Reply #355: That deserves a response

[Jack Rabbit]

Your concerns are valid and need to be addressed. I'm not saying you're wrong. After all, these are things that would be brought up in defense of those named by Mr. Curtis in his affidavit.

There are two kinds of people who would ask Yang Enterprise personnel about how vote rigging could be done: (1) election officials; and (2) candidates or political party officials who don't trust election officials. So far, there's nothing suspicious.

Where an alert should have been raised in this project is when it became an actual project rather than a hypothetical discussion on what could go wrong with election software, either accidentally or intentionally. A private company is out to make a profit and has better things to do than to write computer software that merely proves a point rather than is intended for actual use. It is at that point that Mr. Curtis or anybody else should have had reason to suspect that his employer and Mr. Feeney were engaged in a criminal conspiracy to commit election fraud.