You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #37: Read my post again [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #18
37. Read my post again
You are letting Rove determine WHO will run... they wanted Dean
becuase he struck them as an easy opponent... now that it is not that
way they are digging. As I said, if Jesus was our candidate they will DIG dirt out... and if we nominated oh Hitler, he would be a Commie

Notice, while they concentrate on this, have they let you know what is Dean's, Clarks, Kucinich's, Sharpton's et al policies? NOPE

They are making this into a horse race (who cares?) but they are not telling you what you need to know to make an informed decision. They are massaging the information... and you are biting.

Now the reason Dean gave for keeping those records sealed, all of them, are valid... and he is right to let a judge deal with this. I do not like secrecy in government, but if I were Gay, I would not want to be exposed... and ideally this would be redacted... but would it? And I know people who are GAY, and who do not want to come out of the closet, as it is not safe to do such... and now it is even more dangerous.

As I said, it does not matter who we nominate... the Rove dirty hunting team is now working 24\7... and I trust them to bring out even more sleaze, to keep you distracted...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Do the Dean tapes make you wonder if hidden records a ticking time bomb? MIMStigator  Jan-09-04 04:04 PM   #0 
  - no  CMT   Jan-09-04 04:09 PM   #1 
  - He Wasn't Consistent On George Stephanopoulos  cryingshame   Jan-09-04 04:29 PM   #16 
  - lets be clear about this  nadinbrzezinski   Jan-09-04 04:10 PM   #2 
  - those records scare me  bearfartinthewoods   Jan-09-04 04:31 PM   #18 
     - Check out this link  democratreformed   Jan-09-04 04:36 PM   # 
     - we are sooooo screwed n/t  bearfartinthewoods   Jan-09-04 05:25 PM   #38 
     - It does tell us something  bowens43   Jan-09-04 04:40 PM   #24 
     - Read my post again  nadinbrzezinski   Jan-09-04 05:24 PM   #37 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-09-04 04:11 PM   #3 
  - but Clark does have a record  CMT   Jan-09-04 04:23 PM   #13 
  - Quibble-Look Up Swett Quote  cryingshame   Jan-09-04 04:32 PM   # 
  - Progressive?  boxster   Jan-09-04 04:47 PM   #25 
  - Clark doesn't have a political record  bowens43   Jan-09-04 04:29 PM   #17 
  - And that will be used against him...............  DumpGump   Jan-09-04 04:49 PM   #26 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-09-04 04:56 PM   #35 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-09-04 04:12 PM   #4 
  - yup sometimes n/t  maddezmom   Jan-09-04 04:50 PM   #27 
  - yes, and here's why  maddezmom   Jan-09-04 04:52 PM   #31 
  - Nope  joefree1   Jan-09-04 04:12 PM   #5 
  - We need to read something like this occasionaly to help keep perspective  auntpattywatty   Jan-09-04 04:18 PM   #10 
  - I don't think  in_cog_ni_to   Jan-09-04 04:12 PM   #6 
  - Rest assured, Rove has plenty on Clark already  YellowDawgDemocrat   Jan-09-04 04:20 PM   #12 
  - I don;t know about the records, but the tapes are a non-issue  Armstead   Jan-09-04 04:14 PM   #7 
  - It doesn't really matter  jmaier   Jan-09-04 04:16 PM   #8 
  - The tapes are a non-issue  Adjoran   Jan-09-04 04:17 PM   #9 
  - Do you ever wonder why Karl Rove still smiles?  Bozola   Jan-09-04 04:18 PM   #11 
  - Am I weird for not thinking these tapes are bad?  GloriaSmith   Jan-09-04 04:24 PM   #14 
  - No - I don't see how they're that bad. But they are hurting him in Iowa  gore-is-my-president   Jan-09-04 04:32 PM   #20 
  - No  bowens43   Jan-09-04 04:27 PM   #15 
  - No (n/t)  goobergunch   Jan-09-04 04:31 PM   #19 
  - Ha ha! That's a good one!  BurtWorm   Jan-09-04 04:33 PM   #21 
  - thee topics on page one about Dean tapes  drfemoe   Jan-09-04 04:34 PM   #22 
  - for sure! Lets face it, if there were anything else positive in there....  jpgpenn   Jan-09-04 04:36 PM   #23 
  - NO. THEY MAKE ME WONDER WHAT YOU WANT  Capn Sunshine   Jan-09-04 04:50 PM   #28 
  - i already posted in the say something nice thread  MIMStigator   Jan-09-04 04:56 PM   #34 
  - You worry more?  Hep   Jan-09-04 04:51 PM   #29 
  - Do Gen. Clark's sealed Pentagon files ever make YOU wonder?  Padraig18   Jan-09-04 04:52 PM   #30 
  - Yeah, what I've learned so far is very shocking...  killbotfactory   Jan-09-04 04:55 PM   #32 
  - Doomed, I say--- DOOMED!  Padraig18   Jan-09-04 04:57 PM   #36 
  - NO  creativelcro   Jan-09-04 04:55 PM   #33 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC