Reply #24: hee hee

[WeDidIt]

"The
question
is
not
one
of
precedent,
the
question
is
whether
politics
dictate
the
outcome
in
many
or
most
Obama‐related
cases,
where
avoiding
discovery
and
fact‐finding
is
the
primary
(and
outcome‐determinative)
goal.

Plaintiff
submits
that
if
discovery
is
ever
allowed
in
this
case,
it
will
be
rapidly
settled
by
the
resignation
or
impeachment
of
the
President.

If
the
stone
wall
of
secrecy
and
suppression
is
ever
removed,
if
California
sunshine
is
ever
allowed
to
shine
for
one
day
on
the
real
evidence,
the
Presidency
of
Barack
Hussein
Obama
will
be
rapidly
brought
to
a
rather
embarrassing
close,
and
the
Defendants’
counsel
know
it,
just
as
Judges
Land
and
Lazzara
know
it
in
Georgia
and
Florida.

Secrecy
and
refusal
to
divulge
information
can
have
only
one
possible
purpose:
to
hide
an
inconvenient
truth.

Everywhere
the
Plaintiffs
or
their
counsel
have
gone,
they
have
been
met
with
resistance,
which
can
only
be
described
as
irrational
if
there
were
nothing
to
hide."

:rofl: