You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #6: A rec is a sign of approval, not truth [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. A rec is a sign of approval, not truth
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
  -Senator Reid will include an anti-abortion amendment in final Senate healthcare bill Better Believe It  Nov-09-09 03:58 PM   #0 
  - unrec'd, eh? DU is becoming as truth-adverse as Freerepublic, sadly enough...  villager   Nov-09-09 04:01 PM   #1 
  - A rec is a sign of approval, not truth  Demeter   Nov-09-09 04:02 PM   #6 
  - I consider a rec to be so people  WyLoochka   Nov-09-09 04:34 PM   #17 
  - the amendment is not anti-abortion, it is anti-subsidy. That is the truth.  Aramchek   Nov-09-09 04:03 PM   #7 
  - Maybe it's because Politico is a RW outlet?  tridim   Nov-09-09 04:11 PM   #11 
     - I don't unrecommend any posts because that's undemocratic.  Better Believe It   Nov-09-09 04:14 PM   #13 
     - so you're saying, specifically, that Reid's spokesman didn't say that in an email?  villager   Nov-09-09 04:29 PM   #14 
        - Right. You can only believe what appears in "tridim's" list of reliable media sources.  Better Believe It   Nov-09-09 04:41 PM   #22 
           - Jesus christ would you fucking relax.  tridim   Nov-09-09 04:46 PM   #25 
              - Which means what, exactly?  Dreamer Tatum   Nov-09-09 04:55 PM   #26 
              - Which means it MIGHT be the reason that the OP was unrecced  tridim   Nov-09-09 05:39 PM   #27 
              - So the story is a lie? Links please!  Better Believe It   Nov-09-09 06:41 PM   #28 
                 - Never claimed it was, you're overreacting.  tridim   Nov-09-09 06:43 PM   #29 
  - Gee, who coulda seen that coming? eom  Hello_Kitty   Nov-09-09 04:01 PM   #2 
  - Words fail...  Kurt_and_Hunter   Nov-09-09 04:01 PM   #3 
  - Of Course Harry Will  Demeter   Nov-09-09 04:02 PM   #4 
  - Well, that's nice.  Deep13   Nov-09-09 04:02 PM   #5 
  - Well of course, if we couldn't get it passed by the house with it in there it certainly wouldn't  WI_DEM   Nov-09-09 04:03 PM   #8 
  - Big surprise, hey?  Better Believe It   Nov-09-09 04:06 PM   #10 
  - Know what I want for Christmas? A NEW SENATE MAJORITY LEADER!!!  tblue   Nov-09-09 04:04 PM   #9 
  - I never liked Harry Reid!  Leo The Cleo   Nov-09-09 04:13 PM   #12 
  - I have no problem with Reid getting beat  Thrill   Nov-09-09 04:32 PM   #15 
  - beat with a hose?  Leo The Cleo   Nov-09-09 04:33 PM   #16 
     - In his re-election bid  Thrill   Nov-09-09 04:36 PM   #19 
  - This is a bad bill that further infringes on reproductive rights  IndianaGreen   Nov-09-09 04:36 PM   #18 
  - I dislike Reid immensely.  Jennicut   Nov-09-09 04:37 PM   #20 
  - Might as well, since this thing won't become law without the anti-abortion provision  Freddie Stubbs   Nov-09-09 04:40 PM   #21 
  - It's chess! Stupak will be removed in conference after being passed by both houses.  Kurt_and_Hunter   Nov-09-09 04:43 PM   #23 
  - Glad you made that joke part clear - I was getting worried. nt  polichick   Nov-09-09 04:46 PM   #24 
  - eek - I didn't realize that Reid was an anti-choicer.  kath   Nov-09-09 07:00 PM   #30 
  - He's also the leading right-wing Mormon in the Democratic Party  Better Believe It   Nov-09-09 07:53 PM   #31 
  - I'll wait for the bill. You also pushed that Reid wouldn't put the PO in the final bill.  vaberella   Nov-09-09 07:56 PM   #32 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC