You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #17: You would only need half. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-04 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
17. You would only need half.
If you took half (say 1.7 million) and gave them to Kerry, we'd be tied. It had to be definitive -- so whatever Kerry was supposed to have been ahead, just add that many to *. If it was going to be as close as everybody thought -- like the polls said -- you wouldn't have to do that much fudging because no one EVER would have believed that * won by 10 million votes. 3 million, yes. He didn't, but you get what I'm saying.

Also, there's NO FRIGGIN' MANDATE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC