joeygirl
(34 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-26-06 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
| 15. We shouldn't vote against things that are correct just because |
|
the Repukes say that it's bad policy as well. I'm voting No because I don't buy into the notion that more money will actually make it into the classroom. And it's fiscally irresponsible. If our economy continues to tank, and we have to pay these mandatory increases every year, where is this money going to come from? The budget cuts that will be needed to cover the mandated increase will make Engler's look small by comparison. Is that really a road that we want to go down?
|
| -How are you voting on the non-partisan part of your ballot? Proposals? |
skipos |
Oct-25-06 10:25 PM |
#0 |
 -
Cavanagh and Beckering for Supreme Court - and HELL NO on 2! |
ih8thegop |
Oct-25-06 11:51 PM |
#1 |
  -
Me, too. |
SharonRB |
Oct-26-06 07:53 AM |
#2 |
| -
No. No. No. Yes. Yes. |
TahitiNut |
Oct-26-06 09:37 AM |
#3 |
| -
Vote NO on All Proposals |
Hidden Stillness |
Oct-26-06 11:47 AM |
#4 |
| -
Thanks for the detailed reponse. nt |
skipos |
Oct-26-06 01:30 PM |
#7 |
| -
Proposal # 3 is counter intuitive |
russ1943 |
Oct-29-06 12:00 PM |
#24 |
| -
Thanks! |
SharonRB |
Oct-29-06 06:13 PM |
#28 |
| -
yea that was great |
herbbrown |
Oct-29-06 12:10 PM |
#25 |
| -
Leaning Yes, No, No, No, No |
Strawman |
Oct-26-06 12:30 PM |
#5 |
| -
Why you should vote yes on 4 |
SharonRB |
Oct-26-06 01:11 PM |
#6 |
| -
I will read more about it |
Strawman |
Oct-26-06 01:30 PM |
#8 |
| -
Read the CRC report, now I'm definitely voting no |
Strawman |
Oct-26-06 02:05 PM |
#10 |
| -
The legislative sponsor of Prop 4 is Tony Stamas (R) of Midland |
skipos |
Oct-26-06 02:39 PM |
#11 |
| -
It's libertarian, property rights absolutism, that's why |
Strawman |
Oct-26-06 02:49 PM |
#12 |
| -
Thanks |
skipos |
Oct-26-06 01:30 PM |
#9 |
| -
The Republicans are against 5 |
bif |
Oct-26-06 03:53 PM |
#13 |
| -
So is Granholm |
Strawman |
Oct-26-06 04:05 PM |
#14 |
| -
We shouldn't vote against things that are correct just because |
joeygirl |
Oct-26-06 05:39 PM |
#15 |
| -
Changing to NO on ALL |
Strawman |
Oct-30-06 11:46 AM |
#32 |
| -
Michigan Municipal League on Eminent Domain/Prop 4 |
Hidden Stillness |
Oct-28-06 12:36 PM |
#16 |
| -
Thanks for this. |
SharonRB |
Oct-28-06 01:59 PM |
#17 |
| -
I agree. Some proposals sounded good, but I am leaning "no" on all of them now. |
skipos |
Oct-28-06 03:07 PM |
#18 |
| -
yes, no, no, no, yes |
bain_sidhe |
Oct-28-06 06:50 PM |
#19 |
| -
No, no ,no, yes,yes |
etherealtruth |
Oct-28-06 08:02 PM |
#20 |
| -
Yes, No, No, Yes, Yes |
MichDem10 |
Oct-28-06 10:36 PM |
#21 |
| -
Voting no on everything |
bif |
Oct-29-06 11:17 AM |
#22 |
| -
Beware of Propaganda |
Hidden Stillness |
Oct-29-06 11:49 AM |
#23 |
| -
Yes, lets beware of propaganda |
bain_sidhe |
Oct-29-06 02:14 PM |
#26 |
| -
Prop 5 Does Not Fund School Operations; It is a Retirement Fund |
Hidden Stillness |
Oct-29-06 03:39 PM |
#27 |
| -
That is simply not true |
bain_sidhe |
Oct-29-06 06:33 PM |
#29 |
| -
Again, No Reference to the Studies of the Proposal |
Hidden Stillness |
Oct-29-06 09:55 PM |
#30 |
| -
I've read the proposal |
bain_sidhe |
Oct-30-06 06:56 PM |
#33 |
| -
No on all of them |
noonwitch |
Oct-30-06 08:40 AM |
#31 |
| -
Yes?, no, no, yes, yes. |
maddogesq |
Oct-30-06 09:13 PM |
#34 |
| -
How I'm voting and a little bit of why |
dewie |
Nov-02-06 11:43 AM |
#35 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread