Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-10-09 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
| - Gibbs: Obama not taking sides in Stupak amendment debate |
joeycola |
Nov-10-09 07:25 AM |
#0 |
-
Gee ain't that just swell? nt |
Captain Hilts |
Nov-10-09 07:27 AM |
#1 |
 -
Just jolly.. |
joeycola |
Nov-10-09 07:31 AM |
# |
  -
Not half as jolly as the locked OP where you posted an article that was "wistful for Bush" nt |
ClarkUSA |
Nov-10-09 09:29 AM |
#42 |
 -
"Co-Chair of House pro-choice caucus "enormously encouraged" by Obama statement on Stupak amendment" |
ClarkUSA |
Nov-10-09 09:46 AM |
#50 |
 -
Jolly this, too, Bitter One: "President Obama is against this Abortion Amendment" |
ClarkUSA |
Nov-10-09 09:56 AM |
#52 |
-
I'm taking Obama's words, not Gibbs. Thanks. And O spoke out on this already. n/t |
vaberella |
Nov-10-09 07:31 AM |
#2 |
 -
That's not the point of this thread. |
geek tragedy |
Nov-10-09 07:33 AM |
#4 |
-
I almost forgot about that thread. He loves hit pieces. Even they're BS. n/t |
vaberella |
Nov-10-09 07:40 AM |
#8 |
-
One-trick pony. |
geek tragedy |
Nov-10-09 07:45 AM |
#11 |
-
Disingenuous, outdated post. |
geek tragedy |
Nov-10-09 07:31 AM |
#3 |
 -
well, gee, So Gibbs is not speaking for the President?? |
joeycola |
Nov-10-09 07:33 AM |
#5 |
-
Obama speaks for Obama, and he said that the Stupak amendment |
geek tragedy |
Nov-10-09 07:34 AM |
#6 |
-
Over the course of O's term. I've come to realize. Obama speaks for himself! |
vaberella |
Nov-10-09 07:44 AM |
#9 |
-
Then he needs to get the White House's message on point. nt |
Captain Hilts |
Nov-10-09 07:49 AM |
#12 |
-
So it's up to Obama to go back and update outdated news stories now? |
high density |
Nov-10-09 07:52 AM |
#15 |
 -
No, Obama needs to be more like George W Bush |
geek tragedy |
Nov-10-09 08:04 AM |
#22 |
-
Gibbs was clearly avoiding comment so that Obama himself |
geek tragedy |
Nov-10-09 07:54 AM |
#16 |
-
Then he did so poorly |
Bluenorthwest |
Nov-10-09 08:35 AM |
#30 |
-
Okay, Gibbs mishandled a press conference. |
geek tragedy |
Nov-10-09 08:38 AM |
#31 |
-
He opposes the amendment |
bluestateguy |
Nov-10-09 07:37 AM |
#7 |
 -
'Don't expect Obama to do everything for you.' |
IndianaGreen |
Nov-10-09 07:51 AM |
#14 |
  -
So, even when he says exactly what the pro-choice |
geek tragedy |
Nov-10-09 07:55 AM |
#17 |
   -
But Gibbs made a comment--a deceptive comment! According to your "logic" Gibbs |
joeycola |
Nov-10-09 07:57 AM |
#18 |
    -
What was the deceptive comment? |
geek tragedy |
Nov-10-09 07:59 AM |
#19 |
   -
Figure it out..... |
joeycola |
Nov-10-09 08:12 AM |
#23 |
   -
The only deceptive statements |
geek tragedy |
Nov-10-09 08:14 AM |
#25 |
   -
i don't think he's too worried about the green party juggernaut. |
dionysus |
Nov-10-09 09:14 AM |
#39 |
  -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-10-09 08:14 AM |
#24 |
 -
"Go back to the batman movies and leave politics to the grown folks" |
Zodiak |
Nov-10-09 09:54 AM |
#51 |
 -
I'm sorry; I thought we should expect our LEADERS to LEAD |
PVnRT |
Nov-10-09 10:10 AM |
#58 |
-
Does it only count if he does it in CAPITAL LETTERS? |
geek tragedy |
Nov-10-09 10:11 AM |
#60 |
-
Diane DeGette: "I am enormously encouraged " by Obama's statement |
geek tragedy |
Nov-10-09 07:44 AM |
#10 |
-
I guess Obama didn't get the memo |
impik |
Nov-10-09 07:51 AM |
#13 |
-
Those who won't fight have already lost. nt |
Deep13 |
Nov-10-09 08:01 AM |
#20 |
 -
This is a misleading post--Obama has sided with the pro-choice |
geek tragedy |
Nov-10-09 08:03 AM |
#21 |
-
OLD ARTICLE!!! Obama's since spoken up about this. |
backscatter712 |
Nov-10-09 08:16 AM |
#26 |
-
Of course not. |
Ed76638 |
Nov-10-09 08:19 AM |
#27 |
 -
too bad you didn't bother to learn the FACTS |
geek tragedy |
Nov-10-09 08:21 AM |
#28 |
-
Thanks for posting this GT. Ugh....so much misinformation and the OP loves spreading it. n/t |
vaberella |
Nov-10-09 08:32 AM |
#29 |
-
Still |
Ed76638 |
Nov-10-09 09:40 AM |
#46 |
-
Congress is a co-equal branch of government. |
geek tragedy |
Nov-10-09 09:42 AM |
#49 |
-
That may be the case, but it doesn't reflect reality. |
Ed76638 |
Nov-10-09 10:15 AM |
#64 |
-
It can only go so far. |
geek tragedy |
Nov-10-09 10:28 AM |
#69 |
-
So did Bush. |
Ed76638 |
Nov-10-09 10:32 AM |
#71 |
 -
How did Bush's attempt to privatize social security work out? nt |
geek tragedy |
Nov-10-09 10:33 AM |
#75 |
-
Because popular opinion was against that shit. |
Ed76638 |
Nov-10-09 10:36 AM |
#78 |
-
You know what, I'm going to be honest. |
Ed76638 |
Nov-10-09 10:35 AM |
#76 |
-
wow, back for more so soon? i thought you were reminiscing about your hero W. |
dionysus |
Nov-10-09 08:45 AM |
#32 |
 -
I guess the OP would have preferred if Gibbs |
geek tragedy |
Nov-10-09 08:57 AM |
#33 |
-
That ain't surprising. |
Beacool |
Nov-10-09 09:02 AM |
#34 |
 -
Not surprising that you would bash him using a tired |
geek tragedy |
Nov-10-09 09:07 AM |
#36 |
 -
Too bad you didn't read the rest of this thread. You'd find out that Obama has |
NYCGirl |
Nov-10-09 09:08 AM |
#38 |
 -
now Bea, it's too early in the day to start a kerfluffle! |
dionysus |
Nov-10-09 09:15 AM |
#40 |
  -
You know me, I like to ruffle the feathers of the fan club. |
Beacool |
Nov-10-09 09:27 AM |
#41 |
 -
Why do you care? You didn't even vote for him, according to your own words: |
Starbucks Anarchist |
Nov-10-09 09:41 AM |
#47 |
  -
That was about the primaries. |
Beacool |
Nov-10-09 10:04 AM |
#54 |
 -
Apparently it still is. nt |
geek tragedy |
Nov-10-09 10:10 AM |
#59 |
 -
She lost. |
jefferson_dem |
Nov-10-09 10:33 AM |
#74 |
-
Condescending much? |
Beacool |
Nov-10-09 12:36 PM |
#82 |
-
Section 236 of Stupak and section 507 are 99% the same!!! |
uponit7771 |
Nov-10-09 09:07 AM |
#35 |
-
Shame on the anti-chioce, Obama hating trolls who recommend |
geek tragedy |
Nov-10-09 09:08 AM |
#37 |
 -
All the usual suspects high-fiving this OP and recced this out-of-date OP are Very Very Bitter. nt |
ClarkUSA |
Nov-10-09 09:31 AM |
#43 |
-
clinging too. nt |
geek tragedy |
Nov-10-09 09:33 AM |
#44 |
-
You forgot about the guns. |
Beacool |
Nov-10-09 10:06 AM |
#55 |
-
Well, you did shoot off your mouth here without learning |
geek tragedy |
Nov-10-09 10:09 AM |
#57 |
-
Well, you are doing a fine job defending him in every post. |
Beacool |
Nov-10-09 10:13 AM |
#63 |
-
You sing along with Harriet Christian and Amy Siskind. |
geek tragedy |
Nov-10-09 10:15 AM |
#65 |
-
I'm not familiar with either woman. |
Beacool |
Nov-10-09 10:18 AM |
#66 |
-
O rly? You went out of your way to defend ol Ms. Racist Harriet |
geek tragedy |
Nov-10-09 10:27 AM |
#68 |
-
Oh, that woman. |
Beacool |
Nov-10-09 12:34 PM |
#81 |
-
Whaaat???? |
spiritual_gunfighter |
Nov-10-09 09:38 AM |
#45 |
 -
You speak from a position of ignorance and/or malice. |
geek tragedy |
Nov-10-09 09:42 AM |
#48 |
-
I speak from exasperation |
spiritual_gunfighter |
Nov-10-09 09:59 AM |
#53 |
-
Agrees with me: the chair of the house pro-choice caucus. |
geek tragedy |
Nov-10-09 10:08 AM |
#56 |
-
Keep defending all you want |
spiritual_gunfighter |
Nov-10-09 10:11 AM |
#61 |
-
I'm proud of what Obama said. There's nothing to defend. |
geek tragedy |
Nov-10-09 10:13 AM |
#62 |
 -
My criticism isn't for Obama coming out against the Stupak amendment |
spiritual_gunfighter |
Nov-10-09 10:36 AM |
#77 |
-
Obama said he wanted to prevent the status quo from being changed as he last position not his first |
uponit7771 |
Nov-10-09 10:39 AM |
#79 |
-
"Fully support." |
geek tragedy |
Nov-10-09 10:40 AM |
#80 |
-
Why continue to spread ignorance when confronted with facts? |
jefferson_dem |
Nov-10-09 10:32 AM |
#72 |
-
A totally misleading headline from "The Hill"!? No way! nt |
Bonobo |
Nov-10-09 10:21 AM |
#67 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-10-09 10:30 AM |
#70 |
-
A load of crap as usual from this poster... |
Spazito |
Nov-10-09 10:32 AM |
#73 |
-
Even Gibbs was surprised! |
freddie mertz |
Nov-10-09 12:38 PM |
#83 |