You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #56: My statement is true because [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #52
56. My statement is true because
if the insurance company ignores that section, there are no teeth to penalize them, and they profit from it. If they can profit from violating a law, and get away with it, they will.

You will be able to wag your finger at them and tell them they violated the new law, but you can't stop them. All you will be empowered to do is complain to the new insurance oversight agency that is being created.

That agency, if they CHOOSE, could investigate. If they choose to investigate and find that anything was done wrong they can ADVISE the state agency to investigate too and issue penalties.

If the state agency then CHOOSES to follow suit and CHOOSES to issue penalties, they can issue a fine. They might also order the Insurance company to reverse their decision.

However, after all the time it would have taken to reach that point through the various bureaucracies, reinstating your insurance will be either too late (for a service that was needed immediately) or irrelevant (if you needed insurance so urgently that you were forced to get a new policy in the meantime). Reinstating your insurance is only meaningful if you weren't really using it yet.

If the insurance company is issued a fine for canceling your policy, they'll be able to afford to eat that fine. The savings from canceling your insurance is higher than the mandated fines that are ever likely to be approved by a state agency.

Most likely the department that canceled your insurance won't even be aware that there was a dispute and that it resulted in a fine. Another department would fight disputes and take the fines. Insulating the acting department from the punishing feedback is a common corporate way of ensuring that abusive behavior continues. They never get the feedback to stop. They don't know about the fine. They are under instructions to keep doing business as usual.

That's how.

The short answer for all of this is that there are always two sides to every story, the official answer and the truth. The official answer is that canceling policies is prohibited. The truth is that canceling policies will still be profitable, there will be no reason for them not to, and no significant penalty if they do.

They will break that clause with impunity, because the enforcement has been compromised precisely so that they can break it with impunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC