You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #22: The fact that she did buy the property [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » Arizona Donate to DU
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-10 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. The fact that she did buy the property
Edited on Fri Sep-10-10 02:18 PM by LaurenG
and in her mind thought it was all good is what I'm concerned about. Others in this thread have told you about the neighborhood. City Councils' uphold the law when they feel like it - we ALL know this, we all have anecdotal stories, think (past) mayor of Wasilla. So really they could give her a break and the animals that she is caring for could be saved.

Just for full disclosure - are you on the City Council somewhere?

edit: spelling

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
  -Queen Creek Arizona dog shelter ordered to close SargeUNN  Sep-10-10 11:49 AM   #0 
  - Over a stupid permit?  Lightning Count   Sep-10-10 11:54 AM   #1 
  - Would you feel that way if your house and back yard were next door to the "shelter"  yellowcanine   Sep-10-10 12:36 PM   #4 
     - Except ...  Kweli4Real   Sep-10-10 12:57 PM   #11 
     - According to the article it is zoned residential. There is a process for getting a permit  yellowcanine   Sep-10-10 01:54 PM   #17 
        - Sounds like the council needs to run a crackdown operation then.  Lightning Count   Sep-10-10 02:09 PM   #20 
     - If this was one of the city council's businesses, you can bet that permit would have been  Lightning Count   Sep-10-10 12:58 PM   #12 
  - Oh no that's devastating.  LaurenG   Sep-10-10 11:56 AM   #2 
  - Why should the City Council change their decision? She broke the law.  yellowcanine   Sep-10-10 12:40 PM   #5 
     - I don't know maybe you could think of a reason. I hope they do.  LaurenG   Sep-10-10 12:45 PM   #7 
     - No I can't. They should uphold their zoning laws. Read the neighbor's account:  yellowcanine   Sep-10-10 12:51 PM   #9 
        - I am really sorry for the neighbor  LaurenG   Sep-10-10 12:56 PM   #10 
           - No one with any sense buys property based on "what they told me"  yellowcanine   Sep-10-10 02:05 PM   #18 
              - So to shelter animals in a rural locale you need to pay a lawyer a few grand?  Lightning Count   Sep-10-10 02:07 PM   #19 
              - If they are in violation of zoning laws - absolutely. And it is a bit disingenuous to make this  yellowcanine   Sep-10-10 02:25 PM   #25 
              - The fact that she did buy the property  LaurenG   Sep-10-10 02:15 PM   #22 
                 - Don't be absurd. Just for full disclosure, do you run a dog boarding business?  yellowcanine   Sep-10-10 02:33 PM   #26 
                    - I wish the best for her and her animals  LaurenG   Sep-10-10 02:41 PM   #29 
     - I understand your point ...  Kweli4Real   Sep-10-10 01:03 PM   #13 
        - People have made claims - I can only go by what is in the article.  yellowcanine   Sep-10-10 02:39 PM   #27 
  - This is so sad, BUT  lillypaddle   Sep-10-10 12:34 PM   #3 
  - Exactly right. Dog shelters do not belong in residential neighborhoods.  yellowcanine   Sep-10-10 12:44 PM   #6 
  - This is a stupid statement.  LiberalFighter   Sep-10-10 12:46 PM   #8 
  - She also operates a dog training and boarding business out of the same building.  yellowcanine   Sep-10-10 01:03 PM   #14 
     - The training and boarding is what makes the rescue operation possible.  RaleighNCDUer   Sep-10-10 01:33 PM   #16 
     - "If she was led to believe....." That is her account. Some people choose to hear what they  yellowcanine   Sep-10-10 02:16 PM   #23 
        - You mean a wealthy business owner.  Lightning Count   Sep-10-10 02:39 PM   #28 
        - B.S. That is a total cop out. Lots of small businesses hire lawyers.  yellowcanine   Sep-10-10 02:52 PM   #32 
           - You would be wrong.  Lightning Count   Sep-10-10 02:58 PM   #33 
              - People hear what they want to hear. That is why they need to get competent legal advice.  yellowcanine   Sep-10-10 03:13 PM   #35 
        - You do get, don't you, that this is not a 'business'. It is a vocation.  RaleighNCDUer   Sep-10-10 02:44 PM   #30 
           - Yeah I got that part. And I don't believe it. She was running a dog training/boarding business.  yellowcanine   Sep-10-10 03:04 PM   #34 
     - I agree that she was wrong to build without a permit.  LiberalFighter   Sep-10-10 02:24 PM   #24 
        - Well I guess I am more cynical. I think this is mostly a dog training and boarding business.  yellowcanine   Sep-10-10 02:47 PM   #31 
  - Another act of lunacy by the loons in Arizona  classysassy   Sep-10-10 01:21 PM   #15 
  - Calling Ellen Degeneres!!!!!!!!!!! Bail this animals out.  glinda   Sep-10-10 02:10 PM   #21 
 

Home » Discuss » Places » Arizona Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC