You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #69: It can only go so far. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #64
69. It can only go so far.
Bill Clinton tried the bullying approach. Oops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
  - Gibbs: Obama not taking sides in Stupak amendment debate joeycola  Nov-10-09 07:25 AM   #0 
  - Gee ain't that just swell? nt  Captain Hilts   Nov-10-09 07:27 AM   #1 
  - Just jolly..  joeycola   Nov-10-09 07:31 AM   # 
  - Not half as jolly as the locked OP where you posted an article that was "wistful for Bush" nt  ClarkUSA   Nov-10-09 09:29 AM   #42 
  - "Co-Chair of House pro-choice caucus "enormously encouraged" by Obama statement on Stupak amendment"  ClarkUSA   Nov-10-09 09:46 AM   #50 
  - Jolly this, too, Bitter One: "President Obama is against this Abortion Amendment"  ClarkUSA   Nov-10-09 09:56 AM   #52 
  - I'm taking Obama's words, not Gibbs. Thanks. And O spoke out on this already. n/t  vaberella   Nov-10-09 07:31 AM   #2 
  - That's not the point of this thread.  geek tragedy   Nov-10-09 07:33 AM   #4 
     - I almost forgot about that thread. He loves hit pieces. Even they're BS. n/t  vaberella   Nov-10-09 07:40 AM   #8 
        - One-trick pony.  geek tragedy   Nov-10-09 07:45 AM   #11 
  - Disingenuous, outdated post.  geek tragedy   Nov-10-09 07:31 AM   #3 
  - well, gee, So Gibbs is not speaking for the President??  joeycola   Nov-10-09 07:33 AM   #5 
     - Obama speaks for Obama, and he said that the Stupak amendment  geek tragedy   Nov-10-09 07:34 AM   #6 
     - Over the course of O's term. I've come to realize. Obama speaks for himself!  vaberella   Nov-10-09 07:44 AM   #9 
        - Then he needs to get the White House's message on point. nt  Captain Hilts   Nov-10-09 07:49 AM   #12 
           - So it's up to Obama to go back and update outdated news stories now?  high density   Nov-10-09 07:52 AM   #15 
           - No, Obama needs to be more like George W Bush  geek tragedy   Nov-10-09 08:04 AM   #22 
           - Gibbs was clearly avoiding comment so that Obama himself  geek tragedy   Nov-10-09 07:54 AM   #16 
              - Then he did so poorly  Bluenorthwest   Nov-10-09 08:35 AM   #30 
                 - Okay, Gibbs mishandled a press conference.  geek tragedy   Nov-10-09 08:38 AM   #31 
  - He opposes the amendment  bluestateguy   Nov-10-09 07:37 AM   #7 
  - 'Don't expect Obama to do everything for you.'  IndianaGreen   Nov-10-09 07:51 AM   #14 
  - So, even when he says exactly what the pro-choice  geek tragedy   Nov-10-09 07:55 AM   #17 
  - But Gibbs made a comment--a deceptive comment! According to your "logic" Gibbs  joeycola   Nov-10-09 07:57 AM   #18 
  - What was the deceptive comment?  geek tragedy   Nov-10-09 07:59 AM   #19 
     - Figure it out.....  joeycola   Nov-10-09 08:12 AM   #23 
        - The only deceptive statements  geek tragedy   Nov-10-09 08:14 AM   #25 
  - i don't think he's too worried about the green party juggernaut.  dionysus   Nov-10-09 09:14 AM   #39 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Nov-10-09 08:14 AM   #24 
     - "Go back to the batman movies and leave politics to the grown folks"  Zodiak   Nov-10-09 09:54 AM   #51 
  - I'm sorry; I thought we should expect our LEADERS to LEAD  PVnRT   Nov-10-09 10:10 AM   #58 
     - Does it only count if he does it in CAPITAL LETTERS?  geek tragedy   Nov-10-09 10:11 AM   #60 
  - Diane DeGette: "I am enormously encouraged " by Obama's statement  geek tragedy   Nov-10-09 07:44 AM   #10 
  - I guess Obama didn't get the memo  impik   Nov-10-09 07:51 AM   #13 
  - Those who won't fight have already lost. nt  Deep13   Nov-10-09 08:01 AM   #20 
  - This is a misleading post--Obama has sided with the pro-choice  geek tragedy   Nov-10-09 08:03 AM   #21 
  - OLD ARTICLE!!! Obama's since spoken up about this.  backscatter712   Nov-10-09 08:16 AM   #26 
  - Of course not.  Ed76638   Nov-10-09 08:19 AM   #27 
  - too bad you didn't bother to learn the FACTS  geek tragedy   Nov-10-09 08:21 AM   #28 
     - Thanks for posting this GT. Ugh....so much misinformation and the OP loves spreading it. n/t  vaberella   Nov-10-09 08:32 AM   #29 
     - Still  Ed76638   Nov-10-09 09:40 AM   #46 
        - Congress is a co-equal branch of government.  geek tragedy   Nov-10-09 09:42 AM   #49 
           - That may be the case, but it doesn't reflect reality.  Ed76638   Nov-10-09 10:15 AM   #64 
              - It can only go so far.  geek tragedy   Nov-10-09 10:28 AM   #69 
                 - So did Bush.  Ed76638   Nov-10-09 10:32 AM   #71 
                 - How did Bush's attempt to privatize social security work out? nt  geek tragedy   Nov-10-09 10:33 AM   #75 
                    - Because popular opinion was against that shit.  Ed76638   Nov-10-09 10:36 AM   #78 
                 - You know what, I'm going to be honest.  Ed76638   Nov-10-09 10:35 AM   #76 
  - wow, back for more so soon? i thought you were reminiscing about your hero W.  dionysus   Nov-10-09 08:45 AM   #32 
  - I guess the OP would have preferred if Gibbs  geek tragedy   Nov-10-09 08:57 AM   #33 
  - That ain't surprising.  Beacool   Nov-10-09 09:02 AM   #34 
  - Not surprising that you would bash him using a tired  geek tragedy   Nov-10-09 09:07 AM   #36 
  - Too bad you didn't read the rest of this thread. You'd find out that Obama has  NYCGirl   Nov-10-09 09:08 AM   #38 
  - now Bea, it's too early in the day to start a kerfluffle!  dionysus   Nov-10-09 09:15 AM   #40 
  - You know me, I like to ruffle the feathers of the fan club.  Beacool   Nov-10-09 09:27 AM   #41 
  - Why do you care? You didn't even vote for him, according to your own words:  Starbucks Anarchist   Nov-10-09 09:41 AM   #47 
  - That was about the primaries.  Beacool   Nov-10-09 10:04 AM   #54 
     - Apparently it still is. nt  geek tragedy   Nov-10-09 10:10 AM   #59 
  - She lost.  jefferson_dem   Nov-10-09 10:33 AM   #74 
     - Condescending much?  Beacool   Nov-10-09 12:36 PM   #82 
  - Section 236 of Stupak and section 507 are 99% the same!!!  uponit7771   Nov-10-09 09:07 AM   #35 
  - Shame on the anti-chioce, Obama hating trolls who recommend  geek tragedy   Nov-10-09 09:08 AM   #37 
  - All the usual suspects high-fiving this OP and recced this out-of-date OP are Very Very Bitter. nt  ClarkUSA   Nov-10-09 09:31 AM   #43 
     - clinging too. nt  geek tragedy   Nov-10-09 09:33 AM   #44 
        - You forgot about the guns.  Beacool   Nov-10-09 10:06 AM   #55 
           - Well, you did shoot off your mouth here without learning  geek tragedy   Nov-10-09 10:09 AM   #57 
              - Well, you are doing a fine job defending him in every post.  Beacool   Nov-10-09 10:13 AM   #63 
                 - You sing along with Harriet Christian and Amy Siskind.  geek tragedy   Nov-10-09 10:15 AM   #65 
                    - I'm not familiar with either woman.  Beacool   Nov-10-09 10:18 AM   #66 
                       - O rly? You went out of your way to defend ol Ms. Racist Harriet  geek tragedy   Nov-10-09 10:27 AM   #68 
                          - Oh, that woman.  Beacool   Nov-10-09 12:34 PM   #81 
  - Whaaat????  spiritual_gunfighter   Nov-10-09 09:38 AM   #45 
  - You speak from a position of ignorance and/or malice.  geek tragedy   Nov-10-09 09:42 AM   #48 
     - I speak from exasperation  spiritual_gunfighter   Nov-10-09 09:59 AM   #53 
        - Agrees with me: the chair of the house pro-choice caucus.  geek tragedy   Nov-10-09 10:08 AM   #56 
           - Keep defending all you want  spiritual_gunfighter   Nov-10-09 10:11 AM   #61 
              - I'm proud of what Obama said. There's nothing to defend.  geek tragedy   Nov-10-09 10:13 AM   #62 
              - My criticism isn't for Obama coming out against the Stupak amendment  spiritual_gunfighter   Nov-10-09 10:36 AM   #77 
                 - Obama said he wanted to prevent the status quo from being changed as he last position not his first  uponit7771   Nov-10-09 10:39 AM   #79 
                 - "Fully support."  geek tragedy   Nov-10-09 10:40 AM   #80 
              - Why continue to spread ignorance when confronted with facts?  jefferson_dem   Nov-10-09 10:32 AM   #72 
  - A totally misleading headline from "The Hill"!? No way! nt  Bonobo   Nov-10-09 10:21 AM   #67 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Nov-10-09 10:30 AM   #70 
  - A load of crap as usual from this poster...  Spazito   Nov-10-09 10:32 AM   #73 
  - Even Gibbs was surprised!  freddie mertz   Nov-10-09 12:38 PM   #83 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC