwood |
Jan-14-05 05:56 PM |
#134 |
 -
Hi |
Kellanved |
Jan-14-05 06:02 PM |
#135 |
 -
Freeman assumes... |
southwood |
Jan-14-05 06:25 PM |
#137 |
 -
he is correct |
Kellanved |
Jan-14-05 06:28 PM |
#138 |
 -
Yeah, baby-- you tell it. |
spooked911 |
Jan-12-05 09:30 PM |
#56 |
 -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jan-12-05 09:34 PM |
#57 |
  -
Yes-- they worked when you had paper ballots you could count |
spooked911 |
Jan-12-05 09:37 PM |
#58 |
 -
I think there is at least one... |
euler |
Jan-13-05 12:15 AM |
#77 |
  -
disagree |
nmoliver |
Jan-13-05 07:17 AM |
#86 |
 -
very clear, thanks! |
Rebecca |
Jan-13-05 07:44 AM |
#89 |
 -
Freakin AH right dude--and Becky your post rocked too |
FogerRox |
Jan-13-05 05:07 PM |
#97 |
-
Take a direct, simple approach: |
smartvoter |
Jan-12-05 10:51 PM |
#69 |
-
Ask him to debunk the documented fraud that explains the poll results |
berniew1 |
Jan-12-05 10:52 PM |
#70 |
 -
thank you....very helpful |
BamaBecky |
Jan-13-05 05:57 AM |
#80 |
-
I would simply ask him, then why did Bush support the Ukrainian revote |
johnaries |
Jan-12-05 11:21 PM |
#72 |
-
Then you can ask, why did the repubs make such a fuss |
rumpel |
Jan-12-05 11:23 PM |
#73 |
-
You should ask your Republican friend... |
anaxarchos |
Jan-13-05 12:34 AM |
#78 |
 -
I will.......thanks |
BamaBecky |
Jan-13-05 06:00 AM |
#81 |
 -
Excellent point, anaxarchos |
Der Blaue Engel |
Jan-13-05 04:00 PM |
#92 |
-
Make a reasonable argument, use logic, show examples. |
tngledwebb |
Jan-13-05 06:28 AM |
#85 |
-
Republican friend right on one point... |
flintdem |
Jan-13-05 04:32 PM |
#94 |
 -
Wrong |
RaulVB |
Jan-13-05 04:48 PM |
#96 |
  -
Only if the initial votes totals match the exit poll... |
flintdem |
Jan-13-05 05:31 PM |
#98 |
 -
You are mis-using this study... |
anaxarchos |
Jan-13-05 06:13 PM |
#100 |
  -
I'm not misusing it... |
flintdem |
Jan-13-05 08:07 PM |
#104 |
 -
OK, on the off chance that you are sincere... |
anaxarchos |
Jan-13-05 10:58 PM |
#108 |
 -
Let me be clearer |
flintdem |
Jan-14-05 08:45 AM |
#114 |
 -
Let me get this straight |
Chi |
Jan-14-05 09:39 AM |
#116 |
 -
Clarity is always good. |
anaxarchos |
Jan-14-05 02:20 PM |
#123 |
 -
A couple points... |
flintdem |
Jan-15-05 01:10 PM |
#147 |
 -
This is a reasonable outcome to our disagreement... |
anaxarchos |
Jan-15-05 02:02 PM |
#149 |
 -
Ditto |
flintdem |
Jan-15-05 02:14 PM |
#150 |
 -
the SSRC study... |
southwood |
Jan-13-05 06:17 PM |
#102 |
 -
Uh, your quote doesn't support your contention |
electropop |
Jan-14-05 09:46 AM |
#117 |
-
How does he know that the sampling wasn't accurate? |
info being |
Jan-13-05 05:41 PM |
#99 |
-
Your friend is no different than the naysays we find here. |
TruthIsAll |
Jan-13-05 06:13 PM |
#101 |
 -
You have such a good head on your shoulders! Thank You! eom |
BamaBecky |
Jan-13-05 08:34 PM |
#105 |
-
This focus on the "stolen" election is not healthy! |
I_Love_Oregon |
Jan-13-05 10:21 PM |
#107 |
 -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jan-14-05 06:18 AM |
#112 |
 -
Yeah. We might win the rigged game next time. My money's up... |
Junkdrawer |
Jan-14-05 06:18 AM |
#113 |
 -
That stuff you're seeing is sand. |
Pacifist Patriot |
Jan-14-05 09:05 AM |
#115 |
 -
Did your vote get counted? |
Chi |
Jan-14-05 09:49 AM |
#119 |
 -
Noone knows for sure whether the election was stolen. |
johan helge |
Jan-14-05 09:52 AM |
#120 |
 -
The evidence IS very strong for a stolen election |
Time for change |
Jan-14-05 04:28 PM |
#126 |
-
a paper trail is needed, but... |
I_Love_Oregon |
Jan-14-05 10:05 PM |
#140 |
-
Kerry did NOT lose the popular vote |
Time for change |
Jan-15-05 09:50 AM |
#141 |
-
It's a stretch.. |
I_Love_Oregon |
Jan-15-05 11:03 AM |
#143 |
-
No Offense, but... |
Chi |
Jan-15-05 12:37 PM |
#145 |
-
a scoop worth scooping |
I_Love_Oregon |
Jan-15-05 12:59 PM |
#146 |
-
Wow |
Chi |
Jan-15-05 01:55 PM |
#148 |
-
I've done my research |
I_Love_Oregon |
Jan-15-05 05:53 PM |
#152 |
-
Have you read Conyers' report? |
Time for change |
Jan-15-05 07:15 PM |
#154 |
-
SNAP OUT OF IT! |
I_Love_Oregon |
Jan-16-05 12:06 AM |
#155 |
-
WE'RE NOT STEWING ABOUT IT |
Time for change |
Jan-16-05 08:03 AM |
#156 |
-
I think I responded to this the other day |
electropop |
Jan-14-05 09:47 AM |
#118 |
-
All of his reasons are pure crap |
Time for change |
Jan-14-05 04:24 PM |
#125 |
-
Your "friend" |
troubleinwinter |
Jan-14-05 04:39 PM |
#128 |
 -
Exit Polls |
LA lady |
Jan-15-05 11:20 AM |
#144 |
-
I say they're lying about being told to lie |
Time for change |
Jan-16-05 10:33 AM |
#159 |
-
Tell them that Nostradamus has told us |
ottozen |
Jan-14-05 07:51 PM |
#139 |
-
Statistics have no precedent... |
super simian |
Jan-15-05 06:02 PM |
#153 |
-
Some points for your friend... |
Prag |
Jan-16-05 08:51 AM |
#157 |