maddogesq
(915 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-30-06 09:13 PM
Response to Original message |
| 34. Yes?, no, no, yes, yes. |
|
I am still up in the air on 1. If someone who has the scoop on one can elighten me, please PM. 2 and 3 are no-brainers. 4 and 5 seem all right by me.
|
| -How are you voting on the non-partisan part of your ballot? Proposals? |
skipos |
Oct-25-06 10:25 PM |
#0 |
 -
Cavanagh and Beckering for Supreme Court - and HELL NO on 2! |
ih8thegop |
Oct-25-06 11:51 PM |
#1 |
  -
Me, too. |
SharonRB |
Oct-26-06 07:53 AM |
#2 |
| -
No. No. No. Yes. Yes. |
TahitiNut |
Oct-26-06 09:37 AM |
#3 |
| -
Vote NO on All Proposals |
Hidden Stillness |
Oct-26-06 11:47 AM |
#4 |
| -
Thanks for the detailed reponse. nt |
skipos |
Oct-26-06 01:30 PM |
#7 |
| -
Proposal # 3 is counter intuitive |
russ1943 |
Oct-29-06 12:00 PM |
#24 |
| -
Thanks! |
SharonRB |
Oct-29-06 06:13 PM |
#28 |
| -
yea that was great |
herbbrown |
Oct-29-06 12:10 PM |
#25 |
| -
Leaning Yes, No, No, No, No |
Strawman |
Oct-26-06 12:30 PM |
#5 |
| -
Why you should vote yes on 4 |
SharonRB |
Oct-26-06 01:11 PM |
#6 |
| -
I will read more about it |
Strawman |
Oct-26-06 01:30 PM |
#8 |
| -
Read the CRC report, now I'm definitely voting no |
Strawman |
Oct-26-06 02:05 PM |
#10 |
| -
The legislative sponsor of Prop 4 is Tony Stamas (R) of Midland |
skipos |
Oct-26-06 02:39 PM |
#11 |
| -
It's libertarian, property rights absolutism, that's why |
Strawman |
Oct-26-06 02:49 PM |
#12 |
| -
Thanks |
skipos |
Oct-26-06 01:30 PM |
#9 |
| -
The Republicans are against 5 |
bif |
Oct-26-06 03:53 PM |
#13 |
| -
So is Granholm |
Strawman |
Oct-26-06 04:05 PM |
#14 |
| -
We shouldn't vote against things that are correct just because |
joeygirl |
Oct-26-06 05:39 PM |
#15 |
| -
Changing to NO on ALL |
Strawman |
Oct-30-06 11:46 AM |
#32 |
| -
Michigan Municipal League on Eminent Domain/Prop 4 |
Hidden Stillness |
Oct-28-06 12:36 PM |
#16 |
| -
Thanks for this. |
SharonRB |
Oct-28-06 01:59 PM |
#17 |
| -
I agree. Some proposals sounded good, but I am leaning "no" on all of them now. |
skipos |
Oct-28-06 03:07 PM |
#18 |
| -
yes, no, no, no, yes |
bain_sidhe |
Oct-28-06 06:50 PM |
#19 |
| -
No, no ,no, yes,yes |
etherealtruth |
Oct-28-06 08:02 PM |
#20 |
| -
Yes, No, No, Yes, Yes |
MichDem10 |
Oct-28-06 10:36 PM |
#21 |
| -
Voting no on everything |
bif |
Oct-29-06 11:17 AM |
#22 |
| -
Beware of Propaganda |
Hidden Stillness |
Oct-29-06 11:49 AM |
#23 |
| -
Yes, lets beware of propaganda |
bain_sidhe |
Oct-29-06 02:14 PM |
#26 |
| -
Prop 5 Does Not Fund School Operations; It is a Retirement Fund |
Hidden Stillness |
Oct-29-06 03:39 PM |
#27 |
| -
That is simply not true |
bain_sidhe |
Oct-29-06 06:33 PM |
#29 |
| -
Again, No Reference to the Studies of the Proposal |
Hidden Stillness |
Oct-29-06 09:55 PM |
#30 |
| -
I've read the proposal |
bain_sidhe |
Oct-30-06 06:56 PM |
#33 |
| -
No on all of them |
noonwitch |
Oct-30-06 08:40 AM |
#31 |
| -
Yes?, no, no, yes, yes. |
maddogesq |
Oct-30-06 09:13 PM |
#34 |
| -
How I'm voting and a little bit of why |
dewie |
Nov-02-06 11:43 AM |
#35 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread