You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #17: In 17 states it is [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
17. In 17 states it is
which under Stupak the simliar private senario can't take place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
  -I am on Medicare. Abortion is not covered. Undercurrent  Nov-08-09 11:37 PM   #0 
  - It used to be covered.  Lars39   Nov-08-09 11:38 PM   #1 
  - It's sadly true  Undercurrent   Nov-08-09 11:50 PM   #5 
  - Not to my knowledge... nt  ChicagoSuz219   Nov-09-09 12:58 AM   #11 
  - Here ya go:  Lars39   Nov-09-09 01:15 PM   #14 
     - Thanks... not for 32 years...  ChicagoSuz219   Nov-09-09 04:59 PM   #16 
  - Because we have less of a Democratic party than previous generations  Sebastian Doyle   Nov-09-09 07:52 PM   #30 
  - Oh Honey maybe you could have an alien visit tonight.  rwheeler31   Nov-08-09 11:41 PM   #2 
  - LOL  Undercurrent   Nov-08-09 11:51 PM   #6 
  - I don't think it's a reason to scrap it, either.  ezgoingrl   Nov-08-09 11:43 PM   #3 
  - The Stupak amendment is designed to make it illegal or  dflprincess   Nov-08-09 11:45 PM   #4 
  - Absolutely right!!!  BrklynLiberal   Nov-09-09 12:00 AM   #7 
  - Link please?  BklnDem75   Nov-09-09 12:43 AM   #8 
  - It also makes the Hyde amendment permannent as opposed to  saracat   Nov-09-09 12:51 AM   #9 
     - Link?  demwing   Nov-09-09 12:55 AM   #10 
     - Yes and what riders are demanded for any other medical treatments?  saracat   Nov-09-09 06:10 PM   #24 
     - Hmmm... let's see...  BklnDem75   Nov-09-09 01:01 AM   #12 
  - Actually, the house bill expands contraceptive coverage rather than shrinks it.  quiller4   Nov-09-09 03:09 PM   #15 
  - you are wrong. look at the text of the amendment.  Aramchek   Nov-09-09 05:40 PM   #22 
     - So women must pay the mandate and the premiums and yet must purchase a rider to be  saracat   Nov-09-09 06:12 PM   #25 
        - they have to pay extra for abortion coverage now, nothing will change  Aramchek   Nov-09-09 06:27 PM   #26 
           - Not under all policies they don't and so reproductive care poor women still won't be able to afford  saracat   Nov-09-09 06:39 PM   #27 
              - poor women don't get federally funded abortion at present  Aramchek   Nov-09-09 07:32 PM   #28 
                 - So why is it then a restriction? Any woman who receives any kind of subsidy is banned from buying  saracat   Nov-09-09 08:29 PM   #31 
                    - that is not what the amendment says.  Aramchek   Nov-09-09 08:48 PM   #32 
                       - It does stipulate if you are receiving any form of subsidy that you cannot purchase private  saracat   Nov-09-09 09:01 PM   #33 
                          - do you have any real text for that, or is it just hearsay?  Aramchek   Nov-09-09 09:22 PM   #34 
                             - Sections A and B from your own posting olf the Amendment stipulate that  saracat   Nov-09-09 09:27 PM   #35 
                             - it says you can't buy a abortion plan with any federal help. that is clear  Aramchek   Nov-09-09 10:11 PM   #38 
                             - And you might read this to read to comprehend  saracat   Nov-09-09 09:47 PM   #37 
                                - all that says is that abortion can't be in a plan that is purchased with any type of subsidy  Aramchek   Nov-09-09 10:14 PM   #39 
                                   - None of the pro choice groups agree with your interpretation  saracat   Nov-09-09 11:54 PM   #40 
                                      - What did these folks say exactly and what was their proof?  stevenleser   Nov-10-09 12:10 AM   #41 
                                         - Here are several links:  saracat   Nov-10-09 12:33 AM   #42 
                                            - I read them and decided to download the full bill and stupak amendment in .pdf form  stevenleser   Nov-10-09 12:36 AM   #43 
                                               - I have read it as well and you are WRONG. Who are you to decide all those people are mistaken?  saracat   Nov-10-09 12:44 AM   #44 
  - So do DUers now have to campaign to get rid of evil Medicare?  stray cat   Nov-09-09 07:12 AM   #13 
  - That's the ticket!  high density   Nov-09-09 05:02 PM   #18 
  - In 17 states it is  dsc   Nov-09-09 05:01 PM   #17 
  - don't compare it medicare  optimator   Nov-09-09 05:36 PM   #19 
  - you are a brave and honest soul. be prepared to be called a woman-hater  Aramchek   Nov-09-09 05:37 PM   #20 
  - She's a woman  prolesunited   Nov-09-09 05:39 PM   #21 
     - I know. Rationality doesn't effect those who would attack her.  Aramchek   Nov-09-09 05:44 PM   #23 
  - Ya know, about women on SSDI and Medicare  mentalsolstice   Nov-09-09 07:38 PM   #29 
  - here  Skittles   Nov-09-09 09:38 PM   #36 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC