slipslidingaway
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-16-09 01:18 PM
Response to Original message |
| 5. Now this thread is being unrecommended without one comment |
|
as to why they feel the analysis is flawed.
|
| -Senate HELP 'public option' will be multiple 'options' run by insurance companies |
IndianaGreen |
Aug-16-09 01:00 PM |
#0 |
-
knr - maybe edit the OP to include the permanent link, see below... |
slipslidingaway |
Aug-16-09 01:07 PM |
#1 |
 -
Thank you, slipslidingaway, I will do so |
IndianaGreen |
Aug-16-09 01:09 PM |
#3 |
-
You're welcome... |
slipslidingaway |
Aug-16-09 01:16 PM |
#4 |
-
Thanks for the info |
IndianaGreen |
Aug-16-09 01:21 PM |
#7 |
-
And thank you, if too many people feel betrayed by this reform |
slipslidingaway |
Aug-16-09 01:26 PM |
#12 |
-
rec# 3 n/t |
slipslidingaway |
Aug-16-09 01:07 PM |
#2 |
-
Now this thread is being unrecommended without one comment |
slipslidingaway |
Aug-16-09 01:18 PM |
#5 |
 -
The unrec squad doesn't care about facts |
IndianaGreen |
Aug-16-09 01:24 PM |
#9 |
-
It is a great tool for shutting down dissenting views, I wish this |
slipslidingaway |
Aug-16-09 01:31 PM |
#13 |
-
Good grief |
ProSense |
Aug-16-09 01:18 PM |
#6 |
 -
And your interpretation of Section 3106 is ??? ... |
slipslidingaway |
Aug-16-09 01:24 PM |
#10 |
  -
She doesn't want to talk about it |
IndianaGreen |
Aug-16-09 02:25 PM |
#15 |
   -
Oh well, better just repeat that the public option is robust and strong. n/t |
slipslidingaway |
Aug-16-09 07:54 PM |
#17 |
  -
The public option is strong. Pnhp is confused. n/t |
ProSense |
Aug-16-09 09:13 PM |
#23 |
  -
The current public option is a mere shell of the original proposal... |
slipslidingaway |
Aug-16-09 10:22 PM |
#24 |
  -
The public option is weak, you are confused. nt. |
ipaint |
Aug-16-09 10:32 PM |
#27 |
  -
Pnhp: "Because it is poorly written, it requires at least two readings to understand it." |
ProSense |
Aug-16-09 09:11 PM |
#22 |
   -
Obviously you are much smarter because you support the current |
slipslidingaway |
Aug-16-09 10:28 PM |
#25 |
   -
No you didn't. |
ipaint |
Aug-16-09 10:31 PM |
#26 |
  -
My interpretation of this editorial is that it was written by a man with an agenda |
demwing |
Aug-16-09 10:39 PM |
#29 |
 -
What other interpretations have you read, many people are |
slipslidingaway |
Aug-16-09 11:47 PM |
#31 |
 -
Medicare Advantage programs are run by? Oh yeah, private insurance corporations. |
nightrain |
Aug-16-09 08:43 PM |
#18 |
-
You know, single-payer would simopify things and be significantly cheaper |
quantass |
Aug-16-09 01:22 PM |
#8 |
 -
A real public option would be giving people the right to opt for Medicare |
IndianaGreen |
Aug-16-09 01:25 PM |
#11 |
-
knr. Let's keep this kicked! |
nightrain |
Aug-16-09 02:24 PM |
#14 |
-
kick n/t |
slipslidingaway |
Aug-16-09 06:41 PM |
#16 |
-
K&R |
billyoc |
Aug-16-09 08:46 PM |
#19 |
-
The public option needs to be exactly THAT. The PUBLIC option. |
Sebastian Doyle |
Aug-16-09 08:49 PM |
#20 |
-
Without the public option the entire thing should just be scrapped... |
S_E_Fudd |
Aug-16-09 08:56 PM |
#21 |
-
This post died as a subthread, so you promoted it, eh? |
demwing |
Aug-16-09 10:33 PM |
#28 |
 -
The post did not die as a subthread, check the times on the |
slipslidingaway |
Aug-16-09 11:27 PM |
#30 |
-
Yes, we know it passed, but did it pass wirthout changes? |
demwing |
Aug-17-09 06:38 AM |
#34 |
-
He is analyzing the only HELP bill there is to analyze! Does Dean have |
slipslidingaway |
Aug-17-09 09:45 AM |
#35 |
-
K&R |
leftstreet |
Aug-17-09 01:49 AM |
#32 |
-
Private companies administer much, maybe even most of government plans |
TheKentuckian |
Aug-17-09 02:55 AM |
#33 |