You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #12: I found the threads discussing this... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
Chili Donating Member (832 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-04 03:23 AM
Response to Original message
12. I found the threads discussing this...
Edited on Sat Dec-04-04 03:52 AM by Chili

Here's an additional one for reference:

There might be more... still looking.

Yes, I'm adding this one (at 4:52am), if you come back to this post:

(PS: that first link is also just for reference - sorry, I thought there was more in it than that. But I'm glad I read that, I've been looking high and low for this statement, because I knew I'd read it somewhere: "Six counties use an older form of electronic voting, which has a means of verifying the accuracy of the vote." So the machines in Franklin and Mahoning county CAN BE AUDITED and the votes somehow verified. Yeah!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Anyone have the original Cuyahoga results? Something's fishy. garybeck  Dec-04-04 02:32 AM   #0 
  - Everything  latteromden   Dec-04-04 02:39 AM   #1 
  - Here's something for now, and I'm still searching...  ClintCooper2003   Dec-04-04 02:46 AM   #2 
  - I just added up those totals...  Chili   Dec-04-04 03:04 AM   #6 
  - but  garybeck   Dec-04-04 03:15 AM   #8 
     - well, heck, I agree with you, LOL!  Chili   Dec-04-04 03:25 AM   #14 
  - Let's Put That in the Proper Context  AndyTiedye   Dec-04-04 03:37 AM   #17 
  - this is all I have  mulethree   Dec-04-04 02:50 AM   #3 
  - no not undervotes, just more votes than registered voters  garybeck   Dec-04-04 02:51 AM   #4 
  - Check with Joe Knapp. I think he has all the data - extensive research  Lil   Dec-04-04 02:55 AM   #5 
  - too recent, doesn't show the over votes  garybeck   Dec-04-04 03:08 AM   #7 
     - whoa... okay, I see what you're saying...  Chili   Dec-04-04 03:27 AM   #15 
     - I see his profile has ok for pm and email. I know he has been working. . .  Lil   Dec-04-04 03:46 AM   #21 
  - Here  jfern   Dec-04-04 03:16 AM   #9 
  - Awesome catch! Hat off to you! :-)  Lil   Dec-04-04 03:22 AM   #11 
  - What's wrong with 4F & 4N  garybeck   Dec-04-04 03:24 AM   #13 
     - check out this thread re 4F and 4N  Lil   Dec-04-04 03:28 AM   #16 
        - It's not just 3rd party votes  jfern   Dec-04-04 04:59 AM   #25 
  - fishy  garybeck   Dec-04-04 03:20 AM   #10 
  - Put This On the Other Side  AndyTiedye   Dec-04-04 03:41 AM   #19 
  - I found the threads discussing this...  Chili   Dec-04-04 03:23 AM   #12 
  - except for one thing  garybeck   Dec-04-04 03:37 AM   #18 
     - hey... I LIVE in Cuyahoga County... you're preaching to the choir...  Chili   Dec-04-04 03:46 AM   #20 
  - A spreadsheet with 'final' cuyahoga data  mulethree   Dec-04-04 03:57 AM   #22 
  - this is what i had in my files..maybe it can help!  flyarm   Dec-04-04 04:07 AM   #23 
     - i have this also from approx nov 10th  flyarm   Dec-04-04 04:16 AM   #24 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC