You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #44: Why do you think that Frist is so hesitant to impliment the so called [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
righteous1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-05 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. Why do you think that Frist is so hesitant to impliment the so called
Edited on Sat Jan-08-05 07:29 PM by righteous1
"nuclear" option concerning judicial nominees? It's because once he does it's precedent. If we get contol of the Senate then we can do the same and he is not prepared to make the change allowing that to happen. It works for them now but it sure could work against them in the future. It's the same principal here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC