Reply #129: Who cares who screws who? It's all just skin. [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.
First thread | Last thread

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

Fire Walk With Me

(1000+ posts)

Thu Jul-02-09 06:32 PM
Response to Original message

129. Who cares who screws who? It's all just skin.

Some is innie and some is outie. What's the big deal?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

The paternalism and hostility towards LGBTers must end	Prism	Jul-02-09 03:27 AM	#0
Off to the Greatest Page with you	NMMNG	Jul-02-09 04:17 AM	#1
K&R	PVnRT	Jul-02-09 07:27 AM	#2
May I ask a question? i.e., Devils Advocate only?	hlthe2b	Jul-02-09 07:29 AM	#3
In short, no	Prism	Jul-02-09 10:59 AM	#16
I believe the poster meant what I have stated previously	goclark	Jul-03-09 11:29 AM	#244
I posted this link to you on the 25th of June.	Starry Messenger	Jul-03-09 12:34 PM	#249
PFLAG is an excellent resource for allies	Prism	Jul-03-09 01:56 PM	#256
it's discouraging to see it.	cali	Jul-02-09 07:35 AM	#4
I agree...	LooseWilly	Jul-03-09 05:05 AM	#234
thank you	dsc	Jul-02-09 07:55 AM	#5
I don't understand it either. It seems obvious to me that discrimination against LGBT hurts	CTyankee	Jul-02-09 09:08 AM	#6
Well said	Prism	Jul-02-09 11:38 AM	#24
You are so welcome.	CTyankee	Jul-02-09 12:05 PM	#31
There are people on this board who seem to believe...	Zenlitened	Jul-02-09 09:24 AM	#7
Bravo!	TokenQueer	Jul-02-09 09:54 AM	#8
Recommended, but I think the criticism should go both ways.	Dawgs	Jul-02-09 10:04 AM	#9
Excellent point n/t	Proud Liberal Dem	Jul-02-09 10:26 AM	#10
Straight DUers are just gonna have to swallow their pride on this issue.	RandomKoolzip	Jul-02-09 10:28 AM	#11
I'm sorry. I can't just swallow my pride when someone gets angry for no reason.	Dawgs	Jul-02-09 11:54 AM	#27
Are you gay?	Starry Messenger	Jul-02-09 12:02 PM	#30
Yes. I do.	Dawgs	Jul-02-09 03:47 PM	#46
You can "decide" all you want then.	Starry Messenger	Jul-02-09 03:58 PM	#53
Who defines no reason?	Prism	Jul-02-09 12:19 PM	#35
When every reason is an excuse to attack, then whoever does the attacking is not thinking rationally	Dawgs	Jul-02-09 03:48 PM	#47
I don't see much attacking in this thread	Prism	Jul-02-09 03:50 PM	#48
+1 n/t	TokenQueer	Jul-02-09 03:55 PM	#51
The definition of "No reason" will be found in Posts #27 and #30	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 04:59 PM	#68
But Starry makes the crucial point	Prism	Jul-02-09 05:12 PM	#70
by attacking.	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 05:19 PM	#71
It wasn't an attack, it was a statement	Prism	Jul-02-09 05:31 PM	#81
It was an attack, it is a perfect example, it is chronic and it will be a lost opportunity	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 05:44 PM	#87
It was not an attack. It was an elucidation of the "paternalism" displayed	LooseWilly	Jul-02-09 06:31 PM	#128
Read with and open mind and learn LW or not. I am not following any more of your convoluted logic.	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 06:37 PM	#135
Sorry, I hate to confuse you with subtle details and logic...	LooseWilly	Jul-02-09 06:54 PM	#149
Just don't respond b/c I'm not going to read it. Thank you.	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 06:55 PM	#150
So you're responding to tell me you're not going to read... then why respond?	LooseWilly	Jul-02-09 07:09 PM	#161
Exactly	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 07:22 PM	#163
What a shock... you're not reading, but you are still going to respond...	LooseWilly	Jul-02-09 07:42 PM	#168
I'm sorry for you	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 07:56 PM	#173
Thanks?	LooseWilly	Jul-02-09 08:05 PM	#176
Thank you. Excellent explanation.	Starry Messenger	Jul-02-09 06:38 PM	#136
More of this	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 06:41 PM	#140
It was not a justification... it was an explanation... one which you choose to ignore.	LooseWilly	Jul-02-09 09:01 PM	#187
This is an elucidation of the "paternalism" displayed	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 09:14 PM	#188
You miss the point that the judgement that a poster makes that there is "no reason"	LooseWilly	Jul-02-09 09:55 PM	#193
Commonly known as "the benefit of the doubt." All the other assumptions, justifications are silly.	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 10:14 PM	#195
I notice that you're conveniently ignoring the paternalism/maternalism question.	LooseWilly	Jul-02-09 11:04 PM	#205
I don't share the assumptions you make and the SM made, which I pointed out were questionable	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 11:18 PM	#207
I disagree with you about these premises as well... but I don't consider "benefit of the doubt" a	LooseWilly	Jul-02-09 11:51 PM	#212
you can't link to another thread and you're calling out the poster.	omega minimo	Jul-03-09 12:01 AM	#213
I found what seemed like a relevant link.	LooseWilly	Jul-03-09 12:32 AM	#217
Violates DU Rules. Don't link to other threads.	omega minimo	Jul-03-09 12:47 AM	#219
Ok, respond to the rest of my posts...	LooseWilly	Jul-03-09 12:54 AM	#221
It was not an attack	varelse	Jul-02-09 07:57 PM	#174
It's a good example	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 08:32 PM	#181
He, he doesn't like to fight =) n/t	Prism	Jul-02-09 08:40 PM	#182
He doesn't like to fight and has a way with words and with people	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 08:51 PM	#185
It's not so much your initial reply that caught my attention	varelse	Jul-02-09 09:15 PM	#189
Yes it was	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 09:25 PM	#191
It wasn't an attack, it was a statement	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 08:49 PM	#184
Exactly.	Starry Messenger	Jul-02-09 09:17 PM	#190
the murkiness of "no reason" seems to have become a major stumbling block here	LooseWilly	Jul-03-09 12:52 AM	#220
The major stumbling block	omega minimo	Jul-03-09 01:37 AM	#227
"healthier for discussion"... is that your line of justification for this?	LooseWilly	Jul-03-09 04:53 AM	#233
"healthier for discussion" -- seems it would be good thing	omega minimo	Jul-03-09 01:32 PM	#255
You have a funny notion of what constitutes a definition.	LooseWilly	Jul-02-09 05:23 PM	#74
The definition is in the behavior. #30 had "no reason" to attack	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 05:26 PM	#76
There is no behavior cited to call a definition. You do realize that, right?	LooseWilly	Jul-02-09 05:55 PM	#96
Thank you LW. Don't bother with any more of your dissections.	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 06:04 PM	#101
It's good that you're able to apologize to LW.	Zenlitened	Jul-02-09 06:12 PM	#106
Every one of these bullshit swipes is an example of the petty games under discussion.	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 06:15 PM	#109
???? I thought you were agreeing with LW????	Zenlitened	Jul-02-09 06:31 PM	#126
I was not being snarky. I was trying to politely	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 06:39 PM	#137
"Your ill attitude and insinuations are indicative of what is being pointed out here."	LooseWilly	Jul-02-09 06:39 PM	#138
You said it yourself... "for NO reason"	MNBrewer	Jul-02-09 07:24 PM	#165
No one here knows exactly what the poster is referring to.	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 10:44 PM	#201
I'm as subject to human nature as anyone.	lumberjack_jeff	Jul-02-09 12:52 PM	#39
It shouldn't be an either/or proposition	Prism	Jul-02-09 01:00 PM	#40
Sometimes it's easy to interpret it that way when that is the stated intent.	lumberjack_jeff	Jul-02-09 01:14 PM	#41
That's funny. Can any other groups without their civil rights get that carte blanche?	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 04:35 PM	#64
I can understand your position	justiceischeap	Jul-02-09 10:28 AM	#12
I'm not saying you shouldn't be angry. I just think that sometimes it's missplaced.	Dawgs	Jul-02-09 11:47 AM	#25
Well said.	Daemonaquila	Jul-02-09 07:32 PM	#167
This is	ruggerson	Jul-02-09 10:39 AM	#13
This is perfect both times around	Prism	Jul-02-09 11:08 AM	#19
I agree, but that doesn't have anything to do with my post.	Dawgs	Jul-02-09 11:52 AM	#26
I've seen a lot of those "honest discussions"	Starry Messenger	Jul-02-09 12:00 PM	#29
That's how you define "honest discussion"; not me.	Dawgs	Jul-02-09 03:44 PM	#44
I did not say that you did.	Starry Messenger	Jul-02-09 03:52 PM	#50
"Straight people need to chill and listen and do less talking."	omega minimo	Jul-03-09 03:26 AM	#230
Pot, meet Kettle...	LooseWilly	Jul-03-09 05:08 AM	#235
Willy, make sense.	omega minimo	Jul-03-09 10:15 AM	#239
Too many aren't that honest	Prism	Jul-02-09 12:26 PM	#38
I agree. I've said that many are not honest.	Dawgs	Jul-02-09 03:45 PM	#45
Understood	Prism	Jul-02-09 11:05 AM	#18
Not trying to start a fight, but do you think Obama deserves to be called a bigot or homophobe.	Dawgs	Jul-02-09 11:57 AM	#28
I don't know the man	Prism	Jul-02-09 12:10 PM	#32
A question: do you believe that those that oppose interracial marriage deserve to be called racists?	VMI Dem	Jul-02-09 12:17 PM	#33
It's an undeniable point n/t	Prism	Jul-02-09 12:20 PM	#36
Yes. I do.	Dawgs	Jul-02-09 03:52 PM	#49
The President opposes same-sex marriage	Prism	Jul-02-09 03:55 PM	#52
I prefer "Political Opportunist"...	TokenQueer	Jul-02-09 12:18 PM	#34
He has come right out and said he does not believe gay people should be allowed to marry	Mystayya	Jul-03-09 12:27 PM	#248
Agreed - and	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 04:30 PM	#62
recommended n/t	ruggerson	Jul-02-09 10:41 AM	#14
K&R. Some straights will rationalize anything Obama does or doesn't do. I'm not one of them.	solstice	Jul-02-09 10:48 AM	#15
The LGBT fight is a powerfully good fight.	lunatica	Jul-02-09 11:02 AM	#17
I'd be remiss	Prism	Jul-02-09 11:12 AM	#20
Ditto.	TokenQueer	Jul-02-09 11:15 AM	#21
Ditto.	TokenQueer	Jul-02-09 11:15 AM	#22
Thank you for saying that ~	goclark	Jul-03-09 12:25 PM	#247
recommended.	Starry Messenger	Jul-02-09 11:36 AM	#23
I have to admit that I am surprised by the treatment gays receive on this very site.	VMI Dem	Jul-02-09 12:25 PM	#37
Only 450 posts in 4 years?...	Robeson	Jul-02-09 01:46 PM	#42
Thanks!	Prism	Jul-02-09 03:15 PM	#43
Your allies are tired of being told they suck.	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 04:02 PM	#54
Well if that's their biggest problem . . .	Prism	Jul-02-09 04:06 PM	#55
Whoooosh!!!!! Sounds like you are dealing with troublemakers after your allies are shut up by being	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 04:13 PM	#56
Troublemakers like...........you?	TokenQueer	Jul-02-09 04:21 PM	#58
I would say the same back; having noticed what Forum this Greatest OP is in, you've proven my point.	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 04:23 PM	#60
I have a different view	Prism	Jul-02-09 04:21 PM	#59
Prism, I think part of the mystery	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 04:28 PM	#61
I appreciate the tone of your response	Prism	Jul-02-09 04:33 PM	#63
Thank you for the reasoned OP	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 04:41 PM	#66
Don't you mean "allies"?	LooseWilly	Jul-02-09 04:35 PM	#65
!!!!!11111!1!!!! !!!^%^$^&5WR$qw!!!!!11111	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 04:43 PM	#67
allies like you?	mitchtv	Jul-02-09 05:20 PM	#72
Another fine example	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 05:27 PM	#77
another fine example of an idiot trying desperately	mitchtv	Jul-03-09 05:13 PM	#268
No that would be "allies." n/t	bluedawg12	Jul-02-09 05:37 PM	#84
If you have an open mind	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 05:52 PM	#94
Well, guess what? You suck.	chascarrillo	Jul-02-09 07:05 PM	#157
Another example of the crap behavior being pointed out here. Including the false accusations.	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 07:24 PM	#166
This post....	SacredCow	Jul-02-09 04:15 PM	#57
As a gay man, I have NOT seen this "paternalism and hostility"	Political Tiger	Jul-02-09 05:08 PM	#69
There it is.	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 05:21 PM	#73
Maybe you shoud re-read part of your post.	Behind the Aegis	Jul-02-09 05:23 PM	#75
OK, I re-read it...and? n/t	Political Tiger	Jul-02-09 05:28 PM	#79
Apparently nothing else from your post sank in. Your excellent post will reach others.	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 05:47 PM	#90
"Your excellent post will reach others."	Number23	Jul-02-09 06:11 PM	#104
Well, there's that.	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 06:17 PM	#111
Perhaps it didn't sink in for you. It is apparent from your attitude and behavior.	Behind the Aegis	Jul-02-09 08:59 PM	#186
I understood the post with no need	omega minimo	Jul-03-09 02:54 AM	#229
That sounds like Nya Nya Nya Nyah Nya!!!	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 05:29 PM	#80
Can we hear Prism & Political Tiger without the playground stuff in between? A fascinating debate.	Jackeens	Jul-02-09 05:39 PM	#85
you	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 05:45 PM	#88
Prism & Political Tiger's thoughts? Reflective and absorbing. "Nya Nya Nya Nyah Nya"? Not so much.	Jackeens	Jul-02-09 05:56 PM	#97
That would be you	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 06:01 PM	#100
"Don't think your antics are not appreciated for what they are." Oh omega minimo......	Jackeens	Jul-02-09 06:09 PM	#103
You are "intruding with inflammatory and mindless shit-stirring. "	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 06:16 PM	#110
Flame, flame, flame, flame, flame....	Jackeens	Jul-02-09 06:17 PM	#112
"Goodbye" speaks for itself.	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 06:27 PM	#119
Well done omega minimo, mission accomplished: your spamming of this thread has wrecked it.	Jackeens	Jul-02-09 06:30 PM	#122
Look in the mirror.	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 06:31 PM	#127
STOP IT. BOTH OF YOU.	Number23	Jul-02-09 06:37 PM	#134
Sorry Number23, war over - promise!	Jackeens	Jul-02-09 06:48 PM	#146
"Both"?	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 06:50 PM	#148
No, Jackeens, she (and others) have not wrecked it	ruggerson	Jul-02-09 06:41 PM	#139
how can you not take this opportunity to read with an open mind?	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 06:46 PM	#142
You're spot on ruggerson	Jackeens	Jul-02-09 06:47 PM	#
You are some piece of work	cboy4	Jul-03-09 04:03 AM	#232
another example	omega minimo	Jul-03-09 10:31 AM	#240
Deleted message	Name removed	Jul-03-09 11:15 AM	#243
Deleted message	Name removed	Jul-03-09 11:34 AM	#245
This is a striking portrayal of the illusion of privilege	Prism	Jul-02-09 05:28 PM	#78
This is as good as it gets.	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 05:40 PM	#86
What privilege?	Political Tiger	Jul-02-09 05:49 PM	#92
True and truer	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 05:59 PM	#98
Privilege would mean, speaking only for myself PT -	bluedawg12	Jul-02-09 06:12 PM	#105
Well, I can't disagree with anything you said!	Political Tiger	Jul-02-09 06:27 PM	#120
I wonder	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 06:57 PM	#152
Political Tiger you hit on a number of important points.	bluedawg12	Jul-02-09 07:03 PM	#155
You have made a good case for the need to address women's rights in order to achieve gender equality	omega minimo	Jul-03-09 03:34 AM	#231
I think we disagree on a point of interpretation vs. practical application	Prism	Jul-02-09 06:14 PM	#108
Deleted message	Name removed	Jul-02-09 06:20 PM	#114
I notice it	Prism	Jul-02-09 06:23 PM	#116
"And I believe the only way to repair it is by going straight on through."	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 06:25 PM	#118
the missing message was a compliment to your communications skills. I know you took it that way.	omega minimo	Jul-03-09 04:49 PM	#266
Possibly	Political Tiger	Jul-02-09 06:55 PM	#151
I don't disagree with most of what you've stated	Prism	Jul-02-09 07:04 PM	#156
But Obama's Secretary of Defense undercut that argument a day later	ruggerson	Jul-02-09 07:08 PM	#159
I think an excutive order to stop the discharge of gay service members	bluedawg12	Jul-02-09 07:24 PM	#164
Sometimes boldness is called for.	Daemonaquila	Jul-02-09 07:55 PM	#172
Well-said, 100% n/t	Prism	Jul-02-09 08:04 PM	#175
Excellent post. I wouldn't alter/dissect/dissemble a word of it.	Zenlitened	Jul-02-09 06:28 PM	#121
I have seen anger and name calling at GLBT's for fighting for justice.	bluedawg12	Jul-02-09 05:35 PM	#83
.	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 05:48 PM	#91
Thanks for your post	CakeGrrl	Jul-02-09 05:47 PM	#89
"The hyperbole is combative and shuts down any chance to have a dialogue that won't flame out."	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 05:50 PM	#93
It isn't a black and white dichotomy, though	Prism	Jul-02-09 06:00 PM	#99
Speaking of "the woodshed" where've you been hiding out?	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 06:13 PM	#107
I agree	Prism	Jul-02-09 06:20 PM	#113
Wow.	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 06:23 PM	#115
that's a very good point	Number23	Jul-02-09 06:24 PM	#117
I think . . .	Prism	Jul-02-09 06:30 PM	#124
I appreciate your desire to view that particular incident in the manner you've viewed it.	Number23	Jul-02-09 06:36 PM	#133
who said she did this on her own?	marimour	Jul-03-09 03:05 PM	#259
I disagree	Prism	Jul-03-09 03:16 PM	#262
criedit DOJ? I was talking about Obama	marimour	Jul-03-09 03:23 PM	#263
Your complaint seems oppositely directed	Prism	Jul-03-09 04:11 PM	#264
+100. You win.	Number23	Jul-02-09 06:09 PM	#102
This isn't a game. This is about people's lives.	ruggerson	Jul-02-09 06:30 PM	#123
It's about all of our lives. A civil discussion reflects and respects that.	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 06:33 PM	#131
I haven't even read the story	Prism	Jul-02-09 06:44 PM	#141
It's breaking all over the news	ruggerson	Jul-02-09 06:50 PM	#147
That's fucking heartbreaking.	Starry Messenger	Jul-02-09 06:59 PM	#153
This gives a little more background	ruggerson	Jul-02-09 07:44 PM	#169
Ugh	Prism	Jul-02-09 07:08 PM	#160
A US Marine was murdered at Camp Pendelton as a hate crime?	bluedawg12	Jul-02-09 07:08 PM	#158
a black gay marine and it wasnt a hate crime (it was a random murder)	marimour	Jul-03-09 03:08 PM	#260
Agreed. Every word. No one on here is targetting GLBT members.	jazzjunkysue	Jul-02-09 06:47 PM	#144
AND you're funny	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 06:59 PM	#154
If you haven't seen hostility towards gay people here	ruggerson	Jul-02-09 06:47 PM	#145
"they...they...they....they"	Neecy	Jul-02-09 08:17 PM	#177
Neecy	ruggerson	Jul-02-09 08:47 PM	#183
Well said Political Tiger...I appreciate your posts and I've read	firedupdem	Jul-02-09 08:23 PM	#180
Your reply is thought provoking	grantcart	Jul-02-09 09:58 PM	#194
Ah, but see, you reverse the onus	Prism	Jul-02-09 10:15 PM	#196
beautifully expressed - the one or two people who routinely express a decidedly minority opinion	ruggerson	Jul-02-09 10:24 PM	#198
Who on this board holds "noxious beliefs"	HamdenRice	Jul-03-09 10:01 AM	#237
calling different beliefs noxious is part of the problem	marimour	Jul-03-09 03:12 PM	#261
That is the dichotomy that you embrace, I do not	grantcart	Jul-02-09 11:17 PM	#206
I cannot fully reply to you	Prism	Jul-02-09 11:32 PM	#210
delete. wrong area.	Robeson	Jul-03-09 12:17 AM	#214
sadly, grantcart	ruggerson	Jul-02-09 10:41 PM	#200
At what point did you not think that the GLBT community has a long rich history of	grantcart	Jul-02-09 11:34 PM	#211
I can't speak for Prism	ruggerson	Jul-03-09 12:45 AM	#218
I apologize that my reply above was so garbled but you seemed to	grantcart	Jul-03-09 01:21 AM	#225
He's talking about what we're talking about.	omega minimo	Jul-03-09 01:00 PM	#254
Ruggerson is correct	Prism	Jul-03-09 01:10 AM	#223
Thank you for this very thoughtful post! nt	HamdenRice	Jul-03-09 10:03 AM	#238
You make some excellent points in your OP Prism.	bluedawg12	Jul-02-09 05:33 PM	#82
Righteous cause, indeed	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 05:53 PM	#95
Prism, please post more on DU, I love your insight. Thanks.	Jackeens	Jul-02-09 06:30 PM	#125
Thank you for that	Prism	Jul-02-09 06:47 PM	#143
Jackeens - thank you.	bluedawg12	Jul-02-09 07:13 PM	#162
Thank you back bluedawg12	Jackeens	Jul-02-09 07:47 PM	#170
Thanks, Jackeens, we really are in this together.	bluedawg12	Jul-02-09 10:36 PM	#199
Who cares who screws who? It's all just skin.	Fire Walk With Me	Jul-02-09 06:32 PM	#129
The disruptors in this thread merely prove the OP's point	ruggerson	Jul-02-09 06:32 PM	#130
So apparently you won't be reading and learning from all of the insights here.	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 06:35 PM	#132
K&R	varelse	Jul-02-09 07:48 PM	#171
I ain't nobodies daddy	quakerboy	Jul-02-09 08:17 PM	#178
I am on your side.	Dappleganger	Jul-02-09 08:18 PM	#179
My political act for the day: I'm OUT. I'm GAY. And OK this is	trickyguy	Jul-02-09 09:52 PM	#192
Well	Prism	Jul-02-09 10:51 PM	#203
Maybe it's time for a new coalition, a return to when groups worked together	omega minimo	Jul-02-09 10:18 PM	#197
which groups would you base that cooperation upon?	LooseWilly	Jul-03-09 05:22 AM	#236
Those that can comprehend working together	omega minimo	Jul-03-09 10:33 AM	#241
K&R....We March...	AntiFascist	Jul-02-09 10:48 PM	#202
Despite raising thousands of dollars for LGBT causes and hundreds of hours during LGBT grassroots...	zulchzulu	Jul-02-09 11:03 PM	#204
I wish I could applaud the OP but I'm reluctant to do so.	crim son	Jul-02-09 11:23 PM	#208
Now seems as good a time as any	Prism	Jul-02-09 11:27 PM	#209
Laughing.	crim son	Jul-03-09 12:30 AM	#216
With all due respect	Prism	Jul-03-09 01:00 AM	#222
Since it's here	bluedawg12	Jul-03-09 01:37 AM	#226
Is that out in paperback yet?	omega minimo	Jul-03-09 02:05 AM	#228
I would like to make a suggestion	Mystayya	Jul-03-09 10:56 AM	#242
What a remarkable reply	omega minimo	Jul-03-09 12:18 PM	#246
I knew posting to you would be a mistake.	Mystayya	Jul-03-09 12:37 PM	#250
If those words	omega minimo	Jul-03-09 12:49 PM	#252
Thanks for your thanks.	crim son	Jul-03-09 02:38 PM	#258
Kick again. I welcome your post, Prism. You've opened up a new paradigm here...	Robeson	Jul-03-09 12:22 AM	#215
k&r for equality NOW	livefreest	Jul-03-09 01:18 AM	#224
(shrug) Go it alone, then. Best wishes (not sarcastic).	BlooInBloo	Jul-03-09 12:44 PM	#251
If the shoes fit... nt	jumptheshadow	Jul-03-09 12:59 PM	#253
Exactly	Prism	Jul-03-09 02:33 PM	#257
Prism is not alone	varelse	Jul-03-09 04:42 PM	#265
Thank you	Prism	Jul-03-09 04:58 PM	#267

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.