You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #13: Is there anything on that site but [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Is there anything on that site but
"scientists hope to find a link between cancer and nuclear power plants in location X, but haven't yet done so?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Pronuke or No Nuke? Obama must decide. What do you say? $50 Billion for nukes? Yes or no? Liberation Angel  Jul-11-09 01:49 AM   #0 
  - Welcome to General Discussion: Nukes. nt  masuki bance   Jul-11-09 01:54 AM   #1 
  - Obama has to make a decision on this soon so GD: Presidential is where this belongs  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 11:41 AM   #58 
  - NO NUKES: Bruce Springsteen, Gil Scott Heron, Crosby Still and Nash (Link)  Liberation Angel   Jul-18-09 07:53 PM   #233 
  - NO NUKES WIKIPEDIA Page (link to No Nukes Concert by MUSE)  Liberation Angel   Jul-19-09 03:12 PM   #240 
  - www.nonukes.org another informational site  Liberation Angel   Jul-20-09 06:57 AM   #251 
  - Please state your reasons  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 02:00 AM   #2 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jul-11-09 02:50 AM   #3 
  - thanks for the delete!  Liberation Angel   Jul-16-09 11:36 PM   #227 
  - You'll be surprised to know that I rec'd this thread  scheming daemons   Jul-11-09 03:43 AM   #4 
  - Fair enough  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 09:21 AM   #7 
  - What Nukes are you talking about?  RC   Jul-11-09 05:36 AM   #5 
  - Nuclear power, where I lived (i.e. near a nuke plant) is how I mean it  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 09:24 AM   #8 
     - and I lived up the highway from Hanford and 'nukes' always meant bombs  grantcart   Jul-11-09 05:57 PM   #113 
        - The "No Nukes" Concerts were emblematic anti nuke power events in NYC and were HUGE  Liberation Angel   Jul-18-09 07:49 PM   #232 
  - Nuclear Power is the height of human arrogance  Tom Rinaldo   Jul-11-09 07:26 AM   #6 
  - You make some very compelling points: MOST people know little about this  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 09:34 AM   #9 
  - My problem with nukes is not only the danger of meltdown.  wroberts189   Jul-11-09 10:26 PM   #121 
  - woops..meant to reply to main thread sorry. nt  wroberts189   Jul-11-09 10:27 PM   #123 
     - no probs - good points  Liberation Angel   Jul-19-09 10:03 AM   #237 
  - Here is an example of how oversight of the nuclear power industry works  Tom Rinaldo   Jul-11-09 10:01 AM   #19 
  - Here is another...  Tom Rinaldo   Jul-11-09 10:05 AM   #21 
     - Isn't that a bit like saying, "the TSA sucks, so we shouldn't use airplanes?" nt  Occam Bandage   Jul-11-09 10:07 AM   #22 
     - No, not at all  Tom Rinaldo   Jul-11-09 10:25 AM   #27 
        - "There is insufficient oversight" is not the same statement as "oversight doesn't work."  Occam Bandage   Jul-11-09 11:09 AM   #38 
           - pretty much defines itself  Liberation Angel   Jul-18-09 04:23 PM   #230 
     - Sleeping armed guards in the "ready room"....  Liberation Angel   Jul-18-09 09:39 PM   #235 
  - Great post  Sugarcoated   Jul-11-09 11:16 AM   #44 
  - I wonder how many pro-nuke people here would live close to one. nt  wroberts189   Jul-11-09 10:32 PM   #124 
     - No kidding (or swim in water downstream)  Liberation Angel   Jul-13-09 10:51 PM   #190 
  - Wow ..excellent post. nt  wroberts189   Jul-11-09 10:23 PM   #120 
     - everyone who supports nukes should read this  Liberation Angel   Jul-22-09 12:41 PM   #261 
  - I support safe, clean nuclear energy as a necessary transition from coal to renewables. nt  Occam Bandage   Jul-11-09 09:41 AM   #10 
  - There is no safe, clean nuclear energy, that is a myth...and as for transtion  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 09:51 AM   #14 
  - It's funny that you think "clean coal" exists, and then babble about myths. nt  Occam Bandage   Jul-11-09 09:51 AM   #15 
     - I did NOT say clean coal exists so stop saying that. I oppose coal too.  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 09:55 AM   #17 
        - Okay, so we'll strike that "unless it can be made clean." It can't, that's coal propaganda.  Occam Bandage   Jul-11-09 10:03 AM   #20 
           - I believe it COULD be but agree that is probably not a good alternative  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 10:11 AM   #24 
              - My neighbor has a dental practice in a town right next to Limerick  Sugarcoated   Jul-11-09 11:24 AM   #49 
                 - Check out the teeth studies at ww.radiation.org  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 11:39 AM   #57 
                    - We live about 30 miles from the Limerick plant  Sugarcoated   Jul-11-09 11:52 AM   #62 
                    - I'm afraid not but the further the better, but it is complicated by other factors  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 01:15 PM   #81 
                    - Here's one on the amount of radiation (Strontium 90) in baby teeth  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 01:19 PM   #83 
                       - How in the world can anyone thinks that this is okay?  Sugarcoated   Jul-11-09 01:43 PM   #87 
                          - Malthusians, First Worlders, America Firsters, Population alarmists  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 02:50 PM   #90 
                             - So, in other words, selfish greedy heartless mofos  Sugarcoated   Jul-11-09 03:25 PM   #98 
                                - Don't be surprised if it is only a small minority  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 03:57 PM   #102 
  - I am as well, it is the waste I have an issue with...  and-justice-for-all   Jul-11-09 11:31 PM   #127 
  - Compared to the constant damage inflicted by most other sources of power, nukes are a small  Zynx   Jul-11-09 09:43 AM   #11 
  - You are not well informed  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 09:47 AM   #12 
     - Is there anything on that site but  Occam Bandage   Jul-11-09 09:51 AM   #13 
        - Sure there is. Read the studies (peer reviewed)  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 09:53 AM   #16 
           - I don't see any studies on that site. Could you link them?  Occam Bandage   Jul-11-09 09:58 AM   #18 
              - Here's one link on childhood leukemia near plants  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 10:19 AM   #26 
              - That's a letter to the editor saying,  Occam Bandage   Jul-11-09 11:02 AM   #35 
              - One study on cancer rates near NYC at Indian Point  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 10:25 AM   #28 
                 - How is that proving a link between the nuclear plant and cancer?  high density   Jul-11-09 10:44 AM   #32 
                 - The epidemiological studies are overwhelming in establishing a correlation an  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 11:14 AM   #41 
                    - If they're overwhelming, why don't you have published studies demonstrating the correlation? nt  Occam Bandage   Jul-11-09 11:15 AM   #43 
                       - Okay here's another studyWHY CANCER RATES IN THE HAMPTONS ARE SO HIG  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 01:03 PM   #79 
                 - That's a report saying that there seems to be more cancer at one particular location.  Occam Bandage   Jul-11-09 11:04 AM   #36 
                    - Actually that is exactly what these studies are working on and establishing  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 11:18 AM   #45 
                       - Yes. Working on and establishing. "Scientists hope to find" is not "scientists have found."  Occam Bandage   Jul-11-09 11:19 AM   #46 
                          - They HAVE done the studies and they HAVE found the correlation.  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 11:33 AM   #52 
                             - So give us the studies in which they demonstrate any causality. nt  Occam Bandage   Jul-11-09 11:56 AM   #64 
                                - If you read their journal the studies are there  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 01:16 PM   #82 
                                   - The journal links have the studies on how we are ALL irradiated from nuke reactors and tests  Liberation Angel   Jul-22-09 03:28 PM   #262 
  - Pro nukes. Hey, dude...that IS renewable energy, if done the way the French do it.  Honeycombe8   Jul-11-09 10:08 AM   #23 
  - It is NOT clean: That is the big lie. and the French are having major problems with theirs  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 10:13 AM   #25 
     - Does "exporting 18% of their energy production" constitute a major problem in your book?  Occam Bandage   Jul-11-09 11:14 AM   #42 
     - You are wrong on that right now. See post 51 below  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 11:43 AM   #59 
        - The carbon used for transporting waste is negligible.  Occam Bandage   Jul-11-09 12:00 PM   #68 
           - Not really negligible and no comparison at all to wind power: ridiculous  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 02:53 PM   #91 
     - So they import some energy. Like we don't? We import MOST of ours.  Honeycombe8   Jul-11-09 07:59 PM   #116 
  - Another study on infant mortality (deaths) after nuclear plant startups  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 10:38 AM   #29 
  - That's in America not the rest of the planet, the French do it the safe way  uponit7771   Jul-11-09 10:40 AM   #30 
     - Perhaps well intentioned sane French do so better than well intentioned sane Americans  Tom Rinaldo   Jul-11-09 10:48 AM   #33 
     - The French are IMPORTING energy right now due to failures in their nuke systems  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 11:05 AM   #37 
        - France is currently the world's largest net exporter of electricity.  Occam Bandage   Jul-11-09 11:11 AM   #39 
           - See my post below # 51, Right now you are wrong  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 11:37 AM   #55 
              - Last week, sure. It's hot. Given that the heatwave is over, I'm sure EDF will remain positive  Occam Bandage   Jul-11-09 11:58 AM   #66 
                 - Once again your claim that all is well with France's nukes is wrong  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 12:03 PM   #70 
                    - Why? Your claim that they were importing turned out to be insignificant.  Occam Bandage   Jul-11-09 12:08 PM   #74 
                    - Given that our coal plants are belching waste of all sorts....  Milspec   Jul-11-09 08:14 PM   #117 
                    - It's become the usual DU bickerfest  Sugarcoated   Jul-11-09 12:13 PM   #76 
                       - Posting that in a subthread where  Occam Bandage   Jul-11-09 12:41 PM   #78 
                          - You claim my data is absolutely false? And where's data saying radiation is SAFE for children  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 03:02 PM   #93 
                             - You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.  boppers   Jul-11-09 07:22 PM   #115 
                                - which word?  Liberation Angel   Jul-12-09 03:16 AM   #138 
                                   - Radiation.  boppers   Jul-12-09 03:30 PM   #157 
  - The science for safe nuke energy exist and has been proven. To ignore it is to be anti science...  uponit7771   Jul-11-09 10:42 AM   #31 
  - That is patently false, as for the French --- read this report  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 11:01 AM   #34 
     - The French are a net energy EXPORTER, which your report happens to ignore. Ditch the propaganda. nt  Occam Bandage   Jul-11-09 11:12 AM   #40 
        - Not right now. 1/3 of their plants are closed and they are IMPORTING  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 11:19 AM   #47 
           - Right now France exports 7GWh/mo and imports 2.5. (May 2009 figures)  Occam Bandage   Jul-11-09 11:21 AM   #48 
              - The OP will just claim that report is cooked... you can't win with a zealot who ignores facts  scheming daemons   Jul-11-09 11:28 AM   #50 
                 - See the Facts in my post # 51 FRANCE IMPORTING ENERGY/PLANTS SHUTDOWN  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 11:34 AM   #53 
                    - The facts related to one week of energy import? Compare that to the facts of  Occam Bandage   Jul-11-09 11:59 AM   #67 
                       - www.nirs.org has the real deal on France's "safe.cheap" nukes (not)  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 12:05 PM   #72 
  - The London Times 7/4/2009 France Importing Energy as 1/3 of nuke plants shut down  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 11:29 AM   #51 
  - Yes, France imports energy. And it exports more than it imports yearly.  Occam Bandage   Jul-11-09 11:56 AM   #63 
     - If you think shutting down due to overheating is not a "problem"  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 12:01 PM   #69 
        - The plants weren't overheating.  Occam Bandage   Jul-11-09 12:04 PM   #71 
           - They shut them down to prevent them from overheating  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 03:41 PM   #100 
              - We dont' need "perfect" when it comes to nuke power just when it comes to thier safety and that done  uponit7771   Jul-13-09 10:30 AM   #182 
  - Just put them places we dont care about  Oregone   Jul-11-09 11:35 AM   #54 
  - Like NYC or Miami  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 11:37 AM   #56 
  - After reading all the posts here, I now understand why the OP said 'nukes'  RC   Jul-11-09 11:44 AM   #60 
  - Because I grew up in a community full of "nukes" which referred to the power plants  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 11:58 AM   #65 
  - ...  Sugarcoated   Jul-11-09 01:52 PM   #89 
     - It is absolutely disgraceful and 1 scientist called for nuremburg type trials  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 03:13 PM   #96 
  - Subtle as a brick, eh?...nt  SidDithers   Jul-11-09 01:29 PM   #85 
  - The BIG LIE that nukes are "Green" or zero carbon emission: report  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 11:45 AM   #61 
  - France's Reactor problems: greenpeace study  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 12:06 PM   #73 
  - That's a laughable attempt at propaganda.  Occam Bandage   Jul-11-09 12:11 PM   #75 
     - Greenpeace is a reliable source and has world class scientists who care about humanity  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 03:06 PM   #94 
  - Angel  Sugarcoated   Jul-11-09 12:25 PM   #77 
  - Why Cancer Rates in the Hamptons are So High: report  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 01:10 PM   #80 
  - This is so fucking wrong.  Sugarcoated   Jul-11-09 01:32 PM   #86 
     - If you read the studies and reports at the "Journal" link at www.radiation.org  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 03:10 PM   #95 
        - Thanks for devoting time to this  Sugarcoated   Jul-11-09 03:21 PM   #97 
           - This is a very important issue to me: my two children were diagnosed with radiation related illness  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 04:07 PM   #103 
              - Seems no pro nuclear posters want to deal with those facts  Sugarcoated   Jul-12-09 05:00 PM   #161 
                 - Thanks - that's for sure based on this survey  Liberation Angel   Jul-13-09 07:31 AM   #168 
  - I support nuclear energy...  SidDithers   Jul-11-09 01:23 PM   #84 
  - Strong supporter here. n/t  cherokeeprogressive   Jul-11-09 01:49 PM   #88 
  - C'mon prosolar anti-nuclear green folks. PLEASE vote PRONUKES WINNING!  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 02:56 PM   #92 
  - More importantly  Sugarcoated   Jul-11-09 03:37 PM   #99 
  - As I said in the OP, the pronuke republicans and dems are holding the energy bill hostage  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 03:44 PM   #101 
  - Gave a rec for more exposure and because the thread was  slipslidingaway   Jul-11-09 10:34 PM   #126 
  - Awww, taking your ball and going home now that your team is losing?  NeedleCast   Jul-15-09 05:12 PM   #211 
     - not just yet --- ninth inning and maybe overtime  Liberation Angel   Jul-20-09 07:32 AM   #254 
  - Nuclear power > Coal power  PolNewf   Jul-11-09 04:08 PM   #104 
  - Neither is necessary but coal is safer than mutagenic and carcinogenic nukes  Liberation Angel   Jul-16-09 08:40 AM   #221 
  - Out of 100,000+ Duers only 36 oppose nuclear subsidies and power?  Liberation Angel   Jul-11-09 04:09 PM   #105 
  - If you only wanted one side  spoony   Jul-11-09 04:37 PM   #106 
  - This isn't some Side X or Side Y issue. It's much more complicated...  Fearless   Jul-11-09 04:50 PM   #107 
  - well thanks for weighing in  Liberation Angel   Jul-12-09 03:02 AM   #135 
     - My statement was that there should be more than two options  Fearless   Jul-12-09 04:21 PM   #160 
        - t I wanted to see whether people supported the $50 BILLION for Nukes Obama my support  Liberation Angel   Jul-14-09 05:01 PM   #197 
  - K&R. Science should be common knowledge in our society,  boppers   Jul-11-09 04:53 PM   #108 
  - Hi, Liberation Angel  mvd   Jul-11-09 05:24 PM   #109 
  - Pebble beds seem to be much better than rods...  boppers   Jul-11-09 05:30 PM   #110 
     - Cooling towers  mvd   Jul-11-09 05:33 PM   #111 
        - One idea I saw floated a bit back was building *inside* of mountains.  boppers   Jul-11-09 05:51 PM   #112 
           - Hope that can be explored further  mvd   Jul-11-09 07:01 PM   #114 
              - Why?  Liberation Angel   Jul-12-09 03:18 AM   #139 
                 - I said in my first post that I don't think it's safe enough  mvd   Jul-12-09 08:04 AM   #144 
                 - LOL! Gotta love THAT loaded question...  eqfan592   Jul-15-09 03:50 PM   #206 
                    - How does being opposed to nuclear subsidies and new plants make me a FREEPER?  Liberation Angel   Jul-16-09 08:36 AM   #220 
  - 62% for isotopes, 36% against isotopes.  boppers   Jul-11-09 09:56 PM   #118 
  - really sad about this  Liberation Angel   Jul-12-09 09:27 AM   #146 
  - Recd ..invest in solar and cold fusion... and batteries. nt  wroberts189   Jul-11-09 10:20 PM   #119 
  - Im generally opposed, but I like Pebble bed reactors. Radioactivity is contained in a graphite shell  DRoseDARs   Jul-11-09 10:27 PM   #122 
  - Yes. Lots of jobs are created building and running nuke plants.  MrSlayer   Jul-11-09 10:33 PM   #125 
  - That's a bunch of baloney.  avaistheone1   Jul-12-09 12:11 AM   #130 
  - You'd be correct if it weren't for the fact that you're wrong.  DRoseDARs   Jul-12-09 12:18 AM   #131 
  - No, it isn't.  MrSlayer   Jul-12-09 08:35 PM   #164 
  - These jobs are deadly and dangerous, when the plants are online  Liberation Angel   Jul-13-09 08:23 AM   #174 
  - Clean and safe nuclear power yes, warheads...NO..nt  and-justice-for-all   Jul-11-09 11:34 PM   #128 
  - There is no such thing as clean and safe nuclear power.  avaistheone1   Jul-11-09 11:41 PM   #129 
     - Sorry, but there can be safe and clean nuclear power...  and-justice-for-all   Jul-12-09 12:38 AM   #132 
        - +the emissions do not make us sick?  Liberation Angel   Jul-12-09 02:42 AM   #133 
           - Uh, those are cooling towers...not toxic gases  and-justice-for-all   Jul-12-09 04:35 AM   #143 
              - Why are radiation emissions from nuke plants NOT toxic gases?  Liberation Angel   Jul-12-09 09:54 AM   #152 
              - Buh bye...nt  and-justice-for-all   Jul-12-09 05:58 PM   #162 
                 - vaya con dios  Liberation Angel   Jul-14-09 12:18 AM   #193 
              - Higher cancer rates around nuclear plants  Sugarcoated   Jul-12-09 09:59 AM   #153 
  - People put on your thinking caps. $$$ for NUKES or $$$ for solar  Liberation Angel   Jul-12-09 02:50 AM   #134 
  - No they just do not understand the dangers involved. nt  wroberts189   Jul-12-09 03:18 AM   #140 
     - so its ignorance?  Liberation Angel   Jul-12-09 09:45 AM   #150 
        - There was an article in Science magazine I believe...  wroberts189   Jul-12-09 03:03 PM   #156 
           - Yeah its scary. One good natural disaster or terrorists could make a hell on earth  Liberation Angel   Jul-13-09 08:04 AM   #172 
  - I'm ambivalent. I think that nuclear energy is viable and the challenges could be met.  ChimpersMcSmirkers   Jul-12-09 03:08 AM   #136 
  - Exactly! Meh!  Liberation Angel   Jul-12-09 03:14 AM   #137 
  - How about we all listen to Al Gore..  wroberts189   Jul-12-09 03:19 AM   #141 
  - absolutemente!  Liberation Angel   Jul-12-09 09:41 AM   #149 
  - Here is some valuable information - nuclear is 3rd tier technology for carbon  kristopher   Jul-12-09 03:56 AM   #142 
  - good analysis except...  Liberation Angel   Jul-12-09 09:33 AM   #147 
  - No. Too expensive too inefficient keeps control of our power supply in too few hands  Greyhound   Jul-12-09 09:16 AM   #145 
  - thanks greyhound  Liberation Angel   Jul-12-09 09:39 AM   #148 
     - You're welcome,  Greyhound   Jul-12-09 03:34 PM   #158 
        - cool and thanks  Liberation Angel   Jul-13-09 09:08 PM   #188 
  - What about higher cancer rates in the surrounding areas of  Sugarcoated   Jul-12-09 09:51 AM   #151 
  - MIT study on Radioactive emissions from nuke plants (Proof positive)  Liberation Angel   Jul-12-09 10:16 AM   #154 
  - Measuring in Curies, not differentiating between harmful and harmless...  boppers   Jul-12-09 03:59 PM   #159 
  - Pronukes are still winning but still no greatest page/unrec wins  Liberation Angel   Jul-12-09 10:18 AM   #155 
  - A kick  Sugarcoated   Jul-12-09 06:58 PM   #163 
  - No - to the ultimate gamble. In Waste we trust? That might be a more fitting motto for humanity.  Sunnyshine   Jul-13-09 03:03 AM   #165 
  - The wastes are dangerous for 250,000 years. All recorded History is only 5000 years  Liberation Angel   Jul-13-09 08:26 AM   #175 
     - Yup. It is crazy. Nuclear and Fossil fuels are both unacceptable risks. They are killing us .  Sunnyshine   Jul-13-09 12:57 PM   #184 
  - Nuclear power plants attract giant monsters.  ZombieHorde   Jul-13-09 04:01 AM   #166 
  - Terrorists, corporofascists, mad scientists, baby mutations  Liberation Angel   Jul-13-09 07:36 AM   #170 
  - James Lovelock on the subject  RBitt   Jul-13-09 05:42 AM   #167 
  - Lester Brown (from your link) on "The Flawed Economics of Nuclear Power"  Liberation Angel   Jul-13-09 07:35 AM   #169 
  - Lovelock also says environmentalism is becoming fascism and renewables are imaginary  Liberation Angel   Jul-13-09 07:55 AM   #171 
  - The power of the unrec button - STILL no greatest page  Liberation Angel   Jul-13-09 08:10 AM   #173 
  - I guess that won't stop you from selfishly kicking yourself to the top for a few more days.  high density   Jul-13-09 08:27 AM   #176 
     - The only way to et a fair poll is to keep it visible  Liberation Angel   Jul-13-09 08:41 AM   #178 
     - Kick  harun   Jul-13-09 09:32 PM   #189 
        - Thanks harun - the rec unrec button is locked now but the poll can still live  Liberation Angel   Jul-13-09 10:52 PM   #191 
           - Yes it can!  harun   Jul-14-09 07:41 AM   #195 
              - Indeedy  Liberation Angel   Jul-14-09 04:58 PM   #196 
  - 71 Pronuke? Really? C'mon Duers. Show the real deal.  Liberation Angel   Jul-13-09 08:39 AM   #177 
  - Keep getting your friends signed up at DU until you get the result you want....  scheming daemons   Jul-13-09 09:12 AM   #180 
     - It's my understanding that one can't vote in a poll  Sugarcoated   Jul-13-09 10:52 AM   #183 
        - And that is why we can win this  Liberation Angel   Jul-13-09 07:08 PM   #186 
  - If they can't be trusted to get a loan without a government guarantee  rug   Jul-13-09 08:45 AM   #179 
  - the nuke industry, like all Big Energy, cannot be trusted  Liberation Angel   Jul-13-09 10:19 AM   #181 
  - Worst radiation releases in US history: Church Rock, New Mexico 90 MILLION Gallons of radioactive..  Liberation Angel   Jul-13-09 07:05 PM   #185 
  - Kick  Sugarcoated   Jul-13-09 09:06 PM   #187 
  - Thanks sugar!  Liberation Angel   Jul-13-09 10:54 PM   #192 
  - Kick for Tuesday DUers  Liberation Angel   Jul-14-09 06:58 AM   #194 
  - Please vote and weigh in before this poll is closed  Liberation Angel   Jul-14-09 05:04 PM   #198 
  - I put strontium 90 on my corn flakes. I love isotopes!  midnight armadillo   Jul-14-09 09:18 PM   #199 
  - According to these estimates of the European Committee on Radiation Risk - 1 million dead per year  Liberation Angel   Jul-15-09 12:19 AM   #200 
  - 83 pronukes, 65 no nukes, 5 dunnos, and 3 recs  Liberation Angel   Jul-15-09 08:40 AM   #201 
  - Last chance to vote  Liberation Angel   Jul-15-09 12:46 PM   #202 
  - 85 pronukes 65 nonukes 5 dunnos 3 recs  Liberation Angel   Jul-15-09 01:55 PM   #203 
     - Yeah, we can read the poll too. Too bad you can't deal with the fact that most people AREN'T buying  DRoseDARs   Jul-15-09 02:33 PM   #204 
        - if anything you said was less than tragic hyperbole and excuses  Liberation Angel   Jul-15-09 03:28 PM   #205 
        - Higher cancer rates in folks who live near nuclear plower plants  Sugarcoated   Jul-15-09 04:36 PM   #209 
        - +1...  SidDithers   Jul-16-09 08:36 AM   #219 
  - no nukes is good nukes.  Soylent Brice   Jul-15-09 04:07 PM   #207 
  - until we find a realistic way do cope with the waste- we shouldn't  Bluerthanblue   Jul-15-09 04:29 PM   #208 
  - Exactly  Sugarcoated   Jul-15-09 05:16 PM   #212 
  - I'm with you. nt  JerseygirlCT   Jul-15-09 06:30 PM   #215 
  - Cleverly worded Poll  NeedleCast   Jul-15-09 04:50 PM   #210 
  - read the question  Liberation Angel   Jul-15-09 06:08 PM   #213 
  - Until they've figured out how to safely dispose of nuke waste  JerseygirlCT   Jul-15-09 06:28 PM   #214 
  - thanks jerseygirl - they will never figure that out  Liberation Angel   Jul-15-09 11:57 PM   #216 
  - No  mp9200   Jul-16-09 04:33 AM   #217 
  - Thanks, mp9200 we are gaining here  Liberation Angel   Jul-16-09 08:31 AM   #218 
  - Much higher cancer rates around plants makes nuclear unacceptable.  Sugarcoated   Jul-16-09 11:37 AM   #222 
  - Night time kick  Sugarcoated   Jul-16-09 09:33 PM   #223 
  - Thanks sugar, we keep getting close  Liberation Angel   Jul-16-09 10:29 PM   #225 
  - getting closer  Liberation Angel   Jul-17-09 02:40 PM   #229 
  - 77 NO NUKES, 93 Pronukes = damn!  Liberation Angel   Jul-16-09 10:27 PM   #224 
  - 79! NO NUKES! 93 Pronukers ; (  Liberation Angel   Jul-16-09 11:02 PM   #226 
  - 82 NO NUKES TO 95 pronukes - CMON Green people ! 100% Renewables. No coal.nonukes!  Liberation Angel   Jul-17-09 01:41 PM   #228 
  - Is this poll binding or something?  theboss   Jul-18-09 09:15 PM   #234 
     - If you read my posts you'd know that nukes emit deadly radiotoxins  Liberation Angel   Jul-19-09 12:45 AM   #236 
        - I meant passionate about the thread  theboss   Jul-19-09 03:07 PM   #239 
           - I support 100% renewables which are 100% possible in our lifetime  Liberation Angel   Jul-20-09 12:11 AM   #249 
              - How about today?  theboss   Jul-21-09 10:39 AM   #260 
  - Pronuke only as an INTERIM option.  johnaries   Jul-18-09 04:34 PM   #231 
  - 87 vote NO Nuke, 100 Pronuke.  Liberation Angel   Jul-19-09 11:52 AM   #238 
  - A deceptively worded poll...  SidDithers   Jul-19-09 03:25 PM   #241 
  - The unrecs kept it off he greatest page/nothing deceptive about this poll  Liberation Angel   Jul-19-09 03:31 PM   #244 
  - kick  Liberation Angel   Jul-19-09 03:26 PM   #242 
  - 23 self kicks...nt  SidDithers   Jul-19-09 03:30 PM   #243 
  - Looks like we have 101 new locations for nuclear waste dumps  Sebastian Doyle   Jul-19-09 04:33 PM   #245 
  - In their refrigerators and bedrooms (ask Karen Silkwood)  Liberation Angel   Jul-19-09 10:44 PM   #246 
  - We have enough nukes to blow up the world in one hand  Rosa Luxemburg   Jul-19-09 11:55 PM   #247 
  - thanks rosa - well said  Liberation Angel   Jul-20-09 12:08 AM   #248 
     - Nope, nothing deceptive about the wording of this poll at all...nt  SidDithers   Jul-20-09 07:30 AM   #253 
        - given your passion for nukes, it would seem that...  Liberation Angel   Jul-20-09 07:36 AM   #255 
           - I thought your poll was about nuclear energy...  SidDithers   Jul-20-09 08:38 AM   #256 
           - It IS about nuclear energy as anyone who pays attention can see  Liberation Angel   Jul-20-09 04:55 PM   #257 
           - we have about 10,000 warheads that would blast us out of the universe  Rosa Luxemburg   Jul-20-09 05:49 PM   #258 
  - France generates over 90% of their electricity from nuclear energy.  Spider Jerusalem   Jul-20-09 12:21 AM   #250 
  - France's Nukes have been a mess recently and their success is a myth (links)  Liberation Angel   Jul-20-09 07:28 AM   #252 
  - 45% NO Nukes. 52% PRO nukes  Liberation Angel   Jul-20-09 09:33 PM   #259 
  - Okay - I am almost ready to give this a rest for now - issue is postponed  Liberation Angel   Jul-22-09 07:07 PM   #263 
     - almost done  Liberation Angel   Jul-23-09 07:43 PM   #264 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC