You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #59: Well, if thousands more people have to die [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #13
59. Well, if thousands more people have to die
before we craft and have enough VOTES in Congress to pass the "perfect" bill, so be it. :eyes:

BTW, I'm a woman and have been with DU since the beginning, so don't bother calling me a misogynist or an interloper.

I loathe the Stupak amendment, but if we can't get it out before reform is enacted, I would rather have that than no reform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
  -WHAT'S BETTER? 3962 with Stupak or NO bill at all? RoadRage  Nov-08-09 10:22 PM   #0 
  - This bill is unacceptable.  bluetrain   Nov-08-09 10:24 PM   #1 
  - So, in your opinion it is worse then nothing? We'd be better of with No Healtcare plan at all?  RoadRage   Nov-08-09 10:29 PM   #2 
     - It reduces women to less than equal status under the law. Yes, it's worse than nothing.  bluetrain   Nov-08-09 10:34 PM   #4 
        - How?  RoadRage   Nov-08-09 10:51 PM   #8 
        - Full coverage should mean full coverage for everyone, even women. This is a civil rights issue.  bluetrain   Nov-08-09 10:55 PM   #10 
        - Let's say you choose the public option under this bill and you qualify for...  Hepburn   Nov-09-09 09:09 AM   #29 
        - I don't feel discriminated against by the bill but I do feel harmed  quiller4   Nov-09-09 01:53 PM   #50 
        - You are correct. No federal money goes to pay for abortions- that is the Hyde Amendment.  wisteria   Nov-09-09 03:12 PM   #63 
        - It makes us worse off than we were before?  treestar   Nov-08-09 10:52 PM   #9 
        - Legislating second class citizenry sets a terrible precedent. And, as has been noted in myriad  bluetrain   Nov-08-09 11:01 PM   #11 
        - That already existed under the Hyde amendment.  Zynx   Nov-08-09 11:16 PM   #14 
           - Stupak's amendment expands Hyde.  bluetrain   Nov-08-09 11:27 PM   #17 
        - Separate but equal is inherently unequal. n/t  Hepburn   Nov-09-09 09:10 AM   #30 
        - it doesn't outlaw abortion. seriously, you'd kill reform over this?  dionysus   Nov-09-09 09:04 AM   #27 
           - You would tear down all those nice schools they built for the AA children under...  Hepburn   Nov-09-09 09:11 AM   #32 
              - thats a bullshit analogy. you really want to kill reform over the coverage of an elective procedure  dionysus   Nov-09-09 09:32 AM   #41 
  - This is a sad episode in DU history.  HughMoran   Nov-08-09 10:33 PM   #3 
  - I think some progressives need to sit on the  rwheeler31   Nov-08-09 10:36 PM   #5 
  - There are ideals and there is pragmatism, but one should not sell one's soul  Beacool   Nov-08-09 10:39 PM   #6 
  - Saving lives IS non-negotiable /nt  demwing   Nov-08-09 10:50 PM   #7 
  - In this case, the "life" being saved is a fetus. n/t  Hepburn   Nov-09-09 09:13 AM   #36 
     - it's not outlawing the procedure. and you know that. and abortions weren't covered before.  dionysus   Nov-09-09 09:34 AM   #43 
        - Agreed, No new law was made, no new restrictions were set  demwing   Nov-09-09 12:39 PM   #48 
  - Unless Hillary runs again right?  Egnever   Nov-09-09 01:48 AM   #19 
  - Of course I would vote for Hillary if she ran again.  Beacool   Nov-09-09 08:25 AM   #22 
     - Assuming for a moment that the amendment stays as is throught the  karynnj   Nov-09-09 09:11 AM   #33 
        - Hillary would be furiously making calls asking for the amendment to be removed.  Beacool   Nov-09-09 09:18 AM   #39 
           - Hillary was as much a triangulator as Bill Clinton  karynnj   Nov-09-09 10:20 AM   #44 
           - You are always so dismissive of Hillary.  Beacool   Nov-09-09 02:28 PM   #58 
              - That was not controversial and it was supported by everyone in the country  karynnj   Nov-09-09 04:34 PM   #67 
           - I doubt that very much. She is a pragmatic politician as is Pelosi  quiller4   Nov-09-09 01:55 PM   #51 
           - Hillary already failed at this. Or don't you recall?  Aramchek   Nov-09-09 02:11 PM   #54 
              - And you think that 1993 was the same as 2009???  Beacool   Nov-09-09 02:17 PM   #55 
                 - it's just funny seeing you tout her as the one who could get things done.  Aramchek   Nov-09-09 02:20 PM   #57 
                    - Frankly, I couldn't care less.  Beacool   Nov-09-09 02:31 PM   #60 
  - I prefer not to let one issue make my voting decisions for me..  RoadRage   Nov-09-09 07:39 AM   #20 
  - No one expected a perfect bill, there is no such animal.  Beacool   Nov-09-09 08:28 AM   #23 
     - You underestimate the first woman Speaker of the House. She only let the amendment be voted on so  jenmito   Nov-09-09 03:40 PM   #65 
  - +1  Hepburn   Nov-09-09 09:12 AM   #35 
  - Stupak will get stripped.  backscatter712   Nov-08-09 11:11 PM   #12 
  - Saying that 3962 is worse than the current health care system is irrational.  Zynx   Nov-08-09 11:14 PM   #13 
  - Yeah, i'm not seeing the logic either..  RoadRage   Nov-08-09 11:26 PM   #15 
  - Thank you for your sane comments  karynnj   Nov-09-09 09:33 AM   #42 
  - Yep.  Kaleva   Nov-09-09 10:50 AM   #45 
  - Well, if thousands more people have to die  prolesunited   Nov-09-09 02:30 PM   #59 
  - How about we pick our battles?  tinrobot   Nov-08-09 11:26 PM   #16 
  - Wasn't that the same excuse used around here when Obama voted on the FISA bill?  Beacool   Nov-09-09 08:24 AM   #21 
     - But now, we all LOVE the FISA bill!  MNDemNY   Nov-09-09 09:03 AM   #26 
        - You're probably right.  Beacool   Nov-09-09 09:11 AM   #31 
           - Sadly.  MNDemNY   Nov-09-09 09:29 AM   #40 
  - Here we go again Dems...shooting ourselves in the foot again.!  demosincebirth   Nov-08-09 11:37 PM   #18 
  - Actually your poll is fucked up.  MNDemNY   Nov-09-09 09:02 AM   #24 
  - Yes, any serious poll should have more than just two false choices.  ThomCat   Nov-09-09 09:07 AM   #28 
     - Yes, we must not question "the one".  MNDemNY   Nov-09-09 09:12 AM   #34 
        - It is really sick how many people here have become EXACTLY  ThomCat   Nov-09-09 09:13 AM   #37 
        - Yup, but we are "haters".  MNDemNY   Nov-09-09 09:17 AM   #38 
        - "the one" ? I prefer plain old President Obama but then that is just me.  Jennicut   Nov-09-09 02:20 PM   #56 
           - whatever works for you.  MNDemNY   Nov-09-09 03:41 PM   #66 
  - The amendment sucks and is horrible to women  Jennicut   Nov-09-09 09:03 AM   #25 
  - Abortion is still legal. It was a covered procedure in few states  quiller4   Nov-09-09 02:04 PM   #52 
  - This poll is unfair. n/t  Hutzpa   Nov-09-09 10:56 AM   #46 
  - The bill is false reform that rewards the criminal behavior of the insurance industry  Sebastian Doyle   Nov-09-09 10:57 AM   #47 
  - And what do you think we could do in the *next year*  prolesunited   Nov-09-09 02:34 PM   #61 
  - What would be better is to take him out in the next primary  depakid   Nov-09-09 01:09 PM   #49 
  - We should just accept and support the Stupak amendment.  PVnRT   Nov-09-09 02:09 PM   #53 
  - I think we need to get a bill passed and then introduce legislation later to revise this.  wisteria   Nov-09-09 03:05 PM   #62 
  - Better than nothing, but not much. This is a real lesson in the process of  old mark   Nov-09-09 03:34 PM   #64 
  - I voted no because don't we realize that we will  marlakay   Nov-09-09 04:45 PM   #68 
  - nicely expressed  Kurt_and_Hunter   Nov-09-09 04:46 PM   #69 
  - "enjoy your crumbs, peons"  optimator   Nov-09-09 05:40 PM   #70 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC