You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #172: obfuscation? the debunking started long ago and done many times [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform

luaptifer

(215 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sun Dec-05-04 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #171

172. obfuscation? the debunking started long ago and done many times

now the issue is apparently my argument with you that it was necessary to be forceful, or not. thus, my attempt to get you to see there were good reasons for being forceful and detailed in laying out the debunk. guess i didn't succeed, huh?

disputing the need to be forceful and detailed seemed to be the implication of your use of 'overzealous' but i find that being wrong is something i can't always avoid. english is not perfect nor is my use of it.

am i wrong?

well, whether or not, i'll find out tomorrow.

oh yes, please do explain the obfuscation thing, gracias, cya tomorrow.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.