You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #9: Except for the part that I, as an employer have to pay [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
democratreformed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Except for the part that I, as an employer have to pay
Edited on Sat Jan-10-04 12:34 PM by democratreformed
On second thought, I guess that could be seen as a corporate income tax. Maybe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -I think Dean got himself in more trouble with this Tax issue. Bleachers7  Jan-10-04 12:22 PM   #0 
  - We don't know enough yet  Dookus   Jan-10-04 12:24 PM   #1 
  - Not Only Has He Had Two Years- He's Raked In Enough Money  cryingshame   Jan-10-04 12:30 PM   #8 
  - Not to mention that he didn't start hinting at this until...  jadesfire   Jan-10-04 06:30 PM   #37 
  - general revenues to make up for all the money lost under a payroll tax cut  w4rma   Jan-10-04 12:24 PM   #2 
  - Come again?  nancyharris   Jan-10-04 12:27 PM   #5 
  - That's right. (n/t)  w4rma   Jan-10-04 12:29 PM   #7 
     - correct - current excess payroll tax sent to rich via bush tax cuts  papau   Jan-10-04 04:56 PM   #34 
  - Any Dem who  asjr   Jan-10-04 12:46 PM   #11 
  - FICA is just another form of income tax.  stickdog   Jan-10-04 12:25 PM   #3 
  - There ya go...  deminflorida   Jan-10-04 12:27 PM   # 
  - I agree...  Dookus   Jan-10-04 12:27 PM   #4 
  - None are so blind as those who will not see (post #2) (n/t)  w4rma   Jan-10-04 12:28 PM   #6 
  - umm...  Dookus   Jan-10-04 01:00 PM   #15 
     - How will Clark pay for his tax cuts for married folks? (n/t)  w4rma   Jan-10-04 02:11 PM   #22 
        - corporate taxes ...  Pepperbelly   Jan-10-04 02:14 PM   #24 
           - So he raises taxes on some buisnesses? (n/t)  w4rma   Jan-10-04 02:19 PM   #26 
              - read the plan and of course ...  Pepperbelly   Jan-10-04 02:21 PM   #28 
                 - I'm all for this, but Dean is planning to do the exact same thing.  w4rma   Jan-10-04 02:24 PM   #30 
                    - Where is the plan that says this?  jadesfire   Jan-10-04 06:39 PM   #40 
  - Bush is STEALING the SS revenue to pay for his war & deficit.  stickdog   Jan-10-04 06:17 PM   #35 
  - Except for the part that I, as an employer have to pay  democratreformed   Jan-10-04 12:34 PM   #9 
  - Come on. You just take it out my salary. (nt)  stickdog   Jan-10-04 06:18 PM   #36 
     - FYI  democratreformed   Jan-10-04 11:07 PM   #43 
  - I agree w/ you here and it also hurts employers as well...  familydoctor   Jan-10-04 04:25 PM   #32 
  - And it's lumped into the budget  sandnsea   Jan-10-04 06:34 PM   #39 
  - Just a note, but, as an employer, I pay seperate unemployment taxes. n/t  democratreformed   Jan-10-04 12:35 PM   #10 
  - I was under the impression that the basic outline of his plan  ryharrin   Jan-10-04 12:49 PM   #12 
  - What on earth do you mean? He was going to do this all along.  ClarkGraham2004   Jan-10-04 12:51 PM   #13 
  - Cutting payroll taxes is a fantastic idea!!!!  cally   Jan-10-04 12:58 PM   #14 
  - true  Jim4Wes   Jan-10-04 01:03 PM   #16 
  - You make such an unfounded leap  HFishbine   Jan-10-04 01:04 PM   #17 
  - The payroll tax is higher than it needs to be  quaker bill   Jan-10-04 01:06 PM   #18 
  - Voodoo Economics  nancyharris   Jan-10-04 02:03 PM   #19 
  - It's a tax on income but is assessed quite differently  cally   Jan-10-04 02:12 PM   #23 
     - Not really  nancyharris   Jan-10-04 03:45 PM   #31 
        - yes actually it is different  quaker bill   Jan-10-04 07:17 PM   #41 
           - You are incorrect  nancyharris   Jan-10-04 08:11 PM   #42 
  - NO, that is incorrect  arewethereyet   Jan-10-04 11:15 PM   #44 
  - he's going to get money from the general fund, and that way it won't  slinkerwink   Jan-10-04 02:07 PM   #20 
  - Where did you see that plan?  Bleachers7   Jan-10-04 02:08 PM   #21 
     - it's in the Boston Globe for chrissakes!  slinkerwink   Jan-10-04 02:22 PM   #29 
        - So why doesn't Dean put it on his site.  Bleachers7   Jan-10-04 06:32 PM   #38 
  - If you loan me $50  retyred   Jan-10-04 02:19 PM   #25 
     - I don't think you know what you are talking about, retyred. (n/t)  w4rma   Jan-10-04 02:20 PM   #27 
     - The thing is that the income tax is a progressive tax while  dd123   Jan-10-04 04:34 PM   #33 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC