You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #1: The answers are in the machines [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
catgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. The answers are in the machines
I'm afraid the major rigging was probably in the machines. Recounting will change nothing. We need to examine the machines!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -OH Recount news: Wood County tally done, unchanged EMunster  Dec-14-04 06:52 AM   #0 
  - The answers are in the machines  catgirl   Dec-14-04 07:05 AM   #1 
  - i agree n/t  seabeyond   Dec-14-04 07:08 AM   #3 
  - I think these were punch card ballots though.  jdog   Dec-14-04 07:08 AM   #4 
  - We ought to have a chance with the paper ballots  eowyn_of_rohan   Dec-14-04 07:09 AM   #5 
  - The cheater software is prolly replaced by honest version already  googly   Dec-14-04 11:19 AM   #17 
  - No, the honest software will produce new results in some areas  electropop   Dec-14-04 11:46 AM   #19 
     - Not unless ALL of the exact same voters who cast votes on that machine  googly   Dec-14-04 05:34 PM   #39 
  - Couldn't be  Nederland   Dec-14-04 12:14 PM   #24 
  - exactly....  Guarionex   Dec-14-04 12:15 PM   #26 
  - I agree, it is deeper than just this and if these were hand ballots...  NVMojo   Dec-14-04 01:07 PM   #35 
  - This has bothered me ... precincts chosen "at random"  WritersBlock   Dec-14-04 07:07 AM   #2 
  - I agree  jdog   Dec-14-04 07:09 AM   #6 
  - sheeit, they could even have precincts set up  seabeyond   Dec-14-04 07:09 AM   #7 
  - My understanding is that the Dem BOE personel have equal input  righteous1   Dec-14-04 07:22 AM   #12 
  - or BOE Dems just incompetent  pgh_dem   Dec-14-04 11:57 AM   #22 
  - Recount is a bi-partisan effort at the county level. Fraud would  bones_7672   Dec-14-04 11:51 AM   #20 
  - Never mind that they've had a month and a half  Hobbes199   Dec-14-04 12:04 PM   #23 
  - Punch Card - Triad. This county seemed okay to begin with. Numbers:  lostnfound   Dec-14-04 07:12 AM   #8 
  - Nader got 1500 in 2000  fliesincircles   Dec-14-04 07:39 AM   #13 
  - There were 757 ballots . . .  AndrewClarke   Dec-14-04 07:41 AM   #14 
  - How about a rigged recount?  Cobalt Violet   Dec-14-04 07:12 AM   #9 
  - Recount?  Last Lemming   Dec-14-04 07:13 AM   #10 
  - Wrong--these are punchcards in this county.  lostnfound   Dec-14-04 07:17 AM   #11 
     - Today it really feels like too little too late  Last Lemming   Dec-14-04 11:09 AM   #15 
  - No surprise with Wood Co., ever. Always pretty  skip fox   Dec-14-04 11:12 AM   #16 
  - Wood county not included on lawsuit  pgh_dem   Dec-14-04 11:44 AM   #18 
  - I noticed that too.  Flint-oid   Dec-14-04 01:48 PM   #38 
  - Exactly ....  sunnystarr   Dec-14-04 01:01 PM   #31 
  - They picked the counties they know have no problems  merh   Dec-14-04 11:55 AM   #21 
  - Not off by even ONE vote?  Terre   Dec-14-04 12:14 PM   #25 
  - I Have Same Question. Not Off By Even ONE Vote? That's Seems Highly  cryingshame   Dec-14-04 01:46 PM   #37 
  - Kerry's letter yesterday spoke to the random selection of  texpatriot2004   Dec-14-04 12:29 PM   #27 
  - Yeah, but the Election Official noted he doesn't have to follow what  sunnystarr   Dec-14-04 01:02 PM   #32 
  - Gee, I wonder if the election officials posted the recount tallies  texpatriot2004   Dec-14-04 12:31 PM   #28 
  - I was wondering the same thing ... that guy from Triad probably  sunnystarr   Dec-14-04 01:04 PM   #33 
     - Triad guy probably delivered the recount tallys n/t  sfexpat2000   Dec-14-04 05:37 PM   #41 
  - Hopefully, the exception proves the rule......nt  Shalom   Dec-14-04 12:47 PM   #29 
  - Isn't the fact that they matched exactly cause for concern?  Hobbes199   Dec-14-04 12:49 PM   #30 
  - Yes. Hand recounts almost never match machine counts. n/t  pointsoflight   Dec-14-04 05:35 PM   #40 
     - In the WA recount quite a few counties match exactly  mostly_lurking   Dec-14-04 06:18 PM   #42 
  - It's a good sign  november3rd   Dec-14-04 01:05 PM   #34 
  - Tiny County  liberal43110   Dec-14-04 01:27 PM   #36 
  - Look at Washington State. Most precincts had a shift of some sort.  merwin   Dec-14-04 06:24 PM   #43 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC