You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #23: Can we recall Reps who vote to certify this election? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
Liberty Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
23. Can we recall Reps who vote to certify this election?
But can't Congressional Representatives and Senators be recalled by voters? We need our elected officials to stand up in Congress and refuse to certify this election--and we should let them know that if they vote to annoint a thief who stole the election, we'll be circulating petitions to get recall initiatives on the ballots.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Transcript of Wayne Madsen interview 12/05 on Sunday Monitor eomer  Dec-05-04 10:56 PM   #0 
  - Thanks for post!..n/t  Vote4Kerry   Dec-05-04 11:03 PM   #1 
  - Wow. Now he's implicating a House Speaker, Jeb, and the CIA director...  Liberty Belle   Dec-05-04 11:07 PM   #2 
  - KPFT  eomer   Dec-05-04 11:09 PM   #3 
  - Makes sense about the CIA director  rockedthevoteinMA   Dec-05-04 11:16 PM   #5 
  - Goss was in Army intelligence and then a CIA officer for years n/t  Garbo 2004   Dec-05-04 11:24 PM   #9 
     - oh sorry i saw a video of him saying he had absolutely  rockedthevoteinMA   Dec-05-04 11:27 PM   #11 
        - No, what he said was that  Eloriel   Dec-05-04 11:30 PM   #13 
        - Link? n/t  jamboi   Dec-06-04 12:53 AM   #44 
           - Here ya go Jamboi!  rockedthevoteinMA   Dec-06-04 08:42 AM   #70 
  - Its a KPFT program. I'm not sure if its syndicated on Pacifica or not. n/t  jamboi   Dec-06-04 12:31 AM   #35 
  - Holy guacamole, Batman?  crispini   Dec-05-04 11:11 PM   #4 
  - jamboi told us the check was a fake few days ago  rdmccur   Dec-05-04 11:17 PM   #7 
  - The check was an elaborate decoy designed to mislead investigators away  jamboi   Dec-06-04 12:33 AM   #36 
  - Nothing to see here. Move along.  pointsoflight   Dec-05-04 11:16 PM   #6 
  - Here is a trace of something  Evening Star   Dec-05-04 11:19 PM   #8 
  - Wow, E.S.  Eloriel   Dec-05-04 11:32 PM   #14 
  - Looks likely to be related. If not related, then its at least more dirt on  jamboi   Dec-06-04 12:48 AM   #42 
  - Madsen should maybe try to talk with Ms. Georgalis?  rdmccur   Dec-05-04 11:33 PM   #15 
  - I forwarded it on to him. n/t  jamboi   Dec-06-04 12:55 AM   #45 
  - O'Keefe-Feeney-Yang Enterprises and the FEC  Carolab   Dec-05-04 11:47 PM   #17 
  - Bingo! Forwarded it on. n/t  jamboi   Dec-06-04 01:03 AM   #47 
  - Think you've hit some paydirt there. n/t  jamboi   Dec-06-04 12:35 AM   #37 
     - If Yang is fed contractor, can they sponsor BC04 event?  satya   Dec-06-04 04:45 AM   #60 
        - Thanks! n/t  jamboi   Dec-06-04 05:01 AM   #65 
  - I notice that Cliff Arnebeck and James Galbraith were on. Did they give  KoKo01   Dec-05-04 11:24 PM   #10 
  - Yes, Arnebeck brought us up to date. Not much new, except he explained  jamboi   Dec-06-04 01:11 AM   #48 
  - Yea But.........  Twist_U_Up   Dec-05-04 11:30 PM   # 
  - The world and its people  rdmccur   Dec-05-04 11:40 PM   #16 
  - Can we recall Reps who vote to certify this election?  Liberty Belle   Dec-06-04 12:07 AM   #23 
  - The Shrub won't be arrested. But it would be nice if he were dethroned.  ClintCooper2003   Dec-06-04 12:26 AM   #30 
  - Well if we stick to the constitution there are many points of intervention  jamboi   Dec-06-04 02:31 AM   #54 
  - Wong or Yang?  Evening Star   Dec-05-04 11:30 PM   #12 
  - This was discussed at some length  rdmccur   Dec-05-04 11:49 PM   #18 
  - Its Yang. Wong was a pseudonym. n/t  jamboi   Dec-06-04 02:30 AM   #53 
  - This looks like a hoax to me (eom)  Evening Star   Dec-05-04 11:53 PM   #19 
  - Yang Enterprises is no hoax. Wong was an alias to protect the whistleblow  jamboi   Dec-06-04 02:32 AM   #55 
  - I think it is a hoax, no Wong Enterprises googles eom  Evening Star   Dec-05-04 11:57 PM   #20 
     - Feeney was a lobbyist for YANG ENTERPRISES (NOT WONG)  Carolab   Dec-05-04 11:59 PM   #21 
        - this says it all  Twist_U_Up   Dec-06-04 12:07 AM   #24 
        - Yang Enterprises  Twist_U_Up   Dec-06-04 12:17 AM   #26 
        - this looks like a company willing to cover things up  Twist_U_Up   Dec-06-04 12:23 AM   #27 
        - Yes, check Yang, not Wong. n/t  jamboi   Dec-06-04 02:33 AM   #56 
  - OMG! Read this excerpt:  TexasChick   Dec-06-04 12:02 AM   #22 
  - Another interesting link  dotcosm   Dec-06-04 12:15 AM   #25 
  - From the suit filed  dotcosm   Dec-06-04 12:23 AM   #28 
  - Can anyone check on Yang's death?  Carolab   Dec-06-04 12:27 AM   #31 
  - He didn't say who died  dotcosm   Dec-06-04 12:35 AM   #38 
     - Right, I got confused from the way it was worded (and how I heard it)  Carolab   Dec-06-04 12:42 AM   #40 
        - Here are a group of articles from Florida's press on this issue  Carolab   Dec-06-04 01:21 AM   #51 
  - I wondered about this story, thanks for posting this...  Pepper32   Dec-06-04 08:12 AM   #68 
  - It's odd that he refers to his employers as 'Wong' and not 'Yang'  txindy   Dec-06-04 12:30 AM   #33 
  - Exactly. That's why I don't trust it.  Carolab   Dec-06-04 12:44 AM   #41 
  - Maybe he was being coy?  dotcosm   Dec-06-04 12:56 AM   #46 
     - Maybe  txindy   Dec-06-04 01:13 AM   #49 
  - More on CC  dotcosm   Dec-06-04 12:51 AM   #43 
  - HOLY F*****G S**T! HOLY F*****G S**T!  ClintCooper2003   Dec-06-04 12:25 AM   #29 
  - Thanks for doing the transcript! I know how hard work that is, having just  jamboi   Dec-06-04 12:29 AM   #32 
  - It's exciting but I have one BIG concern  Carolab   Dec-06-04 12:30 AM   #34 
     - Yes, as explained, Wong was an alias since until he had full backing/help  jamboi   Dec-06-04 05:00 AM   #63 
  - thanks for your work getting this to us!  eleny   Dec-06-04 12:37 AM   #39 
  - I like what I read, but...  RaulVB   Dec-06-04 01:15 AM   #50 
  - Have no fear. He is. n/t  jamboi   Dec-06-04 05:00 AM   #64 
  - I hope Madsen is not basing his reporting on this "Clint Curtis"...  EMunster   Dec-06-04 01:50 AM   #52 
  - well, the online reviews don't look so bad ...  NVMojo   Dec-06-04 02:37 AM   #57 
  - I know they're favorable...but it's their tone...they sound like they...  EMunster   Dec-06-04 03:00 AM   #58 
  - Read Madsen's 4th article. Looks to me Curtis stands up quite well.  jamboi   Dec-06-04 04:58 AM   #62 
  - Frankly, I think Fisher's story is a lot more credible  Carolab   Dec-06-04 03:27 AM   #59 
  - Did you read his new article? Its hard to compare Fisher's sketchy outlin  jamboi   Dec-06-04 04:56 AM   #61 
  - kick  eomer   Dec-06-04 06:58 AM   #66 
  - Is there an audio of this interview  forintegrity   Dec-06-04 07:56 AM   #67 
     - Yes, here's the link  eomer   Dec-06-04 08:32 AM   #69 
        - Thanks!  forintegrity   Dec-06-04 09:08 AM   #71 
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC