Reply #174: This isn't my argument...

[labouchet]

I don't want to argue semantics, or your facility in the english language. If this is just a misunderstanding, so be it.

The "forceful" you are advocating here is out of place for a messageboard. That was and is my point.

When you go over the line in social discourse, you arouse suspicions. Right or wrong. Sorry about that, but there it is.

I'd still like you to answer why it wouldn't have been more productive to simply debunk the so-called false claims made by these so-called fraudsters.

Anything beyond that ventures into the "passive-aggressive", "plea to emotion", territory.

Again, I'm sorry if you can't see that.