You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #116: IF it had continued to procede in 2000 - then yes this argument is valid [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform

Machiavelli05

(335 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Jan-06-05 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #85

116. IF it had continued to procede in 2000 - then yes this argument is valid

However, the case here is totally different.

One was about allowing a recount to continue - and what votes would be counted.

This is about long lines, fraud, voting machines, board of election rules, biases, etc etc etc.

Same argument cant be applied.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.