Beacool
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-09-09 03:23 PM
Original message |
| I'm more ashamed of the Democratic party compromising on women's rights |
|
for the sake of a poorly drafted bill.
|
| -BREAKING: Democratic Party is now Anti-Women and run by the Pope!!! :sarcasm: |
Aramchek |
Nov-09-09 02:49 PM |
#0 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-09-09 02:49 PM |
#1 |
-
because the anti-choice compromise was so progressive and "pro-woman?" |
villager |
Nov-09-09 02:49 PM |
#2 |
 -
there are currently no subsidies for abortion, there will be none in the bill |
Aramchek |
Nov-09-09 02:54 PM |
#6 |
-
horseshit! It prohibits insurance companies from offering coverate they *already* offer! |
villager |
Nov-09-09 02:56 PM |
#8 |
-
do you have text from the amendment supporting that? |
Aramchek |
Nov-09-09 02:59 PM |
#10 |
 -
Since you can't be bothered yourself: |
villager |
Nov-09-09 03:02 PM |
#13 |
-
this is not text from the Amendment, it is a distorted description of it. |
Aramchek |
Nov-09-09 03:08 PM |
#21 |
-
Ah, Aramcheck prounounces Planned Parenthood a "distortion" |
villager |
Nov-09-09 03:12 PM |
#22 |
-
can you provide real evidence for this from the text of the amendment? |
Aramchek |
Nov-09-09 03:16 PM |
#27 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-09-09 03:18 PM |
#29 |
-
so you cannot provide evidence, but you still believe it. amazing! |
Aramchek |
Nov-09-09 03:24 PM |
#40 |
-
Whereas I provide links to sources, you provide none! Amazing! |
villager |
Nov-09-09 04:04 PM |
#58 |
-
I provided a link to to Amendment text in the OP, and a cut n paste of the text further down. |
Aramchek |
Nov-09-09 04:09 PM |
#64 |
-
How is it going to be any different than things stand now? |
ClarkUSA |
Nov-09-09 03:03 PM |
#16 |
-
You're also free to "bother," and read the Planned Parenthood release |
villager |
Nov-09-09 03:05 PM |
#17 |
 -
That's not answering my question. The press release is full of overheated rhetoric. nt |
ClarkUSA |
Nov-09-09 03:12 PM |
#23 |
-
And ClarkUSA calls Planned Parenthood and NARAL "overheated!" |
villager |
Nov-09-09 03:14 PM |
#24 |
-
You're being dishonest and trying to distract from my salient points which debunk your rhetoric. |
ClarkUSA |
Nov-09-09 03:21 PM |
#36 |
-
"Facts don't matter" The new rallying cry of HCR opposition |
Aramchek |
Nov-09-09 03:26 PM |
#43 |
-
A few can discuss issues maturely without rancor or vitriol; most resort to vitriolic obfuscation. |
ClarkUSA |
Nov-09-09 03:36 PM |
#46 |
-
I'm waitng to see if you're one of them.... |
villager |
Nov-09-09 03:44 PM |
#49 |
-
I have been. You've been dishonest in your statements and refuse to offer facts from the Amendment. |
ClarkUSA |
Nov-09-09 04:01 PM |
#55 |
-
Nor can you offer "facts" from the amendment rebutting the analyses |
villager |
Nov-09-09 04:03 PM |
#56 |
-
You really cannot answer my original question, can you? Because there is no difference. |
ClarkUSA |
Nov-09-09 04:07 PM |
#61 |
-
Okay -- for going round and round and *offering nothing of substance* |
villager |
Nov-09-09 04:07 PM |
#63 |
-
you are proven wrong, and you choose to ignore it. that doesn't speak highly of you. |
Aramchek |
Nov-09-09 04:11 PM |
#66 |
 -
as you already know: |
villager |
Nov-09-09 04:14 PM |
#68 |
-
but for some odd reason, you cannot point to the text of the Amendment that states this |
Aramchek |
Nov-09-09 04:18 PM |
#73 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-09-09 04:12 PM |
#67 |
 -
that's one of our biggest problems. Age says nothing about how 'Adult' you are. |
Aramchek |
Nov-09-09 04:34 PM |
#81 |
-
It's an eternal human problem but here the bitter Failers usually fall in that category. |
ClarkUSA |
Nov-09-09 04:48 PM |
#85 |
-
You offer only strawman arguments and false assertions instead of the facts we've asked for. |
ClarkUSA |
Nov-09-09 04:43 PM |
#83 |
-
But under this bill, IF they want to buy that separate policy, they will be penalized in |
T Wolf |
Nov-09-09 03:08 PM |
#20 |
 -
got text? or did someone else tell you this? |
Aramchek |
Nov-09-09 03:18 PM |
#28 |
  -
Got text proving all these "hysterical women's" groups wrong? |
villager |
Nov-09-09 03:19 PM |
#31 |
 -
Why are you putting quotes around a comment that was never said by anyone on this thread except you? |
ClarkUSA |
Nov-09-09 03:26 PM |
#42 |
  -
Let's just say I trust NARAL and Planned Parenthood and women in general far far more |
villager |
Nov-09-09 03:43 PM |
#47 |
 -
or even your own eyes, eh? |
Aramchek |
Nov-09-09 03:44 PM |
#50 |
  -
One more time before the ignore list: Offer language that rebuts the analsyses |
villager |
Nov-09-09 04:04 PM |
#57 |
 -
The "analyses" you mention does not provide a shred of data to back up its rhetoric. nt |
ClarkUSA |
Nov-09-09 04:09 PM |
#65 |
 -
I gave a direct quote from the Amendment, that wasn't good enough for this person |
Aramchek |
Nov-09-09 04:30 PM |
#80 |
 -
You never answer questions, do you? Gee, I wonder why. nt |
ClarkUSA |
Nov-09-09 03:50 PM |
#54 |
 -
No, you don't. Nary a link, Gee, I wonder why. |
villager |
Nov-09-09 04:05 PM |
#59 |
 -
Your "analyses" is a series of statements without a shred of data to back them up. |
ClarkUSA |
Nov-09-09 04:15 PM |
#70 |
 -
I provided a link to the full text of the amendment in my OP |
Aramchek |
Nov-09-09 03:43 PM |
#48 |
 -
well, you skillfully excerpted, sure |
villager |
Nov-09-09 04:06 PM |
#60 |
 -
holy crap, your head is rock hard. I didn't 'excerpt skilfully'. I provided the exact text. |
Aramchek |
Nov-09-09 04:15 PM |
#69 |
 -
It's a five page amendment. Sheesh. |
villager |
Nov-09-09 04:17 PM |
#72 |
  -
yes, 5 whole pages. Is that just too much for you to read? |
Aramchek |
Nov-09-09 04:22 PM |
#76 |
 -
And you didn't reproduce the section that comes before this! |
villager |
Nov-09-09 04:19 PM |
#74 |
 -
section (a) restricts the use of federal subsidies for abortion coverage, |
Aramchek |
Nov-09-09 04:25 PM |
#78 |
 -
Again, how is that qualitatively different from what happens now? |
ClarkUSA |
Nov-09-09 03:19 PM |
#32 |
-
Point is it will become unavailable becasue the insurance corps will not offer it in order |
T Wolf |
Nov-09-09 03:26 PM |
#41 |
-
Do you have any data to back up your statements? I'd be interested in seeing it. |
ClarkUSA |
Nov-09-09 03:32 PM |
#45 |
-
exactly so, T Wolf.... |
villager |
Nov-09-09 04:07 PM |
#62 |
-
Facts? .. |
Cha |
Nov-09-09 04:21 PM |
#75 |
-
Yeah, it's always the bitter Failers that are the most dishonest. |
ClarkUSA |
Nov-09-09 04:26 PM |
#79 |
-
Yeah, a lot of people I respect |
Cha |
Nov-09-09 04:44 PM |
#84 |
-
Um... |
jefferson_dem |
Nov-09-09 02:52 PM |
#3 |
 -
you have seen the barrage of posts around here lately, haven't you? |
Aramchek |
Nov-09-09 02:53 PM |
#4 |
-
I've seen bunches... |
jefferson_dem |
Nov-09-09 02:55 PM |
#7 |
-
I just can't believe all the dishonesty in pursuit of their aims. |
Aramchek |
Nov-09-09 03:03 PM |
#14 |
-
and yet, your dishonesty nearly trumps them all... |
villager |
Nov-09-09 03:19 PM |
#33 |
-
Is Baghdad Bob a hero of yours? nt |
ClarkUSA |
Nov-09-09 04:22 PM |
#77 |
-
I have provided proof for everything I say. You have provided nothing but vitriol. |
Aramchek |
Nov-09-09 04:36 PM |
#82 |
-
At least you're a man. |
Beacool |
Nov-09-09 02:54 PM |
#5 |
 -
wow. are you not ashamed at this attempt to turn women against HCR? |
Aramchek |
Nov-09-09 02:57 PM |
#9 |
  -
I'm ashamed of a backdoor slap down the back alley |
texastoast |
Nov-09-09 03:06 PM |
#18 |
   -
read the amendment before you believe the conclusions some have jumped to |
Aramchek |
Nov-09-09 03:19 PM |
#30 |
  -
I'm more ashamed of the Democratic party compromising on women's rights |
Beacool |
Nov-09-09 03:23 PM |
# |
 -
Funny... Debbie Wasserman-Schultz isn't "ashamed" she helped move the bill forward by voting "Aye". |
ClarkUSA |
Nov-09-09 03:44 PM |
#51 |
 -
How sexist of you. nt |
ClarkUSA |
Nov-09-09 03:06 PM |
#19 |
-
Shoo......... |
Beacool |
Nov-09-09 03:20 PM |
#34 |
-
i'm not even going near this aspect of the bill... |
dionysus |
Nov-09-09 03:30 PM |
#44 |
 -
A banky for me? |
Beacool |
Nov-09-09 03:46 PM |
#52 |
-
Yes, the truth about your hypocrisy is inconvenient. Chris Matthews has company! nt |
ClarkUSA |
Nov-09-09 03:49 PM |
#53 |
-
Sorry, saw the sarc tag late |
stevenleser |
Nov-09-09 03:01 PM |
#11 |
-
Half this site hates Obama, hates every Democrat not named |
geek tragedy |
Nov-09-09 03:02 PM |
#12 |
 -
LOL |
Forkboy |
Nov-09-09 03:16 PM |
#26 |
 -
according to my rec thread from yesterday, they represent about 25% of DU |
Aramchek |
Nov-09-09 03:20 PM |
#35 |
 -
hoo boy |
Starry Messenger |
Nov-09-09 04:16 PM |
#71 |
-
So throwing women under the bus is OK with you? |
Odin2005 |
Nov-09-09 03:03 PM |
#15 |
 -
that is not what happened. if you read the amendment yourself, you would see that. |
Aramchek |
Nov-09-09 03:22 PM |
#37 |
 -
Nobody's being thrown under any bus. |
jefferson_dem |
Nov-09-09 03:23 PM |
#39 |
-
Most of the Dems are actually very pro-woman. How do people fail to realize |
Jennicut |
Nov-09-09 03:15 PM |
#25 |
-
Rosa did the right thing. |
Aramchek |
Nov-09-09 03:23 PM |
#38 |