Reply #127: What you outlined above could NOT be proven in a 2-hr debate.

[RevCheesehead]

I agree. I believe there is evidence of fraud, but it is, right now, circumstantial at best.

Did you really think that impassioned pleas by Democrats would have led the Republicans to scratch their heads and say, "golly - maybe we need to take a look at this. Let's stop and recount all the votes, fix the machines, and declare this election invalid." Of course not.

If all the Senate and House members voted their objection, the 2-hour debate and vote would have been THE END. The house members showed in their speeches that they are going to be blatantly partisan, no matter what was said.

No matter what was said, NOTHING was going to change the unofficial results of the election. And no moderate Republicans would have joined in - there is too much "reasonable doubt" - and it would have been their own political suicide.

Really big problems are never solved quickly. The mistake of HAVA was in believing that "we got it right." To expose the corruption that exists within the system will take time. But the Dems have already signalled that they are moving on shrub (note their letter to Bush yesterday).

This ain't over, by a long shot!!!