You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #2: No, with a loud "go Carrie Prejean yourself." n/t [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Ineeda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. No, with a loud "go Carrie Prejean yourself." n/t
Edited on Sun Nov-08-09 02:51 PM by Ineeda
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
  -"If I was in Congress my vote on the Stupak ammendment would have been..." Kurt_and_Hunter  Nov-08-09 02:47 PM   #0 
  - No, but I still would have voted for the final bill  sandnsea   Nov-08-09 02:48 PM   #1 
  - Just curious, since the question you raise leap-frogged the other  Kurt_and_Hunter   Nov-08-09 02:53 PM   #3 
  - The amendment sucked ass  sandnsea   Nov-08-09 02:56 PM   #5 
  - Remove the Stupid amendment AND the mandatory insurance company blowjob  Sebastian Doyle   Nov-08-09 02:55 PM   #4 
     - "maybe"  sandnsea   Nov-08-09 02:56 PM   #6 
     - Kick Reid and Pelosi out of their (lack of) Leadership positions and start over  Sebastian Doyle   Nov-08-09 03:00 PM   #8 
     - I wouldn't have voted for a bill w/o mandatory coverage.  quiller4   Nov-08-09 03:14 PM   #12 
        - How can you defend any law that makes it mandatory to pay money to a private corporation  Sebastian Doyle   Nov-08-09 03:22 PM   #16 
  - No, with a loud "go Carrie Prejean yourself." n/t  Ineeda   Nov-08-09 02:50 PM   #2 
  - No (nt)  bigwillq   Nov-08-09 02:57 PM   #7 
  - I'm guessing your "Yes" votes are trolls.  emulatorloo   Nov-08-09 03:03 PM   #9 
  - If admin can really check polls  sandnsea   Nov-08-09 03:10 PM   #10 
  - That's cutting it a little fine...  Kurt_and_Hunter   Nov-08-09 03:21 PM   #15 
  - Nobody supports Stupak  sandnsea   Nov-08-09 03:25 PM   #17 
     - I've been voting for him since '92.  Kaleva   Nov-08-09 10:04 PM   #32 
  - That's terrible.  bigwillq   Nov-08-09 04:18 PM   #23 
  - Pro-lifers are allowed here  Kaleva   Nov-08-09 10:02 PM   #31 
  - No way. It makes the bill bipartisany  Oregone   Nov-08-09 03:12 PM   #11 
     - I don't think any DU'ers give a shit about bipartisanship. At least I have never come across one  emulatorloo   Nov-08-09 03:16 PM   #14 
  - No eom  eleny   Nov-08-09 03:14 PM   #13 
  - No and the amendment should never have been introduced  Hippo_Tron   Nov-08-09 03:46 PM   #18 
  - Heck no!  jenmito   Nov-08-09 03:49 PM   #19 
  - Could at least one yes voter please explain their choice?  Kurt_and_Hunter   Nov-08-09 03:53 PM   #20 
  - Maybe because you spelled amendment wrong.  harun   Nov-08-09 04:04 PM   #21 
     - Ouch!  Kurt_and_Hunter   Nov-08-09 04:26 PM   #27 
  - what specifically does the Stupak ammendment do  grantcart   Nov-08-09 04:14 PM   #22 
  - You cannot buy insurance from a company that provides abortion coverage  IndianaGreen   Nov-08-09 04:20 PM   #24 
  - Is it company or just plan?  Kurt_and_Hunter   Nov-08-09 04:25 PM   #26 
     - If you are in the exchange and getting subsidies, you cannot get any funding  Jennicut   Nov-08-09 04:44 PM   #29 
  - My understanding is that...  Kurt_and_Hunter   Nov-08-09 04:21 PM   #25 
     - put your hair out - we still have a conference committee where the actual puzzle will be put togethe  grantcart   Nov-08-09 05:54 PM   #30 
  - I APOLOGIZE TO ALL FOR SPELLING AMENDMENT WRONG  Kurt_and_Hunter   Nov-08-09 04:29 PM   #28 
  - Depends.  RoadRage   Nov-08-09 10:14 PM   #33 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC