You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #36: Looks like we're going to be needing more PIES! [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
thebigthink Donating Member (67 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
36. Looks like we're going to be needing more PIES!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Nader Says a Run would Benefit Democrats mot78  Jan-10-04 03:24 PM   #0 
  - Good God I hate that man...  KissMyAsscroft   Jan-10-04 03:28 PM   #1 
  - I pray to God that he doesn't run  mot78   Jan-10-04 03:34 PM   #3 
  - How in hell  HFishbine   Jan-10-04 03:38 PM   #6 
  - His self-absorption does seem complete.  aquart   Jan-10-04 03:36 PM   #4 
  - aren't you a Dean supporter?  Terwilliger   Jan-10-04 03:39 PM   #7 
  - nader needs a new hobby......n/t  bearfartinthewoods   Jan-11-04 02:19 AM   #51 
  - Well, I do agree with at least one thing he said in that article  pmbryant   Jan-10-04 03:34 PM   #2 
  - I actually agree with Nader on many issues  mot78   Jan-10-04 03:36 PM   #5 
  - The Story of 2002 Was Highway Robbery and Murder  AndyTiedye   Jan-10-04 05:19 PM   #35 
  - Why doesn't Nader travel around the country giving speeches without  Eric J in MN   Jan-10-04 03:39 PM   #8 
  - because he is a self-absorbed f***ing ASSHOLE  Skittles   Jan-10-04 04:09 PM   #21 
  - Well, that is just peachy-keen. As long as he has far more  Kerryfan   Jan-10-04 03:39 PM   #9 
  - Maybe in the 2032 campaign  Jim4Wes   Jan-10-04 03:39 PM   #10 
  - i agree with Ralph, and hope he runs(nt)  OhioStateProgressive   Jan-10-04 03:41 PM   #11 
  - When * gets reelected we shouldn't let Ralph move to Canada with us  mot78   Jan-10-04 03:44 PM   #15 
  - Here, here...  formernaderite   Jan-10-04 08:25 PM   #44 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-10-04 03:42 PM   #12 
  - Dean and Clark are each a thousand times better than George W.  Eric J in MN   Jan-10-04 10:23 PM   #48 
  - We don't need him to help us lose we have DEAN  MIMStigator   Jan-10-04 03:43 PM   #13 
  - I don't think Saint Ralph is going to get much support this time out.  grytpype   Jan-10-04 03:43 PM   #14 
  - He will because the media whores and Karl Rove said so  mot78   Jan-10-04 03:52 PM   #16 
     - really  Terwilliger   Jan-10-04 04:01 PM   #18 
        - honestly  Skittles   Jan-10-04 04:10 PM   #22 
        - Democrats supported Buchanan in 2000  Terwilliger   Jan-10-04 04:21 PM   #31 
        - Terwilliger I respect your opinion, but the Repugs want Nader to run  mot78   Jan-10-04 04:11 PM   #24 
           - I don't give a shit what cynical Repukes want  Terwilliger   Jan-10-04 04:20 PM   #29 
              - I believe Nader is trying to help us out.  ozone_man   Jan-10-04 05:56 PM   #40 
                 - ""acceptable" Democratic candidate."  ThirdWheelLegend   Jan-11-04 02:08 AM   #50 
  - It's a free country, let him run.  JVS   Jan-10-04 03:56 PM   #17 
  - Let Nader run, don't make a martyr out of him!  IndianaGreen   Jan-10-04 04:02 PM   #19 
  - He could still do that by reforming the Democratic party from the inside  mot78   Jan-10-04 04:02 PM   #20 
     - That is the right way  Jim4Wes   Jan-10-04 04:11 PM   #23 
     - Nader is not a team player  IndianaGreen   Jan-10-04 04:11 PM   #25 
     - Makes sense  mot78   Jan-10-04 04:14 PM   #26 
     - Unfortunately...  nancyharris   Jan-10-04 04:18 PM   #27 
     - I'm sorry but attempts to reform the party from inside tend to be...  JVS   Jan-10-04 04:23 PM   #32 
        - amen n/t  goodhue   Jan-10-04 09:58 PM   #47 
  - "Nader Says a Run would Benefit Democrats"  jburton   Jan-10-04 04:19 PM   #28 
  - Maybe on *his* planet, it would  bain_sidhe   Jan-10-04 04:21 PM   #30 
  - 100% pure rationalization.  TacticalPeak   Jan-10-04 04:25 PM   #33 
  - Yeah, how'd that work out for us in 2000?  2dumb2beprez   Jan-10-04 04:25 PM   #34 
  - Looks like we're going to be needing more PIES!  thebigthink   Jan-10-04 05:24 PM   #36 
  - Nader is a pustule on the ass of the world  Clark Can WIN   Jan-10-04 05:26 PM   #37 
  - No, a Nader run would benefit REPUBLICANS.  no_hypocrisy   Jan-10-04 05:47 PM   #38 
  - I agree with Nader!  forgethell   Jan-10-04 05:50 PM   #39 
  - Wow, what a great article!  flaminbats   Jan-10-04 06:19 PM   #41 
  - Nader is a bleeding idiot  pam k78   Jan-10-04 06:29 PM   #42 
  - I agree with him.  Marian   Jan-10-04 06:30 PM   #43 
  - I almost voted for Nader  mikewriter   Jan-10-04 09:52 PM   #46 
  - Ralph's right for the wrong reason  John_H   Jan-10-04 09:06 PM   #45 
  - I still say PIE is the answer.  thebigthink   Jan-10-04 10:50 PM   #49 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC