You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #24: Some counties 3% recount didn't match the official count, yet [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
bufftiger Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. Some counties 3% recount didn't match the official count, yet
many counties refused to do the 100% precinct HAND recount that was
required by law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Ohio Recount Over 88/88 , JK picks up 300 Votes "Officially" righteous1  Dec-28-04 02:06 PM   #0 
  - please tell me this means little to us?  roenyc   Dec-28-04 02:07 PM   #1 
  - I think we have pretty much disqaulified the recount.  Goldeneye   Dec-28-04 02:09 PM   #2 
  - Well $115000 down the drain, some of that mine  righteous1   Dec-28-04 02:11 PM   #4 
     - It was a good starting point  Goldeneye   Dec-28-04 02:17 PM   # 
     - Not a total waste  Firespirit   Dec-28-04 02:26 PM   #14 
     - People, People! The recount has done its job!  Yellow Horse   Dec-28-04 03:36 PM   #21 
     - Not at all  DoYouEverWonder   Dec-28-04 03:40 PM   #22 
     - In the scheme of things, that was money WELL SPENT!  lonestarnot   Dec-28-04 04:54 PM   #36 
  - Court decisions are the next big event  righteous1   Dec-28-04 02:10 PM   #3 
  - It's OK, Mr Blackwell  Chimpanzee   Dec-28-04 02:12 PM   #5 
  - I bet he becomes Governor in '06. n/t  bones_7672   Dec-28-04 04:06 PM   #28 
     - That would be a definite, given the current voting mechanism! n/t  Ojai Person   Dec-28-04 04:25 PM   #32 
  - Not a word about the recount "irregularities". Incredible. n/t  ivorysteve   Dec-28-04 02:13 PM   #6 
  - at the end  Snivi Yllom   Dec-28-04 02:17 PM   #9 
  - says right in article.. this aint over...  Griffy   Dec-28-04 02:15 PM   #7 
  - near 300 votes in 3%...  mordarlar   Dec-28-04 02:16 PM   #8 
  - Exactly Mordarlar!  Quakerfriend   Dec-28-04 02:21 PM   #11 
  - Lets not give up the war before the battle has even started  mordarlar   Dec-28-04 02:31 PM   #15 
  - If you prorated that 300 votes @3% would amount to  righteous1   Dec-28-04 02:22 PM   #12 
  - Don't the rules say....  pabsungenis   Dec-28-04 02:21 PM   #10 
  - no  Snivi Yllom   Dec-28-04 02:24 PM   #13 
  - Was there even one OH county that recounted according to the law?  Fly by night   Dec-28-04 02:40 PM   #16 
  - Please write to AP reporter and ask about his incomplete reporting..  bufftiger   Dec-28-04 02:42 PM   #17 
  - all the ballots were recounted by machine  nicho   Dec-28-04 03:14 PM   #18 
     - Which means absolutely NOTHING, if there was machine fraud. eom  demodonkey   Dec-28-04 03:23 PM   #19 
     - if that is the case, then why do the recount at all?  nicho   Dec-28-04 03:32 PM   #20 
        - Why recount? For 1 thing, to start documenting some of these problems!  demodonkey   Dec-28-04 03:42 PM   #23 
           - it seems then that the recount validated the efficiency of the machines.  nicho   Dec-28-04 03:59 PM   #26 
              - No, some machine counts of the 3% did not match the official count  bufftiger   Dec-28-04 04:03 PM   #27 
              - I believe the 3% handcount is compared with the 3% machine REcount  nicho   Dec-28-04 04:09 PM   #29 
              - Fellow Buckeye here. You don't find election fraud "credible"?  Doremus   Dec-28-04 04:18 PM   #30 
              - I don't really think they did that to skew the results  righteous1   Dec-28-04 04:21 PM   #31 
              - your right, I'm new and haven't followed the fraud  nicho   Dec-28-04 04:26 PM   #33 
              - There are all kinds of problems with the OH machines....  Yellow Horse   Dec-28-04 05:16 PM   #38 
     - Some counties 3% recount didn't match the official count, yet  bufftiger   Dec-28-04 03:45 PM   #24 
     - All they proved  DoYouEverWonder   Dec-28-04 03:48 PM   #25 
  - Check the Green's recount site -- it's not official yet  Blissfulbride   Dec-28-04 04:28 PM   #34 
  - AP has UNofficial count totals  Blissfulbride   Dec-28-04 04:46 PM   #35 
     - "official" = (sarc)  righteous1   Dec-28-04 05:15 PM   #37 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC