change_notfinetuning
(750 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-05-09 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
| 29. Good question, but there is no doubt about Rahm. The jury is still out on |
|
Obama. Personally, I still have a great deal of hope for him, but it's like a cult. He's surrounded, by his own doing I admit, by negative influences. We need an intervention, or at least some way to ensure that other views reach his ears.
Unfortunately, he has insulated himself just as much as every other president in recent memory. So, good luck!
|
| -Ed Schultz wants Obama to can Rahm Emanuel. |
ej510 |
Nov-05-09 02:22 PM |
#0 |
 -
restrict his duties to whipping up votes in congress and fetching coffee...no choosing candidates or |
yurbud |
Nov-05-09 02:24 PM |
#1 |
| -
you are correct--DUers are going to have to get used to Rahm |
librechik |
Nov-05-09 02:24 PM |
#2 |
 -
Try and get rid of President Obama |
Cha |
Nov-05-09 02:27 PM |
#4 |
| -
haha--I know--that's why I advise everyone to get used to Rahm |
librechik |
Nov-05-09 02:52 PM |
#13 |
 -
They said the same thing about Joe Lieberman....and he won't be elected Dog Catcher ... |
PassingFair |
Nov-06-09 07:07 AM |
#43 |
| -
yeah,the demcrats did so well on tuesday. |
Algorem |
Nov-06-09 07:03 AM |
#42 |
| -
The ones that stuck to their democratic roots did very well indeed. |
ooglymoogly |
Nov-06-09 01:16 PM |
#56 |
| -
BULL HOCKEY |
Peacetrain |
Nov-05-09 02:31 PM |
#8 |
| -
yeah, it would be nice to have an actual liberal as president |
jonnyblitz |
Nov-05-09 02:54 PM |
#16 |
| -
of course--but how long do we keep this up? |
librechik |
Nov-05-09 03:06 PM |
#17 |
| -
yeah, because Obama is behaving just the same as Bush did |
tigereye |
Nov-05-09 05:16 PM |
#34 |
| -
Hey, I'd settle for an actual Democrat. |
Jim Sagle |
Nov-05-09 03:26 PM |
#23 |
| -
+1 nt |
ooglymoogly |
Nov-06-09 01:11 PM |
#55 |
| -
Obama & Rahm: good cop & corporate-owned cop |
yurbud |
Nov-05-09 02:25 PM |
# |
| -
Sometimes it is better to hire people you have |
ej510 |
Nov-05-09 02:28 PM |
#5 |
| -
Obama seems to be very smart and good at playing the long con... |
yurbud |
Nov-05-09 03:18 PM |
#18 |
| -
Yes. n/t |
amandabeech |
Nov-06-09 01:21 PM |
#57 |
| -
Obama & Rahm: corporate-owned cop & corporate-owned cop. |
bvar22 |
Nov-05-09 04:22 PM |
#30 |
| -
ouch! who the fuck would brag about Larry Summers being in the administration? |
yurbud |
Nov-06-09 12:16 AM |
#36 |
| -
+1 |
joeycola |
Nov-06-09 07:31 AM |
#48 |
| -
You mean the new smirking chimp? Check it out - every time he's |
change_notfinetuning |
Nov-06-09 07:42 AM |
#49 |
| -
what the smirk (and his whole face remind me of: |
yurbud |
Nov-07-09 06:38 PM |
#60 |
| -
Obama & Rahm: good cop & corporate-owned cop |
yurbud |
Nov-05-09 02:25 PM |
#3 |
| -
Would that change the way Ed thought about Obama? |
Jennicut |
Nov-05-09 02:30 PM |
#6 |
| -
Everyone wants Summers and Geithner to go. |
ej510 |
Nov-05-09 02:31 PM |
#7 |
| -
Yes, and if Rahm left would anyone who is unhappy with Obama |
Jennicut |
Nov-05-09 02:33 PM |
#10 |
| -
I agree, but getting rid of the corporate dems |
ej510 |
Nov-05-09 02:37 PM |
#12 |
| -
I like Rahm. |
SIMPLYB1980 |
Nov-05-09 02:33 PM |
#9 |
| -
I neither like him nor dislike him. |
Jennicut |
Nov-05-09 02:35 PM |
#11 |
| -
Moderate and Corporatist are not interchangeable terms. nt |
rudy23 |
Nov-05-09 04:46 PM |
#32 |
| -
LOL! |
SIMPLYB1980 |
Nov-05-09 04:48 PM |
#33 |
| -
Well I like Rahm. So I say keep him and I'm a DUer. n/t |
vaberella |
Nov-05-09 02:52 PM |
#14 |
| -
just curious why do you like him ? |
democracy1st |
Nov-06-09 04:11 AM |
#38 |
| -
We all do!!! Good thinking, Ed!!!! nt |
valerief |
Nov-05-09 02:52 PM |
#15 |
| -
Well, George W. Bush eventually canned Karl Rove, |
Cleita |
Nov-05-09 03:19 PM |
#19 |
| -
And I wouldn't mind seeing MSNBC can Ed. So what.? Everyone has an opinion. |
Phx_Dem |
Nov-05-09 03:22 PM |
#20 |
| -
Yeah like that is going to happen but Ed can keep giving all the useless |
Kdillard |
Nov-05-09 03:23 PM |
#21 |
| -
I agree with Ed, Rahm is way too corporate/DLC |
diane in sf |
Nov-05-09 03:25 PM |
#22 |
| -
The sooner the better. n/t |
girl gone mad |
Nov-05-09 03:33 PM |
#24 |
| -
Is Obama less corporate than Rahm, or is Rahm just a scapegoat?? nt |
polichick |
Nov-05-09 03:36 PM |
#25 |
| -
Good question, but there is no doubt about Rahm. The jury is still out on |
change_notfinetuning |
Nov-05-09 04:00 PM |
#29 |
| -
I like your "intervention" idea - we could send the brightest progressives... |
polichick |
Nov-05-09 04:22 PM |
#31 |
| -
No, the jury is not out |
leftynyc |
Nov-06-09 04:25 AM |
#39 |
| -
Can the Rahmpublican. It's a start. |
change_notfinetuning |
Nov-05-09 03:39 PM |
#26 |
| -
Awwww, Bless His Heart |
Dinger |
Nov-05-09 03:40 PM |
#27 |
| -
I want Obama to can Emanuel |
wowimthere |
Nov-05-09 04:00 PM |
#28 |
| -
Good for Shultz. Recommended. |
Vidar |
Nov-06-09 12:01 AM |
#35 |
| -
Chiefs of staff often have short tenures |
depakid |
Nov-06-09 12:51 AM |
#37 |
| -
Does the President care what Liberals think? |
lovelyrita |
Nov-06-09 05:15 AM |
#40 |
| -
No he just doesn't care to listen to fools |
SIMPLYB1980 |
Nov-06-09 07:24 AM |
#46 |
| -
Fools?! |
lovelyrita |
Nov-06-09 10:22 AM |
#51 |
| -
They're DLC talking points. Except they mostly say them behind closed doors. nt |
rudy23 |
Nov-06-09 01:45 PM |
#59 |
| -
No! |
ej510 |
Nov-06-09 07:24 AM |
#47 |
| -
Obama's the one in charge.He needs primary opponents. |
Algorem |
Nov-06-09 06:59 AM |
#41 |
| -
I agree, but he won't get one. |
ej510 |
Nov-06-09 07:19 AM |
#44 |
| -
It seems Rahm is giving the POTUS terrible advice. |
Vinca |
Nov-06-09 07:20 AM |
#45 |
| -
Canning Rahm whould be a great service to this country. His self serving greed |
mod mom |
Nov-06-09 10:02 AM |
#50 |
| -
Ed Schultz is a loudmouthed, windbag |
Aramchek |
Nov-06-09 11:26 AM |
#52 |
| -
Emanuel was THE first guy the prez chose. He likes him and Emanuel does what he wants done. nt |
Captain Hilts |
Nov-06-09 11:58 AM |
#53 |
| -
Rahm, Goldman Sachs and Wall Street - a cozy group |
SandWalker1984 |
Nov-06-09 12:01 PM |
#54 |
| -
Didn't Clinton demote Rahm, who then eventually left? n/t |
amandabeech |
Nov-06-09 01:24 PM |
#58 |
| -
I don't because I don't know the conversations they have and it is President Obama's |
ncteechur |
Nov-07-09 08:33 PM |
#61 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread