You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #21: That sounds right [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Shrek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-19-04 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. That sounds right
Here's another snip from the same article:

Half an hour later, Roberts called "60 Minutes" producer Mary Mapes with word that Bartlett was not challenging the authenticity of the documents. Mapes told her bosses, who were so relieved that they cut from Rather's story an interview with a handwriting expert who had examined the memos.

At that point, said "60 Minutes" executive Josh Howard, "we completely abandoned the process of authenticating the documents. Obviously, looking back on it, that was a mistake. We stopped questioning ourselves. I suppose you could say we let our guard down."


Sounds like maybe the White House just got lucky. They didn't challenge the documents because they knew the contents to be true, but they got the benefit of some sloppiness on the part of CBS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Something I don't understand about the Dan Rather/CBS story ?? kentuck  Sep-19-04 01:51 PM   #0 
  - That thought keeps echoing in my head too!  liberalnurse   Sep-19-04 01:53 PM   #1 
  - good point!  grasswire   Sep-19-04 01:53 PM   #2 
  - because you have only heard that story ONCE  nadinbrzezinski   Sep-19-04 01:53 PM   #3 
  - Washington Post finally explained it this morning  DoubleDigitIQ   Sep-19-04 01:57 PM   #4 
  - Why would you verify such damning evidence then??  kentuck   Sep-19-04 02:06 PM   #7 
  - Probably didn't think "more time" would help  DoubleDigitIQ   Sep-19-04 02:16 PM   #10 
     - But by not challenging, they validate them....  kentuck   Sep-19-04 02:19 PM   #11 
        - But that made it a no-lose for the White House  DoubleDigitIQ   Sep-19-04 02:30 PM   #14 
        - But they did explicitly authenticate them....  kentuck   Sep-19-04 02:33 PM   #16 
           - Okay, I didn't know that  DoubleDigitIQ   Sep-19-04 02:40 PM   #19 
              - Maybe a matter of interpretation?  kentuck   Sep-19-04 02:46 PM   #20 
                 - That sounds right  DoubleDigitIQ   Sep-19-04 02:59 PM   #21 
        - Nothing stopped the WH from disputing the facts...  LiberalFighter   Sep-19-04 03:47 PM   #23 
           - Exactly !  kentuck   Sep-19-04 03:51 PM   #24 
           - But what could they say?  DoubleDigitIQ   Sep-19-04 04:53 PM   #25 
  - Hmmm- doesn't stop them from discrediting every other critical story about  mbali   Sep-19-04 02:33 PM   #15 
  - If Bartlett couldn't verify the docs in 3 hours,  Jackpine Radical   Sep-19-04 02:36 PM   #18 
  - from my paper (stpete times) FL  bluedog   Sep-19-04 01:58 PM   #5 
  - I think CBS was had by Barlett.  Longhorn   Sep-19-04 02:03 PM   #6 
  - I agree  Jonathan Little   Sep-19-04 02:20 PM   #12 
  - The thing that drives me nuts....  Jade Fox   Sep-19-04 02:08 PM   #8 
  - As long as it is good for bussiness  nadinbrzezinski   Sep-19-04 02:10 PM   #9 
  - Bartlett bs'd Rather  DoYouEverWonder   Sep-19-04 02:22 PM   #13 
  - It's a subtle threat from the Rethugs. CBS needs to do nothing. If they do  dieharderdem   Sep-19-04 02:36 PM   #17 
  - It called a Set-Up......CBS (the liberal media) had it in for bush*  spanone   Sep-19-04 03:04 PM   #22 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC